The Post-Modern Era Spirituality Crisis: Values of Ideals a Post-Pandemic Day

Nataliya Salnikova, Oleksandra Khltobina, Iryna Gavrysh, Oksana Aleksandrova, Viktoriya Grygor’yeva

Abstract


In the postmodern era, the fundamental foundations of the human soul swayed. In accordance with this, in scientific approaches, there is a complex and controversial process of reassessment of the axiological orientations of modern man. Despite the painful collisions of this process, in the conditions of postmodernity, a person of a creative warehouse gets an unprecedented freedom so far, based on the constructive basis of spirituality, thanks to which a person acquires the ability to distance himself from society and independently critically comprehend all aspects and spheres of his life. The intensification of the search for the meaning of life on an individual-personal level is a characteristic sign of the development of society not only in the West, but also in societies with the preservation of traditional specifics. The effectiveness of the search for the meaning of life in the real world is directly dependent on the development by people of the new islands of freedom, life forms and directions of creativity, corresponding to the realities of the break of millennia. The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems of modern society, such as: globalization challenges, problems of attitude to the world, the environmental perception of the world in particular, and the problems of educating spirituality as a spiritual attitude to the world and to a holistic personality.


Keywords


spirituality; postmodern; postpandemic society; crisis of modernity; environmental problems; globalization

Full Text:

View PDF

References


Abakarova, R. M., & Gadzhimirzoeva, O. S. (2018). Problema nravstvennosti v ekologii [The problem of morality in ecology]. South of Russia: ecology, development, 3, 10-15.

Agadzhanyan, N. A. (2016). Ecology of the soul: culture, morality, spirituality. Human ecology, 2, 35-38.

Baudrillard, J. (1998). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. SAGE Publications Ltd. 224 p.

Cairns, J. (1977). Quantification of Biological Integrity. In R. K. Ballentine, & L. J. Guarraia (Coord.). The Integrity of Water: Symposium (pp. 171-187). Washington D.C.

Deleuze, J., & Guattari, F. (2009). What is philosophy? Moscow: Columbia Academic Project.

Foucault, M. (1993). Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu [The history of madness in the classical era]. St. Petersburg, 576.

Frank, S. L. (1992). The spiritual foundations of society. Moscow: Republic.

Gapanovich, S. O., & Levchenko, V. F. (2017). K voprosu ob informatsionnoy antropoekologii [To the question of informational anthropoecology]. The principles of ecology, 4, 4-16.

Gusev, M. V. (2015). Obrashcheniye k chelovechestvu [Appeal to humanity]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 16. Biology, 1. 3-5.

Hegel, G. (2017). Filosofiya istorii [Philosophy of History]. Strelbytskyy Multimedia Publishing, 622 p.

Kanke, V. A. (2003). Fundamentals of Philosophy. Moscow: Logos, 288 p.

Lacan, J. (2002). On the nonsense and structure of God. Advisory psychology and psychotherapy, 10(1), 36-50.

Leopold, A. (1968). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, 226 p.

Peceei, A. (2019). Human qualities. Moscow: Progress, 304 p.

Rather, J. (Ed.), (2014). The Philosophy of Spinoza. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 262 p.

Rolston, H. (1975). Is there an ecological ethic. Ethics, 85(2), 91-109.

Rolston, H. (1992). Philosophy Gone Wild. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 269 p.

Schreider, Yu. A. (2016). Global problems and universal values. In Utopia or organization (pp. 7-25). Moscow.

Sorokin, P. (2012). Man. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat, 543 p.

Tsvetaeva, M. N. (2019). Ekologiya kul'tury: priroda, chelovek, tsivilizatsiya v khudozhestvennom i informatsionnom prostranstve russkogo mira [Ecology of culture: nature, man, civilization in the artistic and information space of the Russian world]. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2(26), 240-243.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup2/145

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Postmodern Openings | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Gold Open Access Journal |

Journal covered in | Web of Science (WOS); EBSCO; ERIH+; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Ideas RePeC; Econpapers; Socionet; CEEOL; Ulrich ProQuest; Cabell, Journalseek; Scipio; Philpapers; SHERPA/RoMEO repositories; KVK; WorldCat; CrossRef; J-GATE