The Appointment of the History Philosophy in Comprehending Modern Civilizational Challenges in a Post-Pandemic Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1Sup2/142Keywords:
philosophy history, challenges, society, post-pandemicAbstract
A retrospective look at social theory shows that the need for philosophical and historical research arises at the junction of significant historical events when qualitative changes in social processes occur. At the beginning of the emergence of bourgeois social relations, when old ideas about society and people were destroyed, when instead of a religious understanding of the world, completely new views on the surrounding social environment were needed, it was philosophical and historical concepts that could help society find the desired confidence in the future. Such a function of the philosophical and historical worldview can be extremely relevant even in the conditions of the crisis phenomena of the present, when in the era of a pandemic, society is stratified and a global crisis is emerging in all its manifestations. Modern globalization, covering all spheres of public life - economics, politics, culture, has forced mankind to once again find itself in the wirl of a historical turn, during which contradictions between different states, peoples and civilizations have intensified and deepened. The main objective of the study is to characterize the purpose of the philosophy of history in understanding modern civilizational challenges in a post-pandemic society.
References
Ankersmit, F. (2003). Invitation to Historian. Rethinking history, 7(3), 413-437.
Aron, R. (1981). Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity. Greenwood Pub Group, 351.
Callot, E. (1962). Ambiguites et antimonies de l’histoire et de la philosophic [Ambiguities and antimonies of history and philosophy]. Paris, 69, Rivière Publishing.
Carr, D. (1986). Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity. History and Theory, 25(2), 117-131.
Carroll, N. (2000) Tropology and Narration. History and Theory: Journal of the philosophy of history, 39(4), 396-404.
Danto, A. (1962) Narrative sentences. History and Theory: Studies in the philosophy of history, 2(2), 146-179.
Efremov, O. (2018). Marksyzm yak metodolohiya vyvchennya suchasnoho kapitalizmu [Marxism as a methodology for the study of modern capitalism]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7, Philosophy, 5, 85-93.
Frye, N. (1957) The Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, vol. 10. Princeton University Press, 383 p.
Hegel, G. (2007). Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit 1827-8. Oxford University Press, 287.
Karpov, S. (2019). Rozdumy pro rozuminnya istoriyi [Reflections on understanding the story]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 8. History, 1, 3-17.
Marx, K. (1992). Marx K. The Poverty of Philosophy. International Publishers Co, 240.
Mironov, V. (2019). Pro rolʹ filosofiyi v suspilʹstvi: uroky Karla Marksa [On the role of philosophy in society: the lessons of Karl Marx]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 5, 12-19.
Pin-Buzgalina, L. (2018). Sotsialʹnyy prohres ta yoho tsina: dialektyka vidchuzhennya ta vidchuzhennya [Social progress and its price: the dialectic of alienation and alienation]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7, Philosophy, 5, 73-84.
Popper, K. (2002). The Poverty of Historicism. Routledge, 176 p.
Popper, K. (2013). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press, 808 p.
Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, 424 p.
Savelyeva I., & Poletaev, A. (2017). Istoriya i vremya: v poiskakh pogibshikh [History and time: in search of the lost]. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture, 800 p.
Segal, A. (2018). Formuvannya uyavlenʹ K. Marksa pro vnutrishnye dzherelo rozvytku suspilʹstva [The formation of K. Marx's ideas about the internal source of development of society]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7, Philosophy, 6, 14-26.
Whitehead, A. (1948). Science and Philosophy. Philosophical Library, 151 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
