Postmodern Picture of Reality of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution by Epistemological Diversity




postmodernism, pluralism, methodology of knowledge, philosophy of science, postpositivism


The modern world is colorful, diverse, contradictory and not without contradictions. Accordingly, the problems of the modern world are a combination of various problems closely intertwined and interconnected. So, the study of the fundamental foundations of cognition becomes relevant, among which the postmodern methodology stands out as particularly pluralistic, in its development it responded to the trends of the time and was always aimed at solving problems of a particular person, distinguished by the “humanity”, “reality” of thought. Within the framework of postmodernism, representatives of this trend pose problems that are difficult to solve. Firstly, this is due to the fact that postmodernists claim that, on the one hand, speech-discourse constructs reality, and on the other, reality itself determines discourse. Secondly, they emphasize that there is no place for a general theory either in science or in humanitarian studies, while this statement is part of theoretical knowledge. Third, in discussing consumer society, cultural pluralism, postmodernists turn to “realistic ontology”. So, putting forward the thesis that society is a kind of product of discourse, they voluntarily or involuntarily uphold the idealistic epistemology. The ideas of postmodernism can be perceived very differently. A certain number of people may “not accept” the views of postmodernism, depriving its representatives of an essential role in modern philosophy of science.


Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). New vistas for qualitative research (second edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Ardashkin, I. (2007). Continuity of the problem as a feature of its ontological status in the context of the philosophy of J. Deleuze. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 310(3), 138-142.

Arxer, S., Murphy, J., & Belgrave, J. (2007). Temporality and old age: a postmodern critique. In J.L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates (pp. 125-140). Nova Science.

Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford.

Epstein, M. (1999). Toward a Philosophy of the Possible. Introduction to the postcritical era. Questions of philosophy, 6, 59.

Feyerabedn, P. (1981). Problems of empiricism. Philosophical papers. Cambridge, 2, 23-45.

Ilyn, I. (1998). Postmodernism from its beginnings to the end of the century: the evolution of a scientific myth. Intrada Journal, 200-220.

Ishenko, E. (2018). Problema realʹnosti u filosofsʹko-humanitarnomu dyskursi [The problem of reality in philosophical and humanitarian discourse]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7, Philosophy, 2, 3-20.

Ishenko, E. (2006). Hnoseolohiya XX stolittya: tendentsiyi ta perspektyvy [Epistemology of the XX century: trends and prospects]. Vestn. Voronezh state. un-that. Ser. 1. The humanities, 2, 166-180.

Jonsen, A., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: history of moral reasoning. University of California Press.

Markova, L. (2019). Philosophy from chaos. J. Deleuze and postmodernism in philosophy, science, religion. Canon +

Mendelsohn, E. (1977). The social construction of scientific knowledge. In E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, & R. Whitly (Eds.), The social production of scientific knowledge. Sociology of the Siences (pp. 3-26). Dordrecht.. URL:

Meshcheryakova, L. (2019). Vesvit - teatr: predmetna ta dyskursyvna praktyka yak metod sotsialʹnoho piznannya [The whole world is a theater: subject and discursive practice as a method of social cognition]. Bulletin of the Ros. University of friendship of peoples. Series: Sociology, 2, 127-133.

Mouzelis, N. (2007). Cognitive relativism: between positivistic and relativistic thinking in social sciences. In J.L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates (pp. 15-28). Nova Science.

Naimushin, V. (2007). Post-industrial mythology as a "borrowed text." Terra Economicus, 5(3), 85-88.

Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. University of Chicago Press.

Pykhtina, T. (2018). On the issue of systemic science in the light of postmodernism. Ideas and ideals, 2(12, T.2), 35-40.

Shestakova, M. (2018). Indyvidualʹne myslennya v konteksti pryntsypu plyuralizmu [Individual thinking in the context of the principle of pluralism]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 4, 3-18.

Sibeon, R. (2007). An excursus in post-modern social science. In J.L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates (pp. 29-40). Nova Science.

Springer De Freitas R. & Pietrobon R. (2007). Whoever could get rid of the context of discovery. Context of justification dichotomy? A proposal based on recent developments in clinical research. Journal of medicine a. philosophy. Georgetown, 32(2), 25-42.




How to Cite

Bekh, V., Yaroshenko, A., Zhyzhko, T., Ignatyev, V., & Dodonov, R. (2020). Postmodern Picture of Reality of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution by Epistemological Diversity. Postmodern Openings, 11(3), 207-219.



Theoretical articles

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now