Society Ladenness Model: System-Parametric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/284Keywords:
ladenness of facts, the concept of social ladenness, the coronavirus pandemic, bifurcational ladennesses, system-parametric analysisAbstract
The system-parametric method developed by A. Uyemov allows creating a model of the contemporary bifurcational reality. There are many terms adopted from other sciences which are often used in postmodern philosophy. Bifurcation is one of such terms adopted from synergetics. In this article emphasis is placed on the contemporary time which is bifurcational in its essence. Using the key thesis of the systems method which states that any object can be presented as a system, we propose to create a model of social ladenness. The mere fact that ladenness exists, makes the system of crisis (bifurcation) nature. The social ladenness is defined using system descriptors. This definition contains the concept, the structure, and the substrate of the object and analysis of their elements. Consistence and hierarchical arrangement of the descriptors is the social ladenness model under discussion. The elements identified in the social ladenness model are the economic, political, technical, ecological, religious, creative and bifurcation impact. We identified some markers of human existence in the community system. The coronavirus pandemic is used as an example to demonstrate the way the bifurcation society system model can be built in order to find solutions to overcome the social and individual crises.
References
Akeju, O. A., Ayedero, T. M. & Fasoro, J. O. (2019). Philosophy and Culture as Quest for Global Peace. International Journal of Philosophy, 7(4), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20190704.13
Aristotel. (1978). Sochineniya v 4 tomah. Filosofskoe nasledie [Corpus of works in four volumes. Philosophical Heritage] (Vol. 2). Мysl.
Berdyayev, N. A. (1933, May). Chelovek i mashina (Problema sociologii i meraphiziki tekhniki) [The person and the Machine (The Problem of Sociology and Metaphysics of Technic)]. Put, 38, 3-37. http://yakov.works/lib_sec/16_p/ut/put_ind.html
Berdyayev, N. A. (1989). Chelovek i mashina (Problema sociologii i meraphiziki tekhniki) [The person and the Machine (The Problem of Sociology and Metaphysics of Technic)]. Filosofskiye voprosi [Phylosophy issues], 2, 147-162. https://www.twirpx.com/file/3127598/
Cablook. (2014). Sledy epidemij v mirovoj kulture: ot chumy do eboly [Traces of epidemics in world culture: from plague to ebola]. Cablook. http://www.cablook.com/mixlook/ot-chumy-do-eboly-sledy-epidemij-v-mirovoj-kulture/
Cascio, W. F. & Montealegre, R. (2016, March). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
Chuikova, L. Y. (2011). Ekologicheskaya model’ social’noy sistemy: vzaimosvyaz’ i vzaimoobuskovlennost’ razvitiya sotsial’noy i prorodnoy sistem. [Ecological model of social system: interaction and interdependence of the development of the systems of society and nature]. Astrakhan Ecological Education Newsletter, 2(18), 20-34. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskaya-model-sotsialnoy-sistemy-vzaimosvyaz-i-vzaimoobuslovlennost-razvitiya-sotsialnoy-i-prirodnoy-sistem
Erikson, E. H. (1979). Dimensions of a New Identity: The Jefferson Lectures in the Humanities. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Innerarity, D. (2017). The Improvement of Democracy Trought Transparency and Its Limits. International Journal of Philosophy, 5(5), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20170505.11
Inosmi. (2017). The future of global religions. Inosmi. https://inosmi.ru/religion/20170208/238688310.html
Jerca, P. & Zdenka, Š. (2019). Upravljanje Stresnih Emocij Na Delovnem Mestu [Management of Stress Emotions in the Workplace]. Družboslovne razprave, XXXV(91), 29-45. www.druzboslovne-razprave.org/pdf/stevilke/DR91-Jerca%20Pavlic%20in%20Zdenka%20Sadl-WEB.pdf
Jevsejev, R. (2020). Information technology risk assessment methods and improvement solutions. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis. Science – Future of Lithuania, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2020.10562
Karpovičiūtė, R., & Sabaitytė, J. (2019). Didžiųjų duomenų panaudojimas socialinėje medijoje [The Big Data use in social media]. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis. Science – Future of Lithuania, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2019.9585
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics. (2014). Mezhdunarodnye ekologicheskie organizacii [International environmental organizations]. Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics. https://knute.edu.ua/blog/read/?pid=5106&ru
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965 (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434
Latour, B. (1999). Politiquedela nature. Comment faire entrer les science en démocratie. [Politics of nature. How to bring science into democracy]. La Découverte. pp. 9-17, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.6525
Marchuk, L. & Yatsyna, O. (2020). Assertiveness of Discursive Selfreferential Identity: Postmodern Paradigm. Postmodern Opening, 11(1), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/116
Nerubasska, A. & Lopuha, O. (2020). Pandemic Panik in information space: the fact and its ladenness. Postmodern Openings, 11(1, Suppl. 2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup2/144
Nerubasskaya, A. A. (2013). Sistemno-deskriptornyj analiz nagruzhennosti nauchnogo fakta [Monografiya] [System-descriptor analysis of the ladenness of scientific fact [Monograph]]. International Publishing House LAP LAMBERT Academic Pablishing.
Ogilvie, B. (2018). Negative Anthropology. Extermination as the Starting Point of the Reconsideration of Philosophical Anthropology. FILOZOFIA, 73(1), 51-62. http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/negativna-antropologia-vyhladzovanie-ako-vychodisko-premyslenia-filozofickej-antropologie
Pazdera, M. (2019). Etika Sociálnych Dôsledkov a Evolučná Ontológia V Súčasnom Eko-Etickom Diskurze [Ethics of Social Consequences and Evolutionary Ontology in Contemporary Environmental Ethics]. Pro-Fil, 20(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.5817/pf19-1-1847
Prokofyev, A. V. (2019). Moral’, Veroyatnost’ i risk [Moral, probability, and Risk]. Zhurnal filosofii [The Philosophy Journal], 12(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-2-5-19
Rayhert, K. V. (2013). Filosofsko-metodolohichni zasady dvoistoho systemno-parametrychnoho modeliuvannia: monuscript [Phylosophical methodological principles of dual systems parametric modeling: monuscript]. I.I. Mechnikov Odessa National University. pp. 73-74.
Razlichie cheloveka antichnosti i srednevekovya [The difference between man of antiquity and the Middle Ages]. (n.d.). http://sci.house/osnovyi-sotsiologii/chelovek-antichnosti-srednevekovya-razlichie-65237.html
Stroll, A., Maurer, A., von Fritz, K., Levi, A. W., Chambre, H., Wolin, R., & McLellan, D. T. (2020). Western philosophy. Positivism and social theory in Comte, Mill, and Marx. Encyclopedia Britannica. www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy/Positivism-and-social-theory-in-Comte-Mill-and-Marx#ref365978
Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human Understanding (Vol. 1). Clarendon Press.
Uyеmov, A. I. (1978). Sistemnyj analiz i obshaya teoriya [Systems approach and general theory of systems]. Musl.
Zekrullah, R. (2020). The Importance and Necessity of Dialogue of Civilizations: Increasing of human crisis around the world. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 8(6), 1438-1441. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i06
Zerkalo nedeli. (2012). Sociologi podschitali kolichestvo veruyushih na zemle [Sociologists have calculated the number of believers on planet Earth]. ZN. https://zn.ua/SOCIETY/sotsiologi_podschitali_kolichestvo_veruyuschih_na_zemle_bolshe_vsego_hristian_i_musulman.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND