Historical Evolution of Knowledge: Interpretation of Truth in Postmodernism





knowledge, truth, postmodernism, historical, postmodern society


Changes in society lead to changes in science, changing its fundamental foundations - ideological and value, methodological and instrumental foundations. In turn, a change in the scientific paradigm leads to social change. A situation of this kind is especially evident in the socio-political sciences, since it is they who are more affected by social reality. The nature of postmodern societies is such that its economic component generates a huge number of subcultures, in the scientific world it is called "subcultural explosion." Postmodern societies are societies of permanent changes: consumer standards, moral values, political structure, and so on, repeatedly change during the life of one generation, significantly affect the search for the truth of science and its understanding. In the list of various questions of truth, its character, origin, postmodern departs from objective truth, therefore it becomes contextual and consensus. Theories are replaced by approaches, views, points of view, thoughts. Scientific concepts with their strict certainty change concepts, in which under the same name everyone puts their own meaning and essence. According to this, in postmodernism, not only the scientific paradigm as a model of scientific activity is changing, but the purpose of science, its understanding as a special activity with the search for truth, is changing. This implies a review of the attitude to the "organizational forms" of science, that is, the way in which scientific knowledge is disseminated to the professional scientific community to search for truth, which in its classical understanding no longer exists.


Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekushchaya sovremennost' [Flowing modernity] (Vol. 20). Peter.

Berger, P. (2013). Sotsial'noye konstruirovaniye real'nosti [Social construction of reality] (Vol. 16). Medium. 323 p.

Bilalov, M. (2019). Zavisimost' kognitivnoy kul'tury ot istiny [The dependence of cognitive culture on the interpretation of truth]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 2, 3-8. http://www.spsl.nsc.ru/FullText/konfe/%D0%9B%D0%9C%D0%9D-20191.pdf

Dandaron, M. (2009). The discursive content of postmodernism. Vestn. Buryat. state un-that. Ulan-Ude. Issue. 6a: Philosophy, sociology, political science, cultural science, 5(2), 109-113.

Deleuze, G. (1996). What Is Philosophy? (Revised edition). Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, J. (1998). Logika smysla [The logic of meaning]. Rarity; Business Book. 480 p.

Derrida, J. (2000). O grammatologii [About grammatology]. Ad Marginem. 512 p.

Eco, U. (2018). From the Internet to Gutenberg: text and hypertext. New literary review, 32, 5-14.

Foucault, M. (2014). Slova i veshchi [Words and things]. A-cad. 408 p.

Heisenberg, V. (1987). Shagi za gorizont [Steps over the horizon]. Progress. 368 p.

Ilyin, I. (2018). Postmodernizm ot yego istokov do kontsa veka: evolyutsiya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from its origins to the end of the century: the evolution of scientific myth]. Intrada. 255 p.

Ischenko E. (2015) Problema real'nosti v filosofsko-gumanitarnom diskurse [The problem of reality in philosophical and humanitarian discourse]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 2, 3-20. http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/hyman/2003/02/ischenko.pdf

Kozlovsky, T. (2015). Postmodern Modernity. Questions of philosophy. No. 10. 85-95.

Kukartseva, M. (2017). Epistemologiya i ontologiya istorii [Epistemology and ontology of history]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 1, 24-35. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/epistemologiya-i-ontologiya-istorii

Lazarev, F. (2015). The problem of truth in the social sciences and humanities: an interval approach. Questions of philosophy, 10, 95-113.

Lyotard, J. (1998). Sostoyaniye postmodernizma [The state of postmodernism]. Aletheia. 360 p.

Markova, L. (2020). Science and the logic of the meaning of J. Deleuze. Philosophical sciences, 6, 254-281.

Momjyan, K. (2020). Progressiruyet li sovremennaya sotsial'naya filosofiya [Is modern social philosophy progressing?] Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 4, 97-123.

Porus, V. (2016). Is science a self-organizing system? Questions of philosophy, 9, 95-108.

Pykhtina, T. (2019). On the issue of systemic science in the light of postmodernism. Ideas and ideals. 2(12, T.2), 35-40.

Reza, D. (2016). Filosofiya i budushcheye [Philosophy and the future]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 4, 93-98. https://www.lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2015_Sbornik/2015_Dokladi/2015_plen_004.pdf

Welsh, V. (1992). Postmodern. Genealogy and the meaning of one controversial concept. Way, 1, 16-136.




How to Cite

Koberska, T., Panfilova, T., Kryhina, O., Ren, J., & Zinkevych, V. (2021). Historical Evolution of Knowledge: Interpretation of Truth in Postmodernism. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/280



Theoretical articles

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now