A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Anthropological Paradigms

Authors

  • Yurii STEZHKO National Aviation University
  • Vira DRABOVSKA Vinnytsia Cooperative Institute
  • Liudmyla GUSAK Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University
  • Elina KOLIADA Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University
  • Ilona DERIK State Institution "South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky"
  • Svitlana HRUSHKO State Institution "South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky"

Keywords:

individual, methodology, method, freedom, responsibility, arbitrariness, interest, education.

Abstract

Given the lack of effectiveness of verbal-and-figurative models and the “randomness” of personal education, the authors justify the need for constant involvement of philosophy in specific scientific research. Thus, philosophy can increase both the theoretical and applied level of their effectiveness in the long-term methodological perspective. The authors indicate that the incoherence of concepts characterizing personality is rather objective since it is connected with the incoherence of the research object, that is the person himself/herself, his / her individual and personal diversity which makes an unacceptable excessive emphasis on his / her positive qualities in the analysis. They also show the illegitimacy of limitations of specific research by an interdisciplinary methodology; point out to the shortcomings of applying of methods of interdisciplinary research in psycholinguistics, such as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. It must be noted that the range of their understanding has been expanded to achieve a higher level of reliability. Besides, the authors prove the inadmissibility of conclusions obtained mainly from superficial empirical studies without revealing and analyzing their underlying causes since it is a violation of the determinism principle. They substantiate the need to comply with the methodological principles of objectivity and systematicity while analyzing the concepts of the humanities block. Ignoring these principles can lead to electicity, and hence the inefficiency of specific scientific research. 

References

Bech, I. (2008). Vykhovannia osobystosti [Education of personality]. Kyiv: Lybid.

Bubnova, I., & Kazachenko, O. (2018). Dinamika smyislovogo soderjaniya znacheniya slova svoboda [Dynamics of the semantic content of the meaning of the word freedom]. Psycholinguistics, 23 (2), 1114. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/psling_2018_23_2_3

Freud, Z. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Retrieved from https://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FreudS-CIVILIZATION-AND-ITS-DISCONTENTS-text-final.pdf

Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11 (4), 345-361. http://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/1604/pdf

Helvetius, K. (1938). Ob ume [On the mind]. Moscow: Association of State Book and Magazine Publishers https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/istorija_prosveshhenie/gelvetsij-ob-ume-1938

Holbach, P.-H. (1963). Izbrannyie proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Мyisl. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/istorija_prosveshhenie/golbakh_izbrannye_proizvedenija_v_dvukh_tomakh_tom_1/11-1-0-58

Ilenkov, E. (1984). Dialekticheskaya logika: ocherki istori i teorii [Dialectical logic: essays of history and theory]. Moscow: Politizdat. http://psylib.org.ua/books/ilyen02/index.htm

Korniiaka, O. (2018). Osoblyvosti komunikatyvno-movlennievoi diialnosti vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly [Features of communicative-speech activity of a teacher of higher education]. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 183206. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32305852.pdf

Leontev, A. (1997 ). Osnovyi psiholingvistiki [Fundamentals of psycholinguistics] Moscow: Smyisl. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/leontiev-a-a-osnovy-psiholingvistiki-m-smysl-1997-287-s

Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O. … Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 51 (1), 46–93. https://ipisr.org.rs/images/pdf/zbornik-51/Natalija-Meljnik.pdf

Mizin, K. I. (2006). Kohnityvne pidgruntia onomasiolohichnoi struktury komparatyvnykh frazeolohizmiv yak movnoi universalii (na materiali nimetskoi ta ukrainskoi mov) [The cognitive basis of onomasiological structure of comparative phraseology as a linguistic universal (based on the material of German and Ukrainian)]. Linguistics, 5, 7380. http://catalog.library.tnpu.edu.ua:8080/library/DocDescription?doc_id=231698

Nerubasska, A., Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11 (2), 240-255. https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/2625

Nietzsche, F. (1990). Po tu storonu dobra i zla [On the other side of good and evil]. Moscow: Mysl. https://www.yakaboo.ua/ak-non-fiction-nicshe-f-po-tu-storonu-dobra-i-zla.html

Orlyk, S. & Stezhko, Z. (2019). “World Spirit” by Georg Hegel: from Universe to the History of Mankind. Philosophy and Cosmology, 23, 147157.

Sartre, J.-P. (2011). Existentialism is a humanism. Retrieved from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/complexity/people/students/dtc/students2011/maitland/philosophy/sartre-eih.pdf

Schweitzer, A. (2012). Teoriya perevoda (status, problemy, aspekty). Seryya: Iz lingvisticheskogo naslediya [Translation theory (status, problems, aspects). Series: From the Linguistic Heritage]. Moscow: Librokom. https://studfile.net/preview/4432226/

Sheremet M., Leniv Z., Loboda V., Maksymchuk B. (2019) The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education (2019). Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273-285. https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2561

Stezhko, Z. & Stezhко, Yu. (2018). Superechlyvist svobody ta paradoksy vidpovidalnosti (antropolohichnyi analiz) [Contradiction of freedom and paradoxes of responsibility (anthropological analysis)]. Anthropologіcal Measurements of Phіlosophical Research, 13, 5264, http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/131937

Vivas, L., Manoiloff, L., García, M., Lizarralde, F., & Vivas, J. (2019). Core semantic links or lexical associations: assessing the nature of responses in word association tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48 (1), 243–256. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-018-9601-8

Vonk, J., Oble, L., & Jonkers, R. (2019). Levels of abstractness in semantic noun and verb processing: the role of sensory-perceptual and sensory-motor information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48 (2), 1–15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-018-9621-4

Vygotsky, L. (1982). Sobranie sochinenii [The collection of works]. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Published

2021-04-29

How to Cite

STEZHKO, Y., DRABOVSKA, V., GUSAK, L., KOLIADA, E., DERIK, I., & HRUSHKO, S. (2021). A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Anthropological Paradigms. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1). Retrieved from https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/3246

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)