Communication Opportunities of Civil Society Institutions in Countering the Challenges of Post-Pandemic Postmodernity



communication capabilities, civil society institutions, security policy, post-pandemic consequences, society


The modern world space, which is affected by the post-pandemic consequences, is noted by the globalization of society, the increasing role of citizenship in making important state and international decisions has become possible in the context of the information revolution and has its own characteristics of communication in information and communication networks. The importance and need for a thorough study of the chosen topic is that the widespread use of various forms and methods of civil communication, free access of citizens to information at all stages of decision-making and the functioning of central and local governments, the participation of civil society institutions in the work of expert, consultative, and advisory public councils on the expression and protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens, public control, direct electronic receipt of public services, etc. are important factors in the democratization of government in post-pandemic modern times. After all, we are talking about a deliberate orientation to new values - the person and the collective, their direct participation in the democratic organization of life of the state and society. The main thing in this context is that the rational consensus of civil society and the state is a factor in universal social discourse and a strategic resource for democratic development in the context of post-pandemic modernity. The aim of the article is to consider the epistemological and sociocultural aspects of the functioning of the communication capabilities of civil society institutions in the context of revealing the possibility and significance of their involvement in the processes of implementing state security policy.


KATIN V. (2020) The new reality of the twenty-first century. Do non-governmental organizations undermine government? Deep Courier,. Vol 3, .33 p.

VILLANUEVA P. A. G. (2020) Chomu hromadyansʹke suspilʹstvo ne mozhe borotysya z tsym poodyntsi: roli seredovyshcha hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva, prozori zakony ta yakistʹ derzhavnoho upravlinnya v borotʹbi z politychnoyu koruptsiyeyu [Why Civil Society Cannot Battle it All Alone: The Roles of Civil Society Environment, Transparent Laws and Quality of Public Administration in Political Corruption Mitigation]. International Journal of Public Administration 43:6, 552-561.

ANHEIER H. K., SALAMON, L. M. (2006). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook. 90–114.

BOLLEYER N. (2014). The Regulation of Organizational Life in Advanced Democracies: Conceptual and Operational Challenges in Comparing ‘Organization-Relevant’ Regulation. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Salamanca, April 10-15

RAZZAQUE J., (2007) Transparency and Participation of Civil Society in International Institutions Related to Biotechnology. Participation for sustainability in trade, 137-160, Available at SSRN:

BLUMLER J. G., GUREVITCH M. (2005) Rethinking the Study of Political Communication In Mass Media and Society. London: Hodder Arnold. 104-121.

CASTELLS M. (2010) “Communication Power.” In Media and Society. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 3–17.

CURRAN, J. (2010) “Communication and Globalization.” In Rethinking Communication, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. 8–10.

DAVIS A. (2010) “Media and Politics.” In Media and Society, London: Bloomsbury Academic. 83–102.

HABERMAS J. (1974) “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article” New German Critique 3. 49–55.

MCINTOSH WHITE J. (2012) “The Communicative Action of Journalists and Public Information Officers: Habermas Revisited.” Journalism Practice Vol. 6(4). 563–580.

EDWARDS M. (2005) “Civil societyˮ, the encyclopedia of informal education

SMORGUNOV L.V. (2003) Porivnyalʹnyy analiz politychnykh ta administratyvnykh reform vid novoho upravlinnya derzhavoyu do kontseptsiyi "upravlinnya" [A comparative analysis of political and administrative reforms from the new state management to the concept of “Governanceˮ] Policy. Vol 4. 54-60.

WEBSTER F. (2011) “Information and Democracy: The Weakening of Social Democracy.” In Media Perspectives for the 21st Century, ed. Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos London: Routledge., 21–40.

NICOLA M, O’NEILL N, SOHRABI C, KHAN M, AGHA M. (2020) Evidence Based Management Guideline for the COVID-19 Pandemic - Int J Surg. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.001



How to Cite

MARCHUK, V., PAVLOVA, L., AHAFONOVA, H., VONSOVYCH, S., & SIMONIAN, A. (2021). Communication Opportunities of Civil Society Institutions in Countering the Challenges of Post-Pandemic Postmodernity. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1). Retrieved from



Research on Covid-19 Pandemic