Features of Decentralization Processes of Developed Countries in the Post-Pandemic Society





decentralization, political will to make decisions, civil society, crisis of governance, crisis of power, post-pandemic society


Globalization and rapid information processes that are inherent in today's post-pandemic society, contributing to the reorganization of the authorities of many countries and their contacts with regions, local territorial units or civil society. Such changes, first of all, provide for delegation of authority at the level of regional and local authorities.

However, many developing and today position their own society as post-modern, continue to be in a state of disunity of the branches of government, with a high level of corruption and abuse of official position, improper distribution of resources, inappropriate tax system and incompetent provision of services by relevant authorities. This affects the relevance of studying foreign experience in building a rational, effective, balanced public administration system, the leading place in which in almost all developed countries is the decentralization of the state and, above all, the executive branch. The foreign experience of the successful implementation of decentralization reforms is investigated. The main characteristics inherent in the decentralization of power in European countries are given, including in the context of the existence of a pandemic. The features of decentralization of power in France, the UK, Germany and other countries are highlighted. It is substantiated that the experience of decentralization reforms in each country is unique and reflects the specifics of the development of a particular country, and therefore it is impractical to introduce foreign experience without taking into account the particular economic and political development of a particular country.


Alesina, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Segregation and the quality of government in a cross-section of countries. American Economic Review, 101, 1872-1911. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1872

Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.009

Bahl, R. W. (2000). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developing and Transition Countries: Principles and Practice. World Bank.

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of government and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320951037

Bird, R. M., Ebel, R. D., & Wallich, C. I. (1995). Decentralization of the Socialist State. A Regional and Sectoral Study. World Bank Publications.

Blair, H. (2000). Participation and Accountability at the Periphery, Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development 28 (1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6

Dardanelli, P. (2014). European integration, party strategies, and state restructuring: A comparative analysis. European Political Science Review, 6(02), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000076

Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and Political Institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2261-2290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.006

Fan, S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001

Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4

Griffin, K. (1981). Economic Development in Changing World. World Development, 9(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(81)90027-9

Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How close is your government to its people? Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8, 1-61. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3

Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2011). Fiscal decentralization and government quality in the OECD. Economics Letters, 111, 191-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.019

Lago-Peñas, S., & García, A. (2017). Spanish fiscal decentralization: A successful (but still unfinished) process. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 35(8), 26-31. https://doi.org/1177/2399654417704663

Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31, 1095-1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182

Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal Economic Literature, 37, 1120-1149. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.37.3.1120

Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00020-1

Santagati, M., Bonini Baraldi, S., & Zan L. (2020). Understanding decentralization: deconcentration and devolution processes in the French and Italian cultural sectors. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(4), 435-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2019-0050

Sorens, J. (2009). The Partisan Logic of Decentralization in Europe. Regional and Federal Studies, 19(2), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560902753537




How to Cite

Kovalova, S., Koval, A., Panchenko, S., Pronina, O., & Bykov, R. (2021). Features of Decentralization Processes of Developed Countries in the Post-Pandemic Society. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 510-521. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/321



Research on Covid-19 Pandemic

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now