Futurology of Separatism and National Security: Being vs Dissipation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/303

Keywords:

cohesion of being, domestic world, separatism, national security, transgression, frontier

Abstract

The article considers the peculiarities of the “domestic” and political worlds’ interactions, as well as their impact on the freedom of human choice. The purpose of the article is to analyze the political and existential being, who can be transformed in a distracting way. The phenomenon of national security is analyzed in its theoretical, as well as in its practical dimension.

The first part of the study of separatism is connected with the modern social world’s tendency towards social transgression, which involves blurring the rules and limits expansion. The concept of the “frontier”, as a transgressive space, can be embodied in the form of a possibility for political interaction or as a place for political conflict. Understanding the concept of “frontier” in the light of a cultural dialogue permits us to consider it as a dynamic system in perspective, in the social projects of constructing the common being.

The second part of the article reveals three main directions of transgression: philosophical and reflexive, ethical and normative, and common practices. Reflection is developed and argumented starting from the idea of an existing correlation between freedom of choice, manifestation of will and the human ability of critical thinking. Tolerance is defined to be a strategical practice in the process of launching a dialogue program for conflicting political communication.

Author Biographies

Bogdan Levyk, L’viv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Senior Scientists, Director of Regional Scientific and Educational Center “Holodomor, Holocaust, International Dialogue

Marina Kolinko, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Philosophy Department

Svitlana Khrypko, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Philosophy Department

Ganna Iatsenko, Admiral Makarov National Shipbuilding University

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Philosophy and Cultural Studies Department

References

Abramov, V. I., & Afonina, O. G. (2012). Natsionalna bezpeka yak filosofska kategoria [National Security as Philosophical Category]. Academy.gov. http://academy.gov.ua/ej/ej11/txts/10avibfk.pdf

Aleksandrova, O., Khrypko, S., & Iatsenko, G. (2020). Solitude as a Problem of Human’s Mature Choice. BEYTULHIKME. An International Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 771–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1582

Bystrytskyi, E. (2018). Ekzystetsijna istyna i postpravda [Existential Truth and Post-truth]. Filosofska Dumka, 5, 54-71. http://bystrytsky.org/existen18.htm

Dzyaloshinskii, J. (2002). Predislovie k materialam nautchno-practicheskoi konferentsii “Tolerantnost’ i multiculturalism kak orientiry professionalnogo povedenia pressy” [Introduction to the Materials of Scientific Conference “Tolerance and Mutli-culturalism as the Guidelines of the Press Professional Behavior”]. Tolerance.ru. http://www.tolerance.ru/RP-pred.php?PrPage=MKO

Eliade, M. (1994). Sviaschennoe i mirskoye [Sacred and Profane]. Moscow.

Eremenko, L. O. (2014). Yavliaetsa li Donbass Ukrainskoi Vandeyei ili Separatism pod kopirku. Vzgliad s Vostoka [Whether Donbass is Ukrainian Vendée or Separatism on Carbon Paper. A View from the East]. Ostrov.org. http://www.ostro.org/lugansk/culture/articles/460641/

Godfrey-Smith, P. & Kerr, B. (2019). Tolerance: A Hierarchical Analysis. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 27(4), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12178

Hodgson, G. M. (1991). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Polity.

Husserl, E. (2004). Krisis evropeiskich nauk i transcedentalnaya fenomenologia [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology] (D. V. Skliadnev Trans.). Vladimir Dal.

Jenks, C. (2003). Transgression. Key Ideas. Routledge.

Khrypko, S., & Iatsenko, G. (2019). Philosophy of a Name: Ukrainian. BEYTULHIKME. An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(2), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1477

Khrypko, S., Aleksandrova, O., Iatsenko, G., Ishchuk, A., & Shcherbakova, N. (2020). Dialogue of Generations as Communicative Dimension of Bread Culture Semantics in the Ukrainian Sacral Tradition. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(4), 333-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i4.2792

Lavruchin, A. (2018). Politicheskoye izmerenie fenomenologii E. Gusserlia v svete kritiki F. Fellmanna, H. Arendt i Yu. Habermasa [Political Dimension of E. Husserl’s Phenomenology in the Light of F. Fellmann, H. Arendt and J. Habermas Critics]. Horizon, 7(2). 365–390. https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-2-365-390

Levyk, B., Aleksandrova, O., Khrypko, S., & Iatsenko, G. (2020). Geo-policy and Geo-psychology as Cultural Determinants of Ukrainian Religion, Mentality, and National Security. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 217-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2761

Mamardashvili, M. (1996). Vvedenie v filosofiu [Introduction to Philosophy. Online Publication: the Center of Humanitarian Technologies]. Gtmarket.ru. https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5501/5504

Meyer-Abich, K. M. (2004). Povstanie na zachyst pryrody. Vid dovkillia do spilnosvitu [Revolution for Nature: From the Environment to the Connatural World] (A. Ermolenko Trans.). Libra.

Postol, A. (2010). Postmodernism yak sutchasna suspilno-politychna realnist’ [Postmodernism as Modern Social and Political Reality]. Gumanitarnyi Vistnyk ZDIA, 42, 69-79. http://www.zgia.zp.ua/gazeta/VISNIK_42_8.pdf

Savin, O. (2006). Zyznennyi mir i izmerenia ego istorichnosti v transcedentalnoy fenomenologii [The Life World and its Historical Dimensions in Transcendental Phenomenology]. Vestnik SamGu, 10/1(50), 15–22. http://vestniksamgu.ssau.ru/gum/2006web10-1/phyl/1-2.pdf

Tolkachev, S. (2013). Problemy gibridnoi identichnosti v sovremennoy multikulturnoy literature [Problems of Hybrid Identity in Modern Multi-Cultural Literature]. Problemy filologii, kulturologii and iskustvoznania, 2, 177–182. http://www.zpu-journal.ru/zpu/contents/2013/2/Tolkachev_Problems-Hybrid-Identity/28_2013_2.pdf

Waldenfels, B. (2004). Topographia Chuzogo: studii do fenomenologii [Topography of Alien: Studies to Phenomenology] (V. I. Kebuladze Trans.). Kyiv.

Yereskova, T., Mazuryk, O., Tymofieieva, H., & Opryshko, T. (2020). Social Activity of Contemporary Ukrainian Society: Threat to Internal Stability or Possibility of Social Dialogue. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 144 -173. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/227

Zenkin, S. (2019). Posleslovie k transgressii [Afterword to Transgression]. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zurnal“Logos”, 29(2), 51–63. http://www.logosjournal.ru/arch/106/Logos%202-2019_Press-57-69.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-07-01

How to Cite

Levyk, B., Kolinko, M., Khrypko, S., & Iatsenko, G. (2021). Futurology of Separatism and National Security: Being vs Dissipation. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/303

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)


Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now