The Training of Future Teachers for Innovative Teaching Activities

Authors

  • Lyudmila Shevchenko Myhailo Kotsyubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University
  • Nataliia Makhynia Cherkasy State Technological University
  • Ganna Polishchuk Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University
  • Halyna Sotska Ivan Ziaziun Institute of Pedagogical Education and Adult Education of NAPS Ukraine
  • Valentyna Koval Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Tetiana Grygorenko Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/243

Keywords:

technology teachers, innovative pedagogical activity, information and communication technologies, model, eLearning

Abstract

The conceptual and methodological principles of future technology teachers’ training to the innovative pedagogical activities in terms of the postmodern approach are scientifically argued and developed in the article. It is proved that their training becomes effective if it is carried out according to the defined theoretical and methodological bases of the search, taking into account the main directions of reforming the system of higher pedagogical education in the context of innovative development of Ukraine. The essence and content of readiness of future teachers of technologies for innovative pedagogical activity are revealed, components (motivational, cognitive, activity-technological, and creative-reflexive), criteria, indicators, and levels of its formation are defined.

The pedagogical conditions of training of future teachers of technologies for innovative pedagogical activity are substantiated; theoretically developed and experimentally tested component model of the professionally-oriented educational environment of pedagogical free economic zone and structural-functional model of training of future teachers of technologies for innovative pedagogical activity.

The effectiveness of the gradual introduction of methods of training future teachers of technology to innovative pedagogical activities through the use of developed methodological support and improvement of content, forms, methods, and means of educational interaction of subjects and objects of educational process environment of pedagogical higher educational establishments was experimentally tested and confirmed using the methods of mathematical statistics.

References

Adan Salas-Rueda, R., Pozos-Cuellar, R., Calvo-Palmerin, U., & Fernando Cardenas-Zubieta, M. (2018). Use of the social network as a technological-pedagogical tool in the higher education process. Espiral-Cuadernos Del Profesorado, 11(23), 141-152. DOI:10.25115/ecp.v12i23.2114.

Alimisis, D. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics: The ROBOESL Project paradigm. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 279-290. DOI: 10.1007/s10758-018-9357-0.

Antonio Balladares-Burgos, J. (2018). Instructional design of digital education for teacher training. Revista Latinoamericana De Tecnologia Educativa-Relatec, 17(1), 41-60. DOI:10.17398/1695-288X.17.1.41.

Bakshayeva, N. A., & Verbitskiy, A. A. (2006). Psikhologiya motivatsii studentov [Psychology of student motivation]. Moscow: Logos. [In Russian].

Banerjee, R., & Seshaiyer, P. (2019). Challenges in school mathematics curriculum reform in India: transforming teacher practices through pedagogical innovations. In School Mathematics Curricula (pp. 227-237). Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6312-2_12.

Bernal-Guerrero, A. (2009). Cyberworld and education. Draft for a new educational frame in postmodern contexts. Teoria De La Educacion, 21(1), 71-102

Burden, K., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Burke, P. (2019). Principles underpinning innovative mobile learning: Stakeholders’ priorities. TechTrends, 63(6), 659-668. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-019-00415-0.

Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Evaluating teacher and student spatial transition from a traditional classroom to an innovative learning environment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 156-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.004.

Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Kassab, D. (2018). High school students’ reasons for their science dispositions: community-based innovative technology-embedded environmental research projects. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1341-1365. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-018-9735-6.

Hernández-Serrano, M. J., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. M. (2020). Interest in STEM disciplines and teaching methodologies. Perception of secondary school students and preservice teachers. Educar, 56(2), 369-386. DOI: 10.5565/rev/educar.1065.

Karpov, A. V. (2003). Refleksivnost' kak psikhicheskoye svoystvo i metodika yeye diagnostiki [Reflexivity as a mental property and a technique for its diagnosis]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 24(5), 45-57. [In Russian].

Krzychała, S. (2020). Teacher Responses to New Pedagogical Practices: A Praxeological Model for the Study of Teacher-Driven School Development. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 979-1013. DOI: 10.3102/0002831219868461.

Lopez Belmonte, J., Pozo Sanchez, S., Fuentes Cabrera, A., & Lopez Nunez, J. A. (2019). Content creation and flipped learning: a necessary pairing for education in the new millennium. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 77(274), 535-555. DOI: 10.22550/REP77-3-2019-07.

Marta-Lazo, C., Frau-Meigs, D., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2019). A collaborative digital pedagogy experience in the tMOOC “Step by Step”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 111-127. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.4215.

Neira Piñeiro, M. D. R., Fombella Coto, I., & Moral Pérez, M. E. D. (2019). Didactic-creative potentiality of a picture book enriched with digital resources and augmented reality. Edmetic, 8(2), 108-128. DOI: 10.21071/edmetic.v8i2.11567.

O’Connor, A., Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2018). The experiential domain: Developing a model for enhancing practice in D&T education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 85-99. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-016-9378-8.

Pashkevich, K., Yezhova, O., & Gerasymenko, O. (2020). Use of information and communication technologies for organizing self-education of personality in the field of clothes design. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 76 (2), 58-69. DOI:10.33407/itlt.v76i2.2800.

Pedro, A., Piedade, J., Matos, J. F., & Pedro, N. (2019). Redesigning initial teacher’s education practices with learning scenarios. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 266-283. DOI: 10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0131.

Pérez, J. J. R., Zea, M. P. C., & Ocampo, E. D. (2018). Digital Competences: a need for the Ecuadorian teacher of The XXI century. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valore, 6(SI), 32. URL: https://search.proquest.com/openview/6d3ec52ecf5f47f6289f5e817fb06249/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=4400984.

Ricardo-Barreto, C. T., Molinares, D. J., Llinás, H., Santodomíngo, J. M. P., Acevedo, C. M. A., Rodríguez, P. D. A., Navarro C. P. B., & Villa, S. M. V. (2020). Trends in Using ICT Resources by Professors in HEIs (Higher Education Institutions). Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 395-425. DOI: 10.28945/4601.

Sansone, N., & Ritella, G. (2020). "Increased" teacher training: integration of methodologies and technologies at the service of socio-constructivist teaching. QWERTY, 15(1), 70-88. DOI: 10.30557/QW000023.

Shevchenko, L. S. (2018). Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv tekhnolohii do innovatsiinoi pedahohichnoi diyalnosti. [Future technology teachers training for innovative pedagogical activity]. Vinnytsia: Druk. [In Ukrainian].

Sousa, E. P., de Sales, A. L., Da Silva, J. D. P., Lemos, D. M., & França, E. T. S. S. (2019). Formação pedagógica do tecnólogo para atuação como docente no instituto federal do amapá–campus macapá. Holos, 35 (1), UNSP e6899. DOI: 10.15628/holos.2019.6899.

Stezhko, Y. G. (2019). Vision of information in the computer oriented educational technologies and its explication in the imperatives of postmodernism. Information technologies and learning tools, 71(3), 12-22. DOI: 10.33407/itlt. v71i3.2331.

Yezhova, O.V., Pashkevich, K. L., & Gryn, D. V. (2019). Development of technology students’ ICT competence while teaching computer-aided fashion design. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 73(5), 15-27. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v73i5.2547.

Young, F., Cleveland, B., & Imms, W. (2019). The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: educators’ and architects’ perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(4), 693-720. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-019-00354-y/.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-19

How to Cite

Shevchenko, L., Makhynia, N., Polishchuk, G. ., Sotska, H. ., Koval, V., & Grygorenko, T. . (2021). The Training of Future Teachers for Innovative Teaching Activities. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/243

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Postmodern Openings

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND

CC_BY_NC_ND