Freedom or Arbitrariness: A Social and Philosophic Analysis


  • Zoia STEZHKO Central Ukrainian National Technical University
  • Nina HRYSHCHENKO Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs Ukraine
  • Valentyna KULTENKO National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • Inna SAVYTSKA National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • Alina SUPRUN National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • Nadiia RUSKO Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas



lack of restrictions, effective development, models of upbringing, philosophical and political discourse, spontaneous absolutization, persistence of power


The freedom theme has always been in the centre of life and philosophical and political discourse. Freedom is one of the magic words causing many positive emotions in everyday life. Certain social and philosophical studies highlight the ways of replacing traditional and, sometimes, spontaneous absolutization of human freedom at an empirical level of social consciousness. It lies in achieving desired results and being entitled to choose what to achieve. The difference between these “formulas” is obvious. In the second case, one can observe one's acceptance of certain restrictions of freedom due to social reality and understanding that it can only be fully realized through self-restraint. However, one needs to come to such conclusions on one’s own. Practice shows that the categorical power of authorities in terms of citizens’ duties mostly leads to opposite results. Therefore, more than ever, it is essential to develop a permanent, well-developed, multi-level humanitarian programme for working with the population based on social and philosophical studies. The state needs to build the “net” of permanent special state-owned institutions since it will improve the quality of public administration, pave the way for tolerance and successful compromises. The ultimate goal of this article is to form a conscious (rational) civic position and self-determination as a result of one’s full awareness of responsibility for one’s decisions.


Bubnova, I., & Kazachenko, O. (2018). Dinamika smyislovogo soderjaniya znacheniya slova svoboda [Dynamics of the semantic content of the meaning of the word freedom]. Psycholinguistics, 23(2), 11-14.

Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. CIVILIZATION-AND-ITS-DISCONTENTS-text-final.pdf.

Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11 (4), 345-361.

Hegel G.V. F. (1977). Filosofija religii [Philosophy of Religion]. M., T. 2.

Helvetius, K. (1938). Ob ume [On the mind]. Moscow: Association of State Book and Magazine Publishers.

Hobbes T. (1989) O svobode y neobkhodymosty [On freedom and necessity] T. 1. M .: Mysl.

Holbach, P.-H. (1963). Izbrannyie proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Мyisl.

Holm, D. V. (2019). Between ‘freedom as autonomy’ and ‘freedom as potentiality’. Conjunctions Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 6(1).

Khmil, V. (2016). Ambiguous Janus of modern democracy. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 9, 47-54.

Maksymchuk, B., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Davydenko, H., Soichuk, R., Khurtenko, O., Groshovenko, O., Stepanchenko, N., Andriychuk, Y., Grygorenko, T., Duka, T., Pidlypniak, I., Gurevych, R., Kuzmenko, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Developing Healthcare Competency in Future Teachers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 24-43.

Matlasevich O. (2013). Kontseptsiia osobystisnoi svobody v konteksti khrystyianskoi psykholohii [The concept of personal freedom in the context of Christian psychology] Proceedings. Psychology and Pedagogy Series, 23, 157-170.

Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O. … Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 51 (1), 46–93.

Nerubasska, A., Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11 (2), 240-255.

Nietzsche, F. (1990). Po tu storonu dobra i zla [On the other side of good and evil]. Moscow: Mysl.

Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65.

Orlyk, S., & Stezhko, Z. (2019). “World Spirit” by Georg Hegel: from universe to the history of mankind. Philosophy and Cosmology, 23, 147-157.

Orlyk, V., & Orlyk, S. (2019). Teoretyko-metodolohichni ta dzhereloznavchi problemy ekonomichnoi istorii Ukrainy [Theoretical-methodological and source-studying problems of the Economic history of Ukraine] The Universe of History and Archeology, Vol. 2(27). Issue 2, 5–26.

Osyadla M.(2016). Svoboda yak tsinnist prava (teoretyko-pravovyi aspect) [Freedom as a value of law (theoretical and legal aspect)] Candidate’s thesis. Kiev.

Sartre, J.-P. (2011). Existentialism is a humanism. Retrieved from

Schopenhauer А. (2000). O svobode voly [About free will]. Minsk; Kharkov.

Sheremet M., Leniv Z., Loboda V., Maksymchuk B. (2019) The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273-285.

Spinoza B. (2001). Еtika [Ethics]. - Minsk: Harvest.

Stezhko, Z. & Shalimova, N. (2016). Qualitative Characteristics of the Auditor’s Report. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(4), 8495.

Stezhko, Z., & Stezhко, Yu. (2018). Superechlyvist svobody ta paradoksy vidpovidalnosti (antropolohichnyi analiz) [Contradiction of freedom and paradoxes of responsibility (anthropological analysis)]. Anthropologіcal Measurements of Phіlosophical Research, 13, 5264,

Vygotsky, L. (1982). Sobranie sochinenii [The collection of works]. Moscow: Pedagogika.




How to Cite

STEZHKO, Z., HRYSHCHENKO, N., KULTENKO, V., SAVYTSKA, I., SUPRUN, A., & RUSKO, N. (2021). Freedom or Arbitrariness: A Social and Philosophic Analysis. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 354-366.



Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now