Personal Responsibility as a Problem of Development of Postmodern Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/396Keywords:
entrepreneurial activity, profit orientation, responsibility to society, American model, European model, social entrepreneurshipAbstract
Considering entrepreneurial activity from the psychological perspective, primarily it is worth to give an answer to the question of what fundamental, ultimate purpose of entrepreneurship is. In the conceptual and theoretical aspect, two opposite points of view are distinguished: the first recognizes focusing of the entrepreneurship mainly on profit subject to obeying existing laws, the second considers business entities as members of society, who bear personal responsibility to society for their behaviour. However, since laws cannot cover all life events, entrepreneurs are obliged to comply with the requirements of the rules of socially responsible behaviour in order to maintain a society based on order and legality. Scientists identify a number of stages that the company goes through before realizing: corporate social responsibility is a tool for creating new value. The first step to the introduction of strategic innovations in companies is to harmonize compliance with the law. Actually, a social company should do this by definition. The second step is when companies begin to realize the need to engage in strategic philanthropy. Thus, corporate funds are established. The third stage is to create mechanisms of self-regulation based on values. The next stage is the direct material benefits from strategic innovations. This is most often the result of increased efficiency. At the last stage, conceptually new products are created, new markets are opened. It is important that strategic innovations through social responsibility are mostly aimed at creating new products and services and are a source of income.
References
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K.A. (1980). Deyatelnost i psikhologiya lichnosti [Activity and personality psychology]. Nauka. https://www.studmed.ru/abulhanova-slavskaya-ka-deyatelnost-i-psihologiya-lichnosti_4cf36e848c9.html
Biletska, L.V., Biletsky, O.V., & Savych, V.I. (2009). Ekonomichna teoriya (Politekonomiya. Mikroekonomika. Makroekonomika) [Economic theory (Political economy. Microeconomics. Macroeconomics)]. Textbook. 2nd edition, revised and supplemented. Center for Educational Literature. http://ктеп.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/bilets_ka_l_v_bilets_kiy_o_v_savich_v_i_ekonomichna_teoriya.pdf
Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the Adolescent Brain: Implications for Executive Function and Social Cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3-4), 296-312. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16492261/
Carroll, A.B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19-46). Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282746355_A_History_of_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Concepts_and_Practices
Croitor, E. (2014). Ethics of Responsibility. Some Postmodern Views. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 253-260. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814049398.
Dementiy, L.I. (1995). Tipologiya otvetstvennosti. Gumanisticheskiye problemy psikhologicheskoy teorii [Typology of responsibility. Humanistic problems of psychological theory]. Moscow.
Frankl, V. (2000). Osnovy logoterapii. Psikhoterapiya i religiya [Fundamentals of Logotherapy. Psychotherapy and Religion]. Rech. https://www.livelib.ru/work/1002399533-osnovy-logoterapii-psihologiya-i-religiya-viktor-frankl
Ivannikov, V.A. (2006). Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy volevoy regulyatsii [Psychological mechanisms of volitional regulation]. Piter. https://obuchalka.org/2017070995323/psihologicheskie-mehanizmi-volevoi-regulyacii-ivannikov-v-a-2006.html
Jamali, D., Sidani, Y., & El-Asmar, K. (2009). A Three Country Comparative Analysis of Managerial CSR Perspectives: Insights From Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 173-192. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41315824
Khachaturov, R.L., & Lipinsky, D.A. (2007). Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [General theory of legal responsibility]. Legal Center Press. http://lawlibrary.ru/izdanie2237906.html
Krasivsky, O. (2017). Hlobalizatsiia ta identychnist natsionalnoi kultury [Globalization and identity of national culture]. Efficiency of public administration, 4(53), 13-20. https://kbuapa.kh.ua/wp-content/
themes/education/filesforpages/science/DISERT_Kovalyova.pdf
Kredentser, O.V. (2009). Psykholohichni umovy pidhotovky pidpryyemtsiv do profesiynoyi diyalnosti u sferi torhivelʹnoho biznesu [Psychological conditions of training of businessmen for professional activity in the sphere of trade business] [Dissertation abstract, Kyiv]. https://clck.ru/Wucqz
Leontiev, A.N. (1975). Deyatelnost. Soznaniye. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Politizdat. https://www.marxists.org/russkij/leontiev/1975/dyeatyelnost/deyatyelnost-soznyanie-lichnost.pdf
Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1-7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: the case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 283-297. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1006262325211
Maslow, A. (1990). Dalneyshiye rubezhi razvitiya cheloveka [Further frontiers of human development] (V. Danchenko, Trans.). The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1. http://psylib.org.ua/books/vsr0290/txt01.htm
Mergler, A., Spencer, F.H., & Patton, W. (2007). Relationships between Personal Responsibility, Emotional Intelligence, and Self-esteem in Adolescents and Young Adults. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 24, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0816512200029060
Minkina, N.A. (1990). Vospitaniye otvetstvennost'yu [Education by responsibility]. Moscow. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001534509
Mudzibayev, K. (1983). Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of responsibility]. Nauka.
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Nivethigha, R.P., Divyabharathi, S., Velmurugan, B. (2017). Business ethics, values and social responsibility to an entrepreneur. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 4(1), 18-21. http://ijrmbs.com/vol4issue1/nivethigha.pdf
Palamarchuk, O., Gurevych, R., Maksymchuk, B., Gerasymova, I., Fushtey, O., Logutina, N., Kalashnik, N., Kylivnyk, A., Haba, I., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Studying Innovation as the Factor in Professional Self-Development of Specialists in Physical Education and Sport. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/337
Perls, F.S., Hefferime, R., & Goodman, P. (1993). Opyty psikhologii samopoznaniya (praktikum po geshtal't-terapii) [Experiments in the psychology of self-knowledge (workshop on gestalt therapy)] (M. Papushe Gil-Este, Trans.). GilEstel. https://www.phantastike.com/geshtalt/practic_of_selfexploring/html/
Plakhotny, A.F. (1981). Problema sotsial'noy otvetstvennosti [The problem of social responsibility]. Vishcha shkola.
Rean, A.A. (1999). Psikhologiya izucheniya lichnosti: uchebnoye posobiye [Psychology of personality study]: a textbook. Publishing house of Mikhailov.
Rogers, K. (2007). Kliyent-tsentrovana psykhoterapiya. Teoriya, suchasna praktyka i zastosuvannya [Client-centered psychotherapy. Theory, modern practice and application]. Psychotherapy.
Rotter, J., Sullivan, G., & Michelle, W. (2007). Teoriya mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniy i kognitivnyye teorii lichnosti [Theory of interpersonal relations and cognitive theories of personality]. Prime-EVROZNAK.
Rubinshtein, S.L. (2002). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Piter Kom. http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/rubinshteyn=osnovu_obzhey_psc.pdf
Samoukin, A.I., & Samoukina, N.V. (2001). Ekonomika i psikhologiya biznesa [Economics and psychology of business]. Phoenix.
Sartre, J.P. (2001). Buttya i nishcho: narys fenomenolohichnoyi ontolohiyi [Being and nothing: an essay on phenomenological ontology]. Osnovy.
Vieira, I., Jorge, M.J., & Prudêncio, M. (2010). Corporate governance, ethics and social responsibility: Comparing continental European and Anglo-Saxon firms. https://clck.ru/WtrSY
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND