International Rankings of Macro-Social Dynamics

Authors

  • Vladimir Petrovich Vasiliev PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology of Public Administration, Faculty of Sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/258

Keywords:

sustainable development, well-being, quality of life, standard of living, international rankings

Abstract

The implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Lisbon Strategy sets the task of a comprehensive study of the citizens` well-being, determining the state and trends in the level and quality of life not only by traditional methods of social statistics, but also through comprehensive sociological research. This approach has significant advantages since it allows us to generalize the state of social development of a society based on the population`s opinions, to study the emerging social risks that concern the population, to determine the differentiation of countries by indicators of well-being. The foundations of the new approach to the analysis of social processes were laid by the scientific achievements of the 60s of the last century. The dominant paradigm was the economic goals and parameters of statistically measured national income, household income, wages and their differentiation. The environmental risks that threaten the future of civilization were identified and analyzed in the 70s of the XX century. The production contradiction, which raised the question of measuring the quality of life in a new way, was articulated. The economic component (economic growth) was mixed and replaced with the welfare parameter. The sustainable development, including the indicators of well-being, the fight against poverty, and the environment were declared to be the goals of the society. The tasks of monitoring the solution of these problems are solved by sociological research, whose mathematical formalization can become a structural element of economic and mathematical modeling of social processes.

References

Alber, J., Delhey, J.; Keck, W., Nauenburg, R., Fahey, T., Maître, B., Whelan, C. T., Anderson, R., Domański, H., Ostrowska, A., Olagnero, M., & Saraceno, C. (2004). Quality of life in Europe. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2005/quality-of-life/quality-of-life-in-europe

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' of quality. Plenum

Bauer, R. (Ed.). (1966). Social indicators. MIT Press.

Becker, G.S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition. The University of Chicago Press,

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. Basic Books

Bourdieu, P. (1992). Ökonomisches Kapital – Kulturelles Kapital – Soziales Kapital [Economic Capital, Cultural Capital – Social Capital]. In: Die verborgenen Mechanismen der Macht. Hamburg.

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation,

Clark, J., & Bates, J. (1908). The distribution of wealth: a theory of wages, interest and profits. The Macmillan Company,

Country ranking. (n.d.). https://russian.doingbusiness.org/ru/rankings

Forrester, J.W. (1971). World Dynamics. Pegasus Communications.

Lucas, R. E. (1988). Оn the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/docs/darcillon-thibault/lucasmechanicseconomicgrowth.pdf

Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., Meadows, D.L., & Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books.

Munck, R. (2005). Globalization and Social Exclusion: a Transformationalist Perspective. Kumarian Press

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). How is life? 2020. Measuring Well-Being. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/how-s-life-2020_7185aa8b-en].

Perroux, F. (1947). Le Revenu national: son calcul et sa signification (avec Pierre Uri et al.) [The National Income: its calculation and its significance (with Pierre Uri et al.)]. Presses universitaires de France.

Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan and Co.

President of the Russian Federation. (2020, July 21). On the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202007210012

Renshaw, G. (2005). Math’s for Economics. Oxford University Press.

Silver, H. (2007). The process of social exclusion: the dynamics of an evolving concept. Working Paper 95, Manchester: IDPM/Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC). https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/128271/CP_2006_Silver.pdf

Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65—94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884513?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn`t Add Up. New Press.

UNITED NATIONS (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/2015/08/transforming-our-world-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development/

United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2020

Weber, M. (1934). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus [The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Tübingen.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-23

How to Cite

Vasiliev, V. P. . (2021). International Rankings of Macro-Social Dynamics. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 252-266. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/258

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)