Determination Of The Main Ways To Improve The Efficiency Of Higher Education Institutions In A Post-Pandemic Context
Keywords:efficiency, COVID-19, postpandemic, insitutions, main ways, education
The article highlights the problem of the effectiveness of the learning process in higher education institutions in the post-pandemic. Today there are changes in the labor market, and more and more professions need to be updated. This affects the quality of higher education both in Europe and elsewhere, so many higher educational institutions (national, public, private) have appeared, which primarily care about the number of students, and not about quality. In an environment where the pandemic has significantly changed the learning process, it is very important to find new ways to improve its effectiveness. Now there is a transition from an industrial society to a society of obtaining knowledge in conditions of post-pandemic development; This means that there is a transition to mass education, and then to general higher education (coverage of more than 70% of young people) and the need to train a large number of people with average abilities. In addition, in higher educational institutions, in particular in universities, there are still imperfect academic programs in the basics of science, compiled by teachers with different levels of training in the context of post-pandemic development.
Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S. (2012). Perception of education quality in private universities of Bangladesh: A study from students’ perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2012.705792
Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S. (2016) Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different?, Ope Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 52-67.https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
Arora, A. K., & Srinivansen, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching-learning process: A study of higher education teachers. Parabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825
Ashraf, M. A., Ibrahim, Y., & Joarder, M. H. (2009). Quality education management at private universities in Bangladesh: An exploratory study. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 24, 17–32. http://apjee.usm.my/APJEE_24_2009/JPP24_02_MohammadAshraf_17-32.pdf
Bertolin, J. C. G. (2011). The quasi-markets in higher education: From the improbable perfectly competitive markets to the unavoidable state regulation. Educação e Pesquisa, 37(2), 237–248. https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/LNYCRLGLzr9cP9YPvgttFCK/?format=pdf&lang=en
Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9124-6
Buchanan, J. (2011). Quality teaching: Means for its enhancement? Australian Universities’ Review, 53(1), 66–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ926451.pdf
Chaichumpa, S. & Wicha, S. & Temdee, P. (2021). Personalized Learning in a Virtual Learning Environment Using Modification of Objective Distance. Wireless Personal Communications, 118, 2055–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08126-7
El Refae, G. A., Kaba, A. & Eletter, S. (2021). Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0128
Jerez, O. & Orsini, C. & Hasbun, B. & Lobos, E., & Bornand, M. (2017). Is Undergraduate Programme Accreditation Influenced by Educational Public Policy Quality Indicators? An Exploratory Study of the Chilean Higher Education Quality Assurance System. Higher Education Policy, 31. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0046-8
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
Longanecker, D. A., & Blanco, C. D. (2003). Public policy implications of changing student attendance patterns. New Directions for Higher Education, 121, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.101
Maureen, T. (2002). Measuring the effect of higher education on university students. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(4), 223-228 https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210446893
Messo, I., N. (2014). Students’ Perception on the Quality of Open and Distance Learning Programmes In Tanzania. Journal of the Open Univerisity of Tanzania, 18(1), 119-134. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/huria/article/view/118923
Nadiri, H., Kandampully, J., & Hussain, K. (2009). Students’ perceptions of service quality in higher education. Total Quality Management, 20(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360902863713
Rahman, A. U., & Uddin, S. (2009). Statistical analysis of different socio economic factors affecting education of NW. FP. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 4(1), 88–94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ835627.pdf
Sarpkaya, R. (2010). Factors affecting individual education demand at the entrance to university: Adnan Menderes university sample. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(1), 475–488. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ882733.pdf
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs