Bioethics as an Anthropological Challenge


  • Ludmila Кondratska Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • Liudmila Romanovska Khmelnitsky National University, Khmelnitsky, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Kravchyna Khmelnytsky National University, Khmelnytsky, Ukraine
  • Nataliia Korolova National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsa, Ukraine
  • Kateryna Oliynyk Khmelnitsky National University, Khmelnitsky, Ukraine



bioethics, soteriological mission, medical anthropology, anthropological competence, hermeneutic and semantic didactics, agogic principles in trans-human settings


The subject of the proposed paper is the disclosure of prerequisites and determinants of the implementation of the soteriological concept of studying the interdisciplinary course of bioethics, the structural model and synectic algorithm of its comprehension and epistemological map of formation of soteriological competence of the future specialist during the study of bioethics. The methodological basis for the implementation of the proposed project is the theory of research-oriented professional education (Inquiry Based Science Education) and, thereafter, technology of advanced learning (Technology Enhanced Learning), which provide wide opportunities to study the course of bioethics in the form of observation of remote virtual experiments on the portal Go-Lab; GRAASP environment for the implementation of author's developments and pedagogically structured programs in the process of performative interaction between teacher and students. The scientific novelty of the material is to substantiate the content of anthropological competencies of future specialists in biomedical specialties and the strategies of obtaining them on the basis of the principles of hermeneutic didactics. Conclusions. Today, obviously, the task of bioethics is not only to protect nature and human life, but also to participate in the realization of the high mission of Salvation. This defines the research field of bioethics as a space of secret dialogue, in which it is desirable to find a place not only for the voice of clinicians, pharmacists, engineers, philosophers, public figures, but also the pastoral voice of the Church.



Berdyaeev, N. A. (2006). O naznachenii cheloveka [On the Purpose of Man]. Khranitel.

Birmingham, C. (2004). Phronesis: A Model for Pedagogical Reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 313-324.

Bostrom, N. (2019). The Vulnerable World Hypothesis. Global Policy, 10(4), 455–476.

Coleman, C. (2019). Beyond Research with Human Participants: Rethinking the Regulating Triggers for Prospective Ethics Review. The journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47, 247-253.

Darnell, C., Gulliford, L., Kristjánsson, K., & Paris, P. (2019). Phronesis and the knowledge – action gap in moral psychology and moral education: A new synthesis? Human Development, 62(3), 101–129

Engelhardt, H. T. (2020). Moral', tradiciya i blagodat': pereosmyslenie vozmozhnosti hristianskoj bioetiki [Morality, tradition and grace: rethinking the opportunity of christian bioethics]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, religion, church in Russia and abroad], 38(4), 44-66.

Fisch, M. (2018). An Anthropology of the Machine: Tokyo’s Commuter Train Network. University of Chicago Press.

Horužij, S. (2008). The Problem of the Posthuman, or Transformative Anthropology through the Eyes of Synergetic Anthropology. Philosophical Sciences, 2, 10-31.

Humanity Plus. (n.d.)

Kurzweil, R. (2012). How To Create A Mind. Viking Adult.

Lapsley, D. (2019). Phronesis, virtues and the developmental science of character. Human Development, 62(3), 130–141.

Lock, M. M., Nguyen, V.K. (2018). An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Macklin, R. J. (2015). Can one do good medical ethics without principles? Med Ethics, 41, 75–78.

Metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh. (2000). The Comforter: our Support and Strength for Mission. The Gift of the Holy Spirit: The Church as a Continual Pentecost. St Stephen’s Press.

More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (pp. 1-17). Wiley Online Library.

Palmer, J. A., & Palmer, L. K. (2002). Evolutionary psychology: the ultimate origins of human behavior. Allyn and Bacon.

Pearce, D. (2012). The Biointelligence Explosion: How Recursively Self-Improving Organic Robots will Modify their Own Source Code and Bootstrap Our Way to Full-Spectrum Superintelligence. In A. H. Eden, J. H. Moor, J. Soraker & E. Steinhart (Eds.) Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment (pp. 199–238). Springer.

Pellegrino, E. D. (2006). Bioethics and Politics: “Doing Ethics” in the Public Square. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31(6), 569-584.

Peters, T. (2005). The soul of trans-humanism. Dialog. A Journal of Theology, 44(4), 381-395.

Ross, D. (2003). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.

Sandu, A. (2020). Bioethics of Public Policies. Ethical Standards in Crisis Situations. Postmodern Openings, 11(1Sup2), 141-160.

The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments (2007). Basilian Ltd. Publishing House.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.

Trujillo, A. L. (2003). Cloning: the disappearance of direct parenthood and denial of the family. Retrieved November 1, 2013 from

Vlad, L. (2017). The Family, Where to? From the "Solid" Perspective to "Liquid" Perspective. Postmodern Openings, 8(1), 67-80.




How to Cite

Кondratska L., Romanovska, L., Kravchyna, T., Korolova, N., & Oliynyk, K. . (2021). Bioethics as an Anthropological Challenge. Postmodern Openings, 12(3Sup1), 61-75.



Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now