Interaction with the Information Environment and Contemporary Educational Approaches in Higher Education (Educational Level “Master”)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.2/450Keywords:
information society, computer and communication technologies, post-industrial society, principles of training, magisters of technological education, philosophical approachesAbstract
A new look at the professional training of a higher school teacher, in particular, a teacher of general technical disciplines and teaching methods for technology, the disclosure of their creative potential is based on contemporary methodological approaches. Let’s consider in more detail each of the indicated approaches. The emergence of the information society is one of the signs of the transition of civilization into the noosphere. With the introduction of integrated communication networks, the possibilities of direct communication of individuals on a global scale are expanding. The introduction of computer and communication technologies into the daily life of people and into production makes a great socio-economic impact on the post-industrial society and causes such powerful social changes, it (society) turns into a completely new type – an information society, the structure and dynamics of which is based on the production of information, and not material values, as it was before. Information in such a society becomes a social and productive value. Hence the new features of society: a certain hierarchy of prestige, a specific type of education, information technology that provides a balance of dynamics and social statics, a fundamentally different manage-ment system, etc. Analysis of the introduction of degree training in higher pedagogical educational institutions of Ukraine allows us to identify general approaches in the implementation of master’s programs, in particular: their focus on the bachelor’s degree; variability, flexibility and mobility of master’s education, taking into account current socio-economic trends and regional needs; scientific and practical pedagogical direction and individual approaches in the organization of the educational process.
References
Abulkhanova-Slavska, K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Strategy of life]. Mysl.
Ananiev, B. G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as a subject of knowledge]. Publishing house of Leningrad University.
Arkhangelsky, S. I. (1980). Uchebnyy protsess v vysshey shkole, yego zakonomernyye osnovy i metody [The educational process in higher education, its logical foundations and methods]: study guide. Vysshaya shkola.
Atkinson, E. (2000). The promise of uncertainty: education, postmodernism and the politics of possibility. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210000200050
Babansky, Y. K. (1984). Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Pedagogy. https://www.klex.ru/hw9
Batechko, N. H. (2016). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady pidhotovky vykladachiv vyshchoyi shkoly v umovakh mahistratury [Theoretical-methodological principles of master’s degrees in education] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/14037/1/%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%20%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%BE.pdf
Bell, D. (2004). Gryadushcheye postindustrialnoye obshchestvo. Opyt sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya [The Coming Post-Industrial Society. Experience of social forecasting]. Academia. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/sociologija/bell_d_grjadushhee_postindustrialnoe_obshhestvo/25-1-0-2349
Bereka, V. E. (2008). Teoretyko-metodychni osnovy fakhovoyi pidhotovky mahistriv z menedzhmentu osvity [Theoretical and methodical bases of professional preparation of masters on management of education]. [Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Adult Pedagogical Education of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine]. Allbest.ru. https://otherreferats.allbest.ru/pedagogics/00590347_2.html
Bergson, A. (1914). Sobraniye sochineniy v 5 tomakh [The collection of works in 5 volumes]. M. I. Semenov. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1204167/
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1960). Principles and theory of growth. In W. W. Nоwinski (Ed.), Fundamental Aspects of Normal and Malignant Growth (pp.137-259). Elsevier.
Blair, K. L. (1997). Technology, teacher training, and postmodern literacies. The 48th Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Phoenix, Arizona (21 pages). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED413597.pdf
Bokova, T. N., & Malakhova, V. G. (2019). Postmodernism As The Dominant Of Education Development In The Information Society. In & S. K. Lo (Ed.), Education Environment for the Information Age, vol 69. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 173-180). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.09.02.21
Brzezinski, Z. (1970). Between Two Ages. Penguin Books.
Campbell, M. (2018). Postmodernism and educational research. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(07), 67. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.67006
Craft, A. (1997). Identity and creativity: educating teachers for postmodernism?. Teacher Development, 1(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664539700200001
Derkach, A. M., & Zazykin, V. (2003). Akmeologiya [Acmeology]: textbook. Piter. http://gpa.cfuv.ru/courses/os-ped-mast/Doc/Книги%20в%20формате%20(pdf)/Акмеология%20%20Под%20ред.%20Деркача%20А.А.pdf
Dodonov, B. I. (1978). Emotsiya kak tsennost [Emotion as value]. Politizdat. http://pedlib.ru/Books/6/0322/6_0322-1.shtml
Elkanov, S. B. (1986). Professionalnoye samovospitaniye uchitelya [Professional self-education of a teacher]. Prosveshcheniye.
Fourastier, J. (1949). Le grand espoir du XXe siècle [The Great Hope of the 20th Century]. Population.
Galbraith, J. (1969). Novoye industrial’noye obshchestvo [New Industrial Society]. Moscow. https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/5021
Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 345-361. http://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195
Gershunsky, B. S. (1998). Obrazovatelno-pedagogicheskaya prognostika [Educational and pedagogical prognostics]. Publishing House of Kyiv State University.
Grant, G. P. (1983). Philosophy and culture: Perspectives for the future. XVIIth World Congress of Philosophy, 1, 173-182. Montreal. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp171986125
Hurevych, R. S. (2002). Innovatsiyno-telekomunikatsiyni tekhnolohiyi v navchalno-mu protsesi i naukovykh doslidzhennjakh [Innovative telecommunication technologies in the educational process and research]. DOV Vinnytsia.
Karakovskiy, V. A., Novikova, L. I., & Selivanova, N. L. (1996). Vospitaniye? Vospitaniye... Vospitaniye! Teoriya i praktika shkol’nykh vospitatelnykh system [Education? Education ... Education! Theory and practice of school educational systems]. Novaya shkola.
Kobernyk, O. M. (2011). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady tekhnolohichnoyi ta profesiynoyi osvity [Theoretical and methodological principles of technological and professional education]. Scientific notes (Series “Pedagogy”), 3, 15-22. http://dspace.tnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/376/1/Kobernuk.pdf
Lebedeva, M. M. (2010). Tekhnologiya vedeniya peregovorov [Negotiation technology]. Aspect Press.
Lisovska, T. A. (2017). Psykholoho-pedahohichnyy analiz tvorchoyi spryamovanosti yak yakosti kreatyvnoyi osobystosti [Psychological and pedagogical analysis of creative orientation as a quality of creative personality]. Scientific bulleten of the Nikolaev National University named after V.O. Sukhomlinsky (Series: Pedagogical sciences), 2, 314-320. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvmdup_2017_2_58
Maksymchuk, B., Gurevych, R., Matviichuk, T., Surovov, O., Stepanchenko, N., Opushko, N., Sitovskyi, A., Kosynskyi, E., Bogdanyuk, A., Vakoliuk, A., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020a). Training Future Teachers to Organize School Sport. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/347
Maksymchuk, B., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Davydenko, H., Soichuk, R., Khurtenko, O., Groshovenko, O., Stepanchenko, N., Andriychuk, Y., Grygorenko, T., Duka, T., Pidlypniak, I., Gurevych, R., Kuzmenko, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020b). Developing Healthcare Competency in Future Teachers. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/307
Maslow, A. G. (1999). Novyye rubezhi chelovecheskoy prirody [New frontiers of human nature. Moscow. http://psyberia.ru/book/maslow01.pdf
Masuda, I. (1993). Kompyutopiya [Computopia]. Philosophical and sociological thought, 6, 36-50. https://www.slideshare.net/MalahMariya/ss-12638694
Matyash, N. V. (2000). Genezis i sushchnost ponyatiya “Proyektnaya deyatelnost shkolnikov” [Genesis and essence of the concept of “Project activities of schoolchildren”]. Sovershenstvovaniye tekhnologicheskogo obrazovaniya uchashchaysya molodyozhi [Improvement of technological education of students]: materials of the international scientific-practical conference “Technological education of rural schoolchildren in contemporary conditions” (pp. 146-154). Armavir State Pedagogical Institute. https://infourok.ru/matyash-n-v-psihologiya-proektnoy-deyatelnosti-shkolnikov-v-usloviyah-tehnologicheskogo-obrazovaniya-2969382.html
Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Golub, N., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Modely y orhanyzatsyone osobyne profesyonalne obuke vaspytacha u poјedynym zemљama Evropske Unyјe y u Ukraјyny [Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine]. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja [Journal of Institute for Educational Research], 51(1), 46–93. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1901046M
Misdi, M., Hartini, N., Farijanti, D., & Wirabhakti, A. (2013). Teacher-centred and teacher controlled learning: A postmodernism perspective. Journal of English Language and Learning, 1(1), 73-78. https://www.neliti.com/publications/61010/teacher-centred-and-teacher-controlled-learning-a-postmodernism-perspective
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308
Palamarchuk, O., Gurevych, R., Maksymchuk, B., Gerasymova, I., Fushtey, O., Logutina, N., Kalashnik, N., Kylivnyk, A., Haba, I., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Studying Innovation as the Factor in Professional Self-Development of Specialists in Physical Education and Sport. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/337
Pidkasisty, P. I. (1979). Sushchnost samostoyatelnoy raboty studentov i psikhologo-didakticheskiye osnovy yeye klassifikatsii [The essence of students’ independent work and psychological and didactic foundations of its classification]. In P. I. Pidkasisty, Problemy aktivizatsii samostoyatelnoy raboty studentov [Problems of activating students’ independent work] (pp. 23-34). Perm University Publishing House.
Podymova, L. A. (2012). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku innovatsiynykh protsesiv i natsionalnoyi innovatsiynoyi systemy v Ukrayini [Status and prospects of development of innovation processes and national innovation system in Ukraine]. Bulletin of Chernihiv State Technological University. Series: Economic Sciences, 4, 58-64. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vcndtue_2012_4_11
Rikowski, G., & McLaren, P. (2002). Postmodernism in educational theory. In D. Hill, P. McLaren, M. Cole, G. Rikowski (Eds.), Marxism against postmodernism in educational theory (pp. 3-13). Lexington Books. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316735694_Postmodernism_in_Educational_Theory
Rubinstein, S. L. (2002). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. (vol. 2). Pedagogy. http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/rubinshteyn=osnovu_obzhey_psc.pdf
Sheremet, M., Leniv, Z., Loboda, V., & Maksymchuk B. (2019). The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273-285. https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2561
Shmakov, S. A. (2003). Igry, razvivayushchiye psikhicheskiye kachestva lichnosti shkol’nika [Games that develop the mental qualities of the pupil’s personality]. CGL.
Shogan, V. V. (2016). Metodika prepodavaniya istorii v shkole [Methods of teaching history at school]. Phoenix.
Shotton, P. (2009). Transactional analysis training, postmodernism, and education. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39(4), 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215370903900404
Slastyonin, V. A., Isayev, I. F, Mishchenko, & A. I., Shiyanov, E. N. (2002). Pedaghoghika [Pedagogy]. Shkolnaya pressa.
Strelnikov, V. Y. (2006). Proektuvannya profesiyno-oriyentovanoyi dydaktychnoyi systemy pidhotovky bakalavriv ekonomiky [Designing of professionally-oriented didactic system of preparation of bachelors of economics]. RVC PUSKU.
Talyzina, N. F. (1988). Formirovaniye poznavatelnoy deyatelnosti mladshikh shkolnikov [Formation of cognitive activity of younger pupils]: a book for teachers. Prosveshcheniye. https://www.studmed.ru/view/talyzina-nf-formirovanie-poznavatelnoy-deyatelnosti-mladshih-shkolnikov_482223db4dd.html
Toffler, E., & Toffler H. (2008). Revolyutsionnoye bogatstvo: Kak ono budet sozdano i kak ono izmenit nashu zhizn [Revolutionary wealth: How it will be created and how it will change our lives]. ACT.
Touraine, A. (1998). Vozvrashcheniye cheloveka deystvuyushchego. Ocherk sotsiologii [Return of the Acting Man. Essay on Sociology]. Nauchnyy mir. https://socioline.ru/files/5/39/alain_touraine.pdf
Ursul, A. D. (1995). Problemy informatsii v sovremennoy nauke. Filosofskiye ocherki [Information problems in contemporary science. Philosophical essays]. Nauka.
Veblen, T. (1984). Teoriya prazdnogo klassa [Leisure Class Theory]. Moscow. http://www.library.fa.ru/files/veblen.pdf
Verbitsky, A. A. (2004). Kompetentnostnyy podkhod i teoriya kontekstnogo obucheniya [Competence-based approach and the theory of contextual learning]. Research Center for the Problems of the Quality of Training of Specialists. http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/npo/20120326010135.pdf
Voronina, T. P. (1995). Informatsionnoye obshchestvo: sushchnost, cherty, problemy [Information society: essence, features, problems]. Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute.
Wells, J. D. (1996). Postmodernism and information technology: Philosophical perspectives and pragmatic implications. In J. Carey (Ed.), Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 602-604). ArizonaState University. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=amcis1996
Wilkin, M. (1994). Initial training as a case of postmodern development: some implications for mentoring. In H. Hagger, M. D. Mcintyre (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school-based teacher education (pp. 37-53). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203724903
Wolfson, B. L. (2005). Obrazovaniye na postsovetstkom prostranstve: integratsiya i dezintegratsiya [Education in the post-Soviet space: integration and disintegration]. Pedagogy, 8, 3-15. https://portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1193919502&archive=1196814847&start_from=&ucat=&
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND