Reproduction, Use and Circulation of Natural Recreational Resources in the Context of Globalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/389Keywords:
Carpathian macroregion, market relations, social and economic tasks, organization of recreation, recreationally attractive natural resourcesAbstract
Transformations in the economy have led to significant changes in the recreational sphere of the macroregion. The introduction of market relations in the process of use, conservation, improvement and protection of natural recreational resources in the Carpathian macroregion has significantly exacerbated the solution of environmental, social and economic problems. Reproduction of natural resources in the recreational sphere requires the introduction of new theoretical and methodological principles. First of all, it concerns the qualitative distribution of resources suitable for the organization of recreation between the consumer spheres. This is the conceptual basis for establishing the limits of their use in order to prevent degradation and exhaustion. Exploring the ecological and economic principles of reproduction of natural recreational resources, two areas are identified: intra-industry, which characterizes the reproduction of studied resources within the recreational economy and intersectoral, which relates to the reproduction of attractive natural resources, which at the time of study are subject to economic activities. It is scientifically substantiated that the institutes functioning in the recreational sphere of the macroregion do not provide the proper solution of the set tasks. Institutional changes are needed, taking into account such prerequisites as: transition to a market model of management; intensification of the development of the recreational sphere in the conditions of insufficient experience; ecological situation in the macroregion; environment for the development of recreation in the context of globalization.
References
Abalkin, L. I. (1999). Ekonomicheskaya entsiklopediya [Economic Encyclopedia]. Economics.
Abas, A., Aiyub, K., Abdullah, N. A., & Anuar, N. N. М. (2018). Тhe cultural ecosystem services: From philosophical post-modernism perspectives. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 16(3/4), 45-50. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Azlan-Abas/publication/329235278_The_cultural_ecosystem_services_From_philosophical_post-modernism_perspectives/links/5c1792cf92851c39ebf346aa/The-cultural-ecosystem-services-From-philosophical-post-modernism-perspectives.pdf
Attwell, C., & Cotterill, F. (2000). Postmodernism and African conservation science. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008972612012
Boronos, V. H., Plikus, I. Y., & Kobushko, I. M. (2010). Upravlinnya finansovoyu sanatsiyeyu pidpryyemstv [Management of financial rehabilitation of enterprises]. Publishing House of the Sumy State University.
Cherevko, G. V., & Yatskiv, M. I. (1995). Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannya [Economics of nature]. Svit.
Davydovych, I. E. (2008). Kontrolinh [Controlling]. The Centre for Didactic Literature.
Donets, L. I. (2006). Osnovy pidpryyemnytstva. [Fundamentals of entrepreneurship]. The Centre for Didactic Literature. https://www.studmed.ru/donec-l-romanenko-ng-osnovi-pdpriyemnictva_b4bbd76.html
Fedorenko, V. G. (2004). Investoznavstvo. [Knowledge about investments]. Interregional Academy of Personnel Management.
Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 345-361. http://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195
Guan, J., Kirikkaleli, D., Bibi, A., & Zhang, W. (2020). Natural resources rents nexus with financial development in the presence of globalization: Is the “resource curse” exist or myth? Resources Policy, 66, 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101641
Khurramov, A., Abdulkhakimov, Z. T., Ibragimov, G., Mullabayev, B. B., & Nasrullaev, A. (2020). Use of gravity models in the development of recreation and balneology. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(6), 1390813920. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/3953
Krysachenko, V. S. (1996). Ekolohichna kultura: teoriya i praktyka [Ecological culture: theory and practice]. Zapovit.
Majeed, A., Wang, L., Zhang, X., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from GCC economies. Resources Policy, 73, 102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102204
Marshall, A. (1993). Printsipy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Principles of economic science]. Progress.
Maslyak, P. O. (2008). Rekreatsiyna heohrafiya [Recreational geography]. Znannya.
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2009). Pro zatverdzhennya Polozhennya pro rekreatsiynu diyalnist u mezhakh terytoriy ta obyektiv pryrodno-zapovidnoho fondu Ukrayiny [On approval of the Regulations on recreational activities within the territories and objects of the nature reserve fund of Ukraine]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0679-09?lang=en#Text
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Nudelman, M. S. (1987). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye problemy rekreatsionnogo prirodopolzovaniya [Social and economic problems of recreational nature management]. Naukova Dumka.
Palamarchuk, O., Gurevych, R., Maksymchuk, B., Gerasymova, I., Fushtey, O., Logutina, N., Kalashnik, N., Kylivnyk, A., Haba, I., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Studying Innovation as the Factor in Professional Self-Development of Specialists in Physical Education and Sport. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/337
Patiño, M. G., Medina, F. X., & Arilla, J. M. P. (2016). New trends in tourism? From globalization to postmodernism. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 2(3), 417-433. http://www.ijosmt.com/index.php/ijosmt/article/view/147/154
Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Pryntsypy pobudovy orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu formuvannya ta vykorystannya pryrodno-rekreatsiynoho potentsialu terytoriyi [Principles of building the organizational and economic mechanism of formation and use of natural and recreational potential of the territory]. Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya Ekonomika [Bulletin of Sumy State University. Economics Series], 1, 6066. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1866
Slavik, R. V., & Grynev, L. S. (2010). Metodolohichni aspekty formuvannya investytsiynoyi stratehiyi rozvytku rekreatsiynoho hospodarstva [Methodological aspects of formation of investment strategy of development of recreational economy]. Ekonomichni nauky, seriya “Ekonomika ta menedzhment”, 7(26), 146-156. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/916
Smith, A. (2018). Bahatstvo narodiv. Doslidzhennya pro pryrodu ta prychyny dobrobutu natsiy. [Wealth of Nations. Research on the nature and causes of the welfare of nations]. Nash Format.
United Nations. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/rio1992
Xie, Y. J., & Sun, J. J. (2017). Reflection and re-reflection in tourism study: a review on the modernism and postmodernism paradigm in Aramberri’s framework of criticism. Tourism Tribune, 32(2), 13-21.https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-LYXK201702008.htm
Yakovenko, E. G. (1991). Tsikly zhizni ekonomicheskikh protsessov, obyektov i system [Life cycles of economic processes, objects and systems]. Nauka.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
