The Gender Identity Effect in Hypothetical Transgressions: a Mixed Approach Exploring Undergraduates' Attitudes toward Transgender Individuals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/296Keywords:
transgender, moral judgement, age, gender, transgressionAbstract
The present study explored the relationship between attitudes toward transgender individuals and the judgments people make in transgression scenarios involving transgender and cisgender individuals of different ages in a sample of 184 Romanian students. We used a mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) and tested the effect of gender identity (cisgender or transgender) on participants' punishments in a hypothetical transgression (i.e., theft). In hypothetical transgressions involving preadolescent transgender and cisgender agents, results suggested no differences in participants' theft punishments. However, adult cisgender transgressors received significantly harsher punishments compared to transgender transgressors. Our qualitative analyses (N=736) suggested that the most frequent categories of responses justifying the punishments confirmed the importance of the agent's age. Our findings suggested no significant associations between participants' gender and reported the previous contact with an LGBTQ member and the punishments they chose for child and adult transgressors. Results are discussed in light of their implication in the contemporary, highly LGBTQ intolerant Romanian context.
References
Adela, M. (2010). Social perception of homosexuality in Romania. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 2(2), 5726-5730.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Barnett, M. A., & King, L. M. (1985). Undergraduates' punish-help judgments: The effect of transgressor's and victim's sex. Sex roles, 12(5-6), 579-586.
Barnett, M. D., Maciel, I. V., & Sligar, K. B. (2020). Moral Foundations, Sexual Prejudice, and Outness Among Sexual Minorities. Sexuality & Culture, 1-10.
Basow, S. A., & Johnson, K. (2000). Predictors of homophobia in female college students. Sex Roles, 42(5–6), 391–404.
Bastian, B., Laham, S. M., Wilson, S., Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 469-483.
Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378.
Cava, P. (2016). Cisgender and cissexual. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies, 1-4.
Cikara, M., Farnsworth, R. A., Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). On the wrong side of the trolley track: Neural correlates of relative social valuation. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 5(4), 404-413.
Costa, P. A., & Davies, M. (2012). Portuguese adolescents' attitudes toward sexual minorities: Transphobia, homophobia, and gender role beliefs. Journal of homosexuality, 59(10), 1424-1442.
Darley, J. M. (2009). Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens' desires to punish transgressions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 1-23.
Dima, R. (2020). Trends of Homophobic Activism in Romania, or 'How to Turn Religious Convictions into a Referendum and Still Fail'. In LGBTQ + Activism in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 185-208). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Fisher, A. D., Castellini, G., Ristori, J., Casale, H., Giovanardi, G., Carone, N., Fanni, E., Mosconi, M., Ciocca, G., Jannini, E. A., Ricca, V., Lingiardi, V., & Maggi, M. (2017). Who has the worst attitudes toward sexual minorities? Comparison of transphobia and homophobia levels in gender dysphoric individuals, the general population and health care providers. Journal of endocrinological investigation, 40(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0552-3
Flores, A. R. (2015). Attitudes toward transgender rights: Perceived knowledge and secondary interpersonal contact. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(3), 398-416.
Flores, A. R., Haider‐Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39(1), 197-216.
Fragale, A. R., Rosen, B., Xu, C., & Merideth, I. (2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 53-65.
Green, E.R., & Maurer, L.M. (2015). The teaching transgender toolkit: a facilitator's guide to increasing knowledge, decreasing prejudice & building skills. Ithaca NY: Planned parenthood of the southern finger lakes: Out for health. www.teachingtransgender.com
Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22.
Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond "homophobia": Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1(2), 6-24.
Horn, S. S. (2007). Adolescents' acceptance of same-sex peers based on sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of youth and adolescence, 36(3), 363-371.
ILGA (2021). Country Ranking. https://rainbow-europe.org/country-ranking#eu
Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(3), 321.
Kawai, N., Kubo, K., & Kubo‐Kawai, N. (2014). "Granny dumping": Acceptability of sacrificing the elderly in a simulated moral dilemma. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 254-262.
King, M. E., Winter, S., & Webster, B. (2009). Contact reduces transprejudice: A study on attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21(1), 17-34.
Krettenauer, T., & Eichler, D. (2006). Adolescents' self‐attributed moral emotions following a moral transgression: Relations with delinquency, confidence in moral judgment and age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 489-506.
Landen, M., & Innala, S. (2000). Attitudes toward transsexualism in a Swedish national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(4), 375–388.
Laurent, S. M., Clark, B. A., Walker, S., & Wiseman, K. D. (2014). Punishing hypocrisy: The roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors. Cognition & emotion, 28(1), 59-83.
Leitenberg, H., & Slavin, L. (1983). Comparison of attitudes toward transsexuality and homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12(4), 337-346.
Lelutiu-Weinberger, C., & Pachankis, J. E. (2017). Acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender-affirmative mental health practice training in a highly stigmatizing national context. LGBT health, 4(5), 360-370.
Li, M., Vietri, J., Galvani, A. P., & Chapman, G. B. (2010). How do people value life? Psychological Science, 21, 163–167.
Maftei, A., & Holman, A. C. (2020). Predictors of homophobia in a sample of Romanian young adults: age, gender, spirituality, attachment styles, and moral disengagement. Psychology & Sexuality, 1-12.
Maher, K. J., & Bailey, J. J. (1999). The effects of transgressor sex on judgments of unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 157-171.
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147-186.
Marin, R. (2018). Exploring Experiences of Transgender Identity Development in Romania. Analize–Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies, 10, 110-122.
Marsinun, R., Erwinda, L., & Syahputra, Y. (2020, March). Homosexual and Transgender Tendencies in Terms of Gender: A Rasch Perspective. The International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019) (358-361). Atlantis Press.
Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (1996). Playing it straight: masculinities, homophobias and schooling. Journal of Gender Studies, 5, 211–230.
Sirin, S. R., McCreary, D. R., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women's gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 12(2), 119-132.
Sweet, E. (2014). Toys are more divided by gender now than they were 50 years ago. The Atlantic, 9, 2014.
Walch, S. E., Ngamake, S. T., Francisco, J., Stitt, R. L., & Shingler, K. A. (2012). The attitudes toward transgendered individuals scale: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1283-1291.
White, C. J., & Schaller, M. (2018). Are children perceived to be morally exceptional? Different sets of psychological variables predict adults' moral judgments about adults and young children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(8), 1147-1162.
Worthen, M. G. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68(11-12), 703-723.
Worthen, M. G. (2016). Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 31-57.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND