A Bibliometric Mapping of the Research Trends of Public Governance and Entrepreneurship Framework

Authors

  • Oana Ramona LOBONT Professor PhD habil, West University of Timisoara, Finance Department, Timisoara, Romania
  • Raul PURCARITA Master Student West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Timisoara, Romania
  • Sorana VATAVU Postdoctoral researcher PhD, West University of Timisoara, Finance Department, Timisoara, Romania
  • Florin COSTEA PhD Student, West University of Timisoara, Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, Timisoara, Romania

Keywords:

public governance; entrepreneurship; bibliometric analysis; visualization

Abstract

The involvement of governments and public institutions in entrepreneurial activity has grown considerably in the last years. Public governance has begun to pay more attention to the fact that, in order to achieve the goal of economic development in a country, it is necessary to increase entrepreneurship both qualitatively and quantitatively. Most governments have created significant actions that encouraged and supported the entrepreneurial activity and also they have contributed to supporting the private sector in the economy. The present paper analyses the scientific works related to entrepreneurship and public governance, as well as to investigate the connection between these topics. The study presents a bibliometric analysis of the importance of the nexus public governance and entrepreneurship. The proposed research studies 201 references collected from the Clarivate Analytics, Web of Science Core Collection database. The research methodology performed to graphically map the literature is bibliometric analysis. The analysis is carried out on three distinct levels, namely the analysis of the co-occurrence of keywords, co-citation and co-author by means of (VOS) viewer program. This approach allows us to highlight the main results presented in journals, magazines, documents, subjects, authors, institutions but also results recorded at the country level. The study also evidence the main trends and impact of research in the form of a visual and schematic research framework on the relationship between public governance and entrepreneurship and its related elements, namely innovation and development.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2003). Root causes. A historical approach to assessing the role of institutions in economic development. Finance and Development, June, 26–30.

Acs, Z.J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? , Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press). Innovations Technology Governance Globalization, 1(1), 97-107.

Acs, Z.J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D.B., & O’Connor, A. (2007). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8

Aldrich, H.E., & Martinez M., Entrepreneurship as Social Construction: Multilevel Evolutionary Approach, Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Part of the International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship book series, 359-399, In: Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_15.

Alvord, S.H., Brown L.D., & Letts C.W. (2004). Social Entrepreneurship and Social Transformation: An Exploratory Study, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40 (3), 260-282.

Amorós, J. E., & Bosma, N. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2013 Global Report, Fifteen years of assessing entrepreneurship across the globe, available at https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=48772

Asian Development Outlook (2013). Governance and Public Service Delivery, Outlook 2013 update, Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines, available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/30418/ado2013-update_0.pdf.

Aspara, J., Lamberg, J.-A., Laukia, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2011). Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia. Management Decision, 49(4), 622-647.

Austin, J., Stevenson H., & Wei-Skillern J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Pratice Journal, da Baylor University, Estados Unidos, 30(1), 1-22.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, Resource Based View of Firm collection, Texas A&M University, 17(1), 99- 120.

Carayannis E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness, Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 10(1), 31-42.

Coe, D.T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859-887.

Dau, L.A. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 668-686.

Dima B., Lobonţ O-R., & Moldovan N-C. (2016). Does the Quality of Public Policies and Institutions Matter for Entrepreneurial Activity? Evidences from the European Union’s Member States. Panoeconomicus, 63(4), 425-439.

Engelbrecht, H-J. (1997). International R&D spillovers amongst OECD economies. Applied Economics Letters, 4(5), 315-319.

Frankfort, F., (1976) Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000–1700, (Cipolla, Carlo M.: New York: W. W. Norton & Co. 326 pp) History: Reviews of New Books, 4:9, 198-199, DOI: 10.1080/03612759.1976.9945516

Hoskisson, R., Hitt, M., Johnson, R., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697-716.

Jovanovic, B. (1992). Entrepreneurial choice when people differ in their management and labor skills: Università commerciale Luigi Bocconi.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Policy Research Working Paper Series, no. WPS 5430. World Bank.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M., (2006). Governance Matters V: Governance indicators for 1996-2005. Policy Research Working Paper Series, no WPS 4012. World Bank.

Khan, M.: (2007). Governance, economic growth and development since the 1960s”, DESA working paper, no. 54, 1-22.

Klapper, L., Amit, R., Guillén, M.F., & Quesada, J.M., (2007). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Research Working Paper. no. 4313. Washington D.C.: World Bank

Klein, P.G., Mahoney, J.T., McGahan, A.M. and Pitelis, C.N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1-15.

Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., & Pitelis, C.. (2013). Capabilities and Strategic Entrepreneurship in Public Organizations, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 70-91

Knoll, M., & Zloczysty, P. (2012). The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions Are Really Being Measured?. World Development, 40, 900-915.

Volkov, L. (1993). Business Organization and Myth of the Market Economy, by William Lazonick, Cambridge University Press, 1991, 372 pages. Syst. Res., 10: 87-89.

Lichtenberg, F.R. (1992). R&D investment and international productivity differences. NBER Working Papers, No 4161. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Liu, H.Y., & Hsu, C.W. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of corporate diversification: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Management Decision, 49(9), 1510-1534.

Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo W. (2020). Manual for VOSviewer version 1 .6.16, available at file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16.pdf

Ong, K.Y. (2006). Enabling Effective Governance in ASEAN Community. CAPAM 2006 Biennial Conference, Sydney, 23 October 2006. http://www.asean.org/resources/

Park, Y.R., Yul Lee, J., & Hong, S. (2011). Effects of international entry-order strategies on foreign subsidiary exit: The case of Korean chaebols. Management Decision, 49(9), 1471-1488.

Schunkert, H., König, I. R., Kathiresan, S., Reilly, M. P., Assimes, T. L., Holm, H., & Gieger, C. (2011). Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nature Genetics, 43(4), 333.

Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4)

Smolarski, J., & Kut, C. (2011). The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 39-55.

Thai, M.T.T. & Turkina, E., (2014). Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 29(4), 490-510.

United Nations (2013). Is Good Governance Good for Development? Bloomsbury Academic.

Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293-309.

Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335-350.

World Bank (2014). Doing Business. Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Comparing Business Regulations for Domestic Firms in 189 Economies. The World Bank, Washington DC.

Zahra, S., Gedajlovic, E., & Neubaum, D., & Shulman, J. (2009). A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Business Venturing. 24. 519-532.

Published

2021-04-29

How to Cite

LOBONT, O. R., PURCARITA, R., VATAVU, S., & COSTEA, F. (2021). A Bibliometric Mapping of the Research Trends of Public Governance and Entrepreneurship Framework. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1). Retrieved from https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/4100

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)