Integrated System of Enterprises' Innovative Development Management Under the Conditions of Post-Fordism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3Sup1/350Keywords:
postfordist transformations, innovation level, social development, information technologies, innovation management, innovative activitiesAbstract
Basic tendencies of enterprises' innovative development management have been considered from the perspective of postfordist tranformations. It has been determined that mobility is a specificity of postfordist industrial management. Mobility provides dispersion of structural subdivisions all over the world, it doesn't need any governmental support and strict control. Total diversification of the kind allows to implement «high» technologies through global data revolution practically into all spheres of social life. The evolution of social relations types from feudalism up to Post-Fordism has been provided and their specifics defined. Analytical studies carried out have enabled to discover formed world innovative centres and – from global economic perspective – those of half-peripheral countries with low level of innovative development. The directions of China management of innovative development, whose combined innovation level steadily increases, have been described. It has been determined that a great many of world countries is not currently being on the postfordist stage, since an industrial labour is characteristic for them which defines their type as traditional or early industrial pre-modern. We've also found that innovation development governance at the global level through the prism of postfordist transformations manifests itself in looking for niche, strict subordination to global market mechanisms, decentralization under control of transnational corporations; at the national level: in decentration of social space and thinking, marginalization of urban population, migration; at the meso level: in orientation on consumer needs, considerable mobility of production, individualization under global standardization; at the micro level: in project approach, faster time to market, cost minimization.
It has been determined that technological breakthrough evokes such social concerns as total control, alienation, job and security loss.
References
Alsulaimani, T. S., Almaz Momi, N. K., Arour, K. B. (2020). Emerging trends in management information systems: the use of new parallel distributed technologies. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(6), 160-165.
Byrne, D. S. (2020). Understanding class in the post-industrial era – thoughts on modes of investigation. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00039
Caruso, L. (2018). Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes? Al & Society, 33(3), 379-392. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0736-1
Chukurna, O., Niekrasova, L., Dobrianskа, N., Izmaylov, Y., Shkrabak, I., Ingram, K. (2020) Formation of methodical foundations for assessing the innovative development potential of an industrial enterprise. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 4, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/146
da Silva F. M., Oliveira E. A. A. Q., Moraes, M. B. (2016) Innovation development process in small and medium technology-based companies. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.04.005
Drobotya, Y., Baldzhy, M., Pecheniuk, A., Savelchuk, I., Hryhorenko, D., & Kulinich T. (2021). Overcoming poverty and social inequality in Third World countries (Latin America, Africa). IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(3), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.3.38
European innovation scoreboard 2020 – main report. Retrieved December 29, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42981
European innovation scoreboard. European Union open data Portal. Retrieved December 22, 2020 from https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/european-innovation-scoreboard-2019/resource/68f7952b-79af-4454-9d44-dcd11846451e
Fedirko, O. A. (2017). The paradigm of the local innovative development in EU economy [Thesis], Kyiv. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Fedirko_Oleksandr/Paradyhma_lokalnoho_innovatsiinoho_rozvytku_v_ekonomitsi_YeS.pdf?
Hirsch, D. (2011). Industrialization, mass consumption, post-industrial society. In H. W. Smith (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History (pp. 727-755). http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237395.013.0029
Hout, M., Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (1993). The Persistence of Classes in Post-Industrial Societies. International Sociology, 8(3), 259–277. http://doi.org/10.1177/026858093008003001
Kondrashov, P. (n.d.). The postfordist turn: global alternative or project for the chosen ones? Svobodnaya mysl [Free Thought]. Retrieved March 20, 2021 from http://svom.info/entry/637-postfordistskij-povorot-globalnaya-alternativa-ili/
Maiboroda, O., Bezuhla, L. S., Gukaliuk, A. F., Shymanska, V., Momont, T., & Ilchenko, T. V. (2021). Assessment of perspective development of transport and logistics systems at macro and micro level under the conditions of Industry 4.0 integration. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.3.32
Muljavka, V. (2016). New technologies and global inequality. Spilne [Commons]. Retrieved March 29, 2021 from https://commons.com.ua/uk/novi-tehnologiyi-i-globalna-nerivnist/
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Palamarchuk, O., Gurevych, R., Maksymchuk, B., Gerasymova, I., Fushtey, O., Logutina, N., Kalashnik, N., Kylivnyk, A., Haba, I., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Studying Innovation as the Factor in Professional Self-Development of Specialists in Physical Education and Sport. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/337
Pechenjuk, A. P. (2020). Information and innovative basics of rustical tourist development under the conditions of New Economy. Black Sea Economic Studies, 49, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.49-6
Pjatnytska, G. T. (2013). Organizationsʼ innovative development: integral parts and influencing factors. Marketing and Innovation management, 3, 76-91.
Polinkevych, O. (2015). Criteria for distinction the concept of «innovation», «innovation process» and «innovative development of enterprise» in the New Economy. Economic Journal of the Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 4(4), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2015-04-31-36
Powell J. L., & Khan H. A. T. (2014). Ageing in post-industrial society: trends and trajectories. Journal of Globalization Studies, 5(2), 143-151. https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/files/jogs/2014_2/143-151.pdf
Rumyantsev, A. (2015). Post-industrial technological mode of production: theory, economic and environmental features, discussion questions. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(Special Issue), 194-201. http://www.iresras.ru/uploads/Technological%20Mode%20of%20Production.pdf
Sevrjukov, K. (2021). From post-industrial capitalism to the new world. An engineerʼs essay about the desired future. Spilne [Commons].
Shen, Z., Siraj, A., Jiang, H., Zhu, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Chinese-style. Innovation and its international repercussions in the New Economic Times. Sustainability, 12(5), 1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051859
Vogt, K. C. (2015). The post-industrial society: from utopia to ideology. Work, Employment & Society, 30(2), 366-376. http://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015577911
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
