The Faces of Human Vulnerability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3/336Keywords:
vulnerability, suffering, subjectivity, socializing, Freud, Levinas, HabermasAbstract
The philosophic notion of human vulnerability cannot be pinpointed as such in the corpus of classic philosophy. Nevertheless, death and suffering as essential philosophical and theological problems make reference to the dimension of vulnerability inherent to the human condition. Since times immemorial, the fear of death, the avoidance of suffering, or the crisis situations of human existence have laid at the basis of philosophical and religious systems. According to Freud, in the futile pursuit of happiness humans often face misery, which stems from a suffering that threatens them from three different directions: their own body, the outside world, and the relationships with other people. Starting from this angle, the present article furthers the notion of vulnerability by identifying its archetypal themes in relation to human life and its conditions of existence. Two main concepts will guide this study of human vulnerability: a vulnerability inherent to human subjectivity, and one consubstantial to the process of human socialisation. For Levinas, vulnerability has become alike an obsession for others, a full responsibility, which leads to the following formula: it is only a vulnerable person who can love one’s neighbour. In accordance with Habermas, the manner in which a human being leaves natural law and accesses social justice is here re-examined, as it stands for a vulnerability structurally determined by the forms of socio-cultural life.
References
Apel, K.-O. (1994). Éthique de la discussion. Paris: Cerf.
Derrida, J. (1979). Violence et métaphysique. In L’écriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil.
Freud, S. (2010). Le malaise dans la culture. Paris: Flammarion.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). Profils philosophiques et politiques. Paris: Gallimard.
Habermas, J. (1992). De l’éthique de la discussion. Paris: Cerf.
Habermas, J. (2000). Conștiință morală și acțiune comunicativă [Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action]. București: Editura ALL EDUCATIONAL.
Kant, E. (1980). La religion dans les limites de la simple raison. Œuvres Complètes, Tome III. Paris: Gallimard.
Kant, E. (1990). Idée d’une histoire universelle au point de vue cosmopolitique. In Opuscule sur l’histoire. Paris: Garnier Flammarion.
Kant, E. (1997). Leçons d’éthique. Paris: Le livre de poche.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (2009), Jean-Jacques Rousseau fondateur des sciences de l’homme. In Anthropologie structurale II, Paris: Pocket Agora.
Lévinas, E. (1987). Autrement que savoir. Paris: Editions Osiris.
Lévinas, E. (1998a). Totalité et infini : essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Le livre de poche.
Lévinas, E. (1998b). Éthique comme philosophie première. Paris: Payot.
Lévinas, E. (2004a). Éthique et infini : Dialogues avec Philippe Nemo, Paris: Le livre de poche.
Lévinas, E. (2004b). De Dieu qui vient à l’idée. (2rd ed.). Paris: Vrin.
Lévinas, E. (2006). En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger (4rd ed.). Paris: Vrin.
Lévinas, E. (1986).L’Asymétrie du visage. In Cités. Emmanuel Lévinas, Une philosophie de l’évasion, n° 25, 2005, pp. 116-124.
Mill, J. S. (1994). Utilitarismul [Utilitarianism]. București: Editura Alternative.
Nussbaum, M. (1986), The fragility of goodness: luck and ethics in greek tragedy and philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paperman, P. (2005). Les Gens vulnérables n’ont rien d’exceptionnel. In P. Paperman & S. Laugier (Eds.), Le Souci des autres. Éthique et politique du Care, (321-337). Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
Spinoza, B. (1981). Etica [Ethics]. București: Editura Științifică și Enciclopedică.
Thomas, H. (2008). Vulnérabilité, fragilité, précarité, résilience, etc. De l’usage et de la traduction de notions éponges en sciences de l’homme et de la vie. In TERRA‐HN, Collections "Esquisses", recueil Alexandries n° 13. http://www.reseau-terra.eu/article697.html
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
