The Universe as an Aesthetic Symbolism of Postmodernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/423Keywords:
Universe, Cosmos, human, living matter, values, chaos, symbol, macrocosmAbstract
The article reveals the philosophical, worldview, aesthetically-axiological aspects of considering the universe as a symbolic phenomenon of the postmodern era. It is emphasized that the analysis of beauty, as the basic category of aesthetics, needs to find out its aggregate nature, depending on the individual and social semantic characteristics of reality. One of the key points of such an analysis is its metaphysical problematic – the direct emergence of constructive emotion into the realm of the transcendental, namely, the view of Man from the Universe from the standpoint of eternity. The timeliness and necessity of considering the problem of the symbolic context of the universe is obvious in the context of the third millennium, the realities of which call into question the very fact of conservation of wildlife on Earth. In the minds of assimilating the finality of the earthly boot, its primarity of progressive stochasticity, in the midst of the amplification of the eschatological context, the people of the era of postmodernity are demonstrating the development of the fastflowing, hardened nonsense. In the philosophical tradition, the symbol is the role of a pure "selfness", not tied to the powerful moment of the object: the symbolic picture does not reflect reality, as it is - the symbol of knowing the "refair" in the sphere of the virtual. It is proved that for the modern man the Universe is the object of not only scientific, technological, but also philosophical, cultural studies, it synthesizes for the unity of the object of scientific interest, a symbol of aesthetic pleasure and a source of formation of appropriate images and archetypes.
References
Apollinaire, G. (2014). Poetry. Folio.
Baudrillard, J. (2000). The transparency of evil. Dobrosvet.
Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). The Ethics Laws as a Basis for Building a Cosmic Civilization. The Sofia Republic. Philosophy and Cosmology, 24, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/13
Bazaluk, O. (2008). The matter of “world existence” from the point of view of the modern scientific and philosophical knowledge”. Philosophy and Cosmology, 7, 3-12. http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2008/2008-1-1.pdf
Bekh, V., Yaroshenko, A., Zhyzhko, T., Ignatyev, V., & Dodonov, R. (2020). Postmodern Picture of Reality of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution by Epistemological Diversity. Postmodern Openings, 11(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.3/208o/11.3/208
Berehova, H. (2020). Philosophy of Education: Cosmism in the System of Philosophical Knowledge. Filosofija. Sociologija, 31(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v31i1.4177
Berehova, H. (2017). The Philosophy of Unity and Development of Harmony as an Option of the Anthrocosmic World View. Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, 104-111. http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2017/Beregova_Philosophy_and_
Cosmology_vol_18.pdf
Bruno, G. (1936). About infinity, the universe and worlds. OGIZ.
Bugiulescu, M. (2017). Man and Cosmos from the Christian Theology perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3(6), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.26520/Icoana.2017.6.3.25-37
Hodge, M. (2019). Before and After Darwin: Origins, Species, Cosmogonies, and Ontologies. Routledge.
Kant, I. (1994). Criticism of judgment ability. Art.
Коstyuchkov, S. (2018). Different human images and anthropological colissions of post-modernism epoсh: biophilosophical interpretation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 13, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i13.131967
Onfray, M. (2016). Space. Materialistic ontology. Kuchkovo field.
Plato. (2007). Timaeus. Publishing House of St. Petersburg University.
Sagan, C. (2011). Cosmos. Random House Publishing Group.
Sagatovskiy, V. N. (1999). Philosophy of developing harmony: philosophical fundamentals of world outlook, part ІІІ: Anthropology. Petropolis.
Stasiulis, N. (2016). On the conception of the creative in natural science and philosophical reflections thereof. Creativity Studies, 9(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2015.111404
Vernadsky, V. (2004). Biosphere and noosphere. Iris Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND