Axiological Aspects of Educational Activity in Postmodern Philosophy
Keywords:Spiritual values, renewed system of education, philosophical bases, evolution of development of education, axiological directions
The relevance of the chosen topic of the article is determined by the need to improve the system of educational activities in postmodernism.
The article provides a theoretical analysis of developments on the topic, substantiates axiological (spiritual, moral, aesthetic and other values, their relationship with each other, with social, cultural factors and human personality; section philosophy) perspectives of educational activities in postmodern philosophy, gives a description of axiological areas of academic activity in postmodern philosophy; the main directions of the philosophy of education in the epoch of postmodernism are determined; the vision of a new paradigm of education in the works of researchers and scientists is presented.
The article analyses the understanding of the problems of education in the European philosophical and pedagogical tradition of the XX-XXI century, gives a brief overview of systematic works on the philosophy of education of prominent Western researchers of these problems, taking into account their proposed educational values. Based on the analysis, the article's author concludes that it is necessary to critically review several traditions for the philosophy of education and the choice of approaches in understanding the values of modern education.
The article's author notes the emergence of new axiological paradigms of education in the philosophy of education of the late XX - early XXI century, associated with the development of cultural-centric and global-historical trends in philosophy.
Andriushchenko, V. (2008). Rozdumy pro osvitu: statti, narysy, interviu [Reflections on education: Articles, essays, interviews]. Knowledge of Ukraine. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301228438_Filosofia_osviti_navcalnij_posibnik
Berube, M. (2004). Radical reformers: the influence of the left in American education. IAP. https://www.amazon.com/Radical-Reformers-Influence-American Education/dp/1593111363
Bilohur, V., Kravchenko, O., Lishchuk-Torchynska, T., & Yukhymenko, N. (2020). Generic and professional managerial skills: changing nature, thinking and roles. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 3, 151–156. http://nvngu.in.ua/jdownloads/pdf/2020/03/03_2020_Bilohur.pdf
Brameld, T. (1956). Toward a reconstructed philosophy of education. Dryden Press. http://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/nadams/educ692/Brameld.html
Durkheim, E. (1991). Cennostnye i «realnye» suzhdeniya [Value and “real” judgments]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2, 106–114. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/594/925/1216/15Dyurkgejm.pdf
Horban, O., Kravchenko, О., Martych, R., & Yukhymenko, N. (2019). The regulatory functions of education in behavioral models. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 3, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/23
Lauta, О. (2016). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok metodolohii ta filosofii osvity [Formation and development of methodology and philosophy of education]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia “Teoriia kultury i filosofiia nauky”, [Bulletin of Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science”], 53, 117–120. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/thcphs/article/view/5864
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240–255. https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/2625
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Opachko, M. (2016). Filosofiya suchasnoyi osvity`. Navchal`no-metody`chny`j posibny`k. Uzhhorod, Uzhhorod National University. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/21504/1/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81_%D0%A4%D0%9E.pdf
Ortega-i-Gasset, H. (1991). Chto takoe filosofiya? [What is philosophy?], Moskow, Nauka. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/o_filosofii/ortega_i_gasset_x_chto_takoe_filosofija/19-1-0-2672
Phillips, D. (2014). Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. Sage Publications. https://corp.credoreference.com/component/booktracker/edition/9331.html
Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo41188477.html
Proshkin, V. (2017). Pedagogichni texnologiyi v suchasny`x naukovy`x doslidzhennyax: dosvid ta innovaciyi [Pedagogical technologies in modern scientific research: experience and innovations]. Taras Shevchenko Lviv National University. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/22156/
Salnikova, S., & Lishchuk-Torchynska, T. (2016). Conceptual Framework the Study of Professional Socialization of Students. Zbiórartykułów naukowych. Konferencji Miedzynarodowej Naukowo Praktycznej “Priorytetowe obszary badawcze: od teorii do praktyki” (30.05.2016 – 31.05.2016). Warszawa, Wydawca “Diamondtrading tour”, 51–53. http://xn--e1aajfpcds8ay4h.com.ua/files/file/scientific_conference_53/53-6.pdf
Tereshchenko, Y. (2002). Filosofiya osvity` ta poshuky` moral`no-ety`chnogo vy`xovannya [Philosophy of education and the search for moral and ethical education]. Shlyah osvity` [The Path of Education], 3, 11–15. http://referat-ok.com.ua/work/teoretichne-obgruntuvannja-filosofsk/
Wolfson, B. (2003). Sravnitel'naya pedagogika. Istoriya i sovremennye problem [Comparative Pedagogy: History and Contemporary Issues]. University of the Russian Academy of Education. https://ua1lib.org/book/3137807/0b8888?id=3137807&secret=0b8888
Yukhymenko, N. (2019). Factors for the formation of the individual in the socio-cultural space: the meaning and purpose of life. Philosophical Horizons, 41, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-1443.2019.41.172997
Zakharov, I. (1989). Osvita yak obiekt sotsialnoho prohnozuvannia: Analitychnyi ohliad deiakykh zarubizhnykh kontseptsii [Education as an object of social forecasting: An analytical review of some foreign concepts]. Osvita i kultura: Istoriya ta suchasnist [Education and culture: History and modernity], 5, 80–101. https://posek.km.ua/biblioteka
Zinchenko, V. (1992). Obrazovanie, kul'tura, soznanie [Education, culture, consciousness]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya dlya XXI veka [Philosophy of education of the XXI century], 87–103. https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=t2fATkUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=t2fATkUAAAAJ:5ugPr518TE4C
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs