Renewing the Speech of Lawyers in the Postmodern Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/490Keywords:
System correlations of legal terms, prospective lawyers, professional training of prospective lawyers, specific linguistic competence of prospective lawyers, juridic lexicographyAbstract
The article considers the issue of legal discourse evolution in the context of today’s civilization informatization in the postmodern era and intercultural dialogue which determines the understanding of fundamental judicial notions relative to the consciousness of an individual as a subject of legal and economic operations, as well as an implementer of social-economic and cultural rights. Given that the Internet environment in the 21st century is characterized by hypertextual discourse, this raises the matter of differentiation between objective and axiological scientific knowledge contributing to a deeper understanding of the universe. The principles of further research in different scientific fields (humanitarian, natural, social, technical, physical and mathematical sciences) in the context of their social and socialization role in the information society are perceived as the coevolutionary basis of the informational civilization. Also noteworthy is the functional structural analysis of terms’ extraction from the symbolization of the language system, the prospective analysis of legal terms’ functioning, the study of their formal and semantic structure, the classification of legal sublanguage terms and the adjustment, unification and standardization of the term-based system.
References
Alberta Government (2015, September). Information and instructions for notaries public. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/1eb6c08c-b457-46d5-b3de-885c5ff78fe3/resource/a75f0be2-a9e4-49ca-bde5-bcebfed77941/download/notariespublicbooklet.pdf
Artykutsa, N. V. (2004). Mova prava i yurydychna terminolohiia [Language of law and legal terminology]. Stylos.
Banchuk, O. A., Kuybida, R. O., & Khavronyuk, M. I. (2013). Naukovo-praktychnyy komentar 2013 do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrayiny [Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Faktor.
Bihun, V. S. (2002). Pravova antropolohiia. Do pytannia pro doslidzhennia liudyny v pravi [Legal anthropology. On the question of the study of man in law]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava [Journal of Kyiv University of Law], 2, 15–20. http://www.nbuviap.gov.ua/images/justice/Ap/03.pdf
Bodio, J., Borkowski, G., & Demendecki, T. (2011). Ustrój organów ochrony prawnej [System of legal protection authorities]. Wolters Kluwer.
Brandes, M. P. (1988). Stil i perevod (na materiale nemetskogo yazyika) [Style and translation: on the materials of the German language]. Vyisshaya shkola.
Buhbinder, V. A., & Rozanov, E. D. (1975). O tselostnosti i structure teksta [On the structure of the text]. Voprosyi yazyikoznaniya [Issues of Linguistics], 6, 73–86. https://vja.ruslang.ru/archive/1975-6.pdf
Bylia, I. O. (2000). Do problemy terminolohii normatyvnykh pravovykh aktiv [To the problem of terminology of normative legal acts.]. Problemy zakonnosti [Problems of legality], 44, 3–7. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12885/Diss_Manko.pdf
Dashkovska, T. M. (2016). Spivvidnoshennia pravovykh norm i yurydychnoho protsesu u deiakykh pravovykh systemakh svitu [Correlation of legal norms and legal process in some legal systems of the world]. [Doctoral dissertation, Odessa law academy]. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12885/Diss_Manko.pdf
Davyidova, M. L. (2007). Teoreticheskie problemyi opredeleniya ponyatiya yuridicheskoy tehniki v otechestvennoy teorii prava [Theoretical problems of defining the concept of legal technique in the domestic theory of law]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Volgograd State University], 5(9), 23-32. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12502433
Demchenko, V. M. (2020). Kryminalne arho: funktsionalni koreliatyvni paraleli [Criminal slang: functional correlative parallels]. In V. V. Cherniei, S. D. Husariev, S. S. Cherniavskyi at al. (Eds.), Ukrainska mova v yurysprudentsii: stan, problemy, perspektyvy [Ukrainian language in jurisprudence: state, problems, prospects], 1, 68-72. https://cutt.ly/fOPmF3K
Diamond, L. (1992). Economic development and democracy reconsidered. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(4-5), 450499. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276429203500407
Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of comminity: rights and responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. Crown Publishers.
Fage, E. (2000). Liberalizm. O svobode. Antologiya mirovoy liberalnoy myisli (1 polovina XX veka) [Anthology of world liberal thought (the 1st half of the 20th century)]. Progress-Tradycyya.
Fergyuson, A. (2000). Opyit istorii grazhdanskogo obschestva [Experience of civil society history]. ROSSPEN.
George, C. R. (2017). Notaries (qualification) rules. http://www.facultyoffice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Notaries-Qualification-Rules-2017.pdf
Hochul, К. (2020). Notary Public License Law. Department of state division of licensing services. https://dos.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/08/notary.pdf
Honcharenko, V. H. (2010). Piznavalna funktsiia yurydychnoi kvalifikatsii [Cognitive function of legal qualification]. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy [Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine], 1, 106-108. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vaau_2010_1_19
Human Rights Commission (HRC). (2020). Notarial guide of good practices for people with disabilities: the notary as an institutional support and public authority. International Union of Notaries (UINL) https://www.uinl.org/documents/20181/339555/ANM_CGK-10-6-CDH+Guia-ENG/9c07925b-cae2-48cc-9806-a6e611a41b4e
Ivantsov, V. O. (2020). Special principles of certain procedures in the administrative-tort legislation. European Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 1, 10-13. http://ppublishing.org/upload/iblock/4c8/Law_1_2020.pdf
Kaplan, R. (Ed.). (1996). Freedom in the world. The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties: 1995-1996. Freedom House.
Klochko, M. I. (2009). Yurydychna terminolohiia: poniattia, osoblyvosti [Legal terminology: concepts, features]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia [State Building and Local Self-Government], 18, 148–154. Pravo. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2571/1/Klochko_148.pdf
Latyshev, L. K., & Semenov, A. L. (2008). Perevod: teoriya, praktika i metodika prepodavaniya [Translation: theory, practice and teaching methods]. Academia.
Merrill, D. W. (2020). Notary Public Manual. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SOTS/Business-Services/Notary/eLicense-Forms/Notary-Manual-June-2020.pdf
Mulgan, R. (2017). T. Vanhanen, the emergence of democracy, a comporative study of 119 states, 1850-1979, (Helsinki, Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, 1984). Political Science, 37(2), 184185. https://doi.org/10.1177/003231878503700214
Muller, E. (1995). Economic determinants of democracy. American Sociological Review, 60(6), 966982. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096435
Nersesyancz, V. S. (1997). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. NORMA.
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Oborotov, Yu. M., Zavalniuk, V. V., & Dudchenko, V. V. (2015). Kreatyvnist zahalnoteoretychnoi yurysprudentsii [Creativity of general theoretical jurisprudence]. Feniks.
Office of the Indiana Secretary of State – Business Services Division. (2021, April 19). Indiana Notary Public Guide. https://inbiz.in.gov/Assets/NotaryGuide.pdf
Oleszko, A., Pastuszko, R. (2014). Ustrój polskiego notariatu w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego [The system of the Polish notary’s office in light of the Constitutional Tribunal jurisdiction]. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 22, 551-561. https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22-s551-561/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22-s551-561.pdf
Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308
Sandel, M. (1992). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory, 12(1), 8196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/191382?seq=1
Schwab, S. (2019). Kansas notary public handbook. https://sos.ks.gov/forms/administration/NotaryHandbook.pdf
Scott, J. R. (2017). Legal translation – a multidimensional endeavor. Comparative Legilinguistics, 32, 37-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/cl.2017.32.2
Tatarinov, V. A. (2007). Metodologiya nauchnogo perevoda: k osnovaniyam teorii konvertatsii [Methodology of scientific translation: the basics of convertation’s theory]. Moskovskiy Litsey.
Zainudin, I. S., & Awal, N. M. (2012). Teaching translation techniques in a university setting: problems and solutions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 800804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.202
Zhalinskiy, A. E. (2009). Vvedenie v spetsialnost “Yurisprudentsiya”. Professionalnaya deyatelnost yurista [Introduction to the specialty “Jurisprudence”. Professional activity of a lawyer]. Prospekt Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
