Renewing the Speech of Lawyers in the Postmodern Society

Authors

  • Tetiana Mishenina Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Kryvyi Rih
  • Oksana Romanenko State University of Economics and Technology
  • Larysa Dzevytska Donetsk Law Instituteof of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
  • Tetіana Ternavska Private Higher Educational Institution «Kropyvnytskyi Institute of State and Municipal Governance»
  • Ivan Lytvyn Private Higher Educational Institution «Kropyvnytskyi Institute of State and Municipal Governance»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/490

Keywords:

System correlations of legal terms, prospective lawyers, professional training of prospective lawyers, specific linguistic competence of prospective lawyers, juridic lexicography

Abstract

The article considers the issue of legal discourse evolution in the context of today’s civilization informatization in the postmodern era and intercultural dialogue which determines the understanding of fundamental judicial notions relative to the consciousness of an individual as a subject of legal and economic operations, as well as an implementer of social-economic and cultural rights. Given that the Internet environment in the 21st century is characterized by hypertextual discourse, this raises the matter of differentiation between objective and axiological scientific knowledge contributing to a deeper understanding of the universe. The principles of further research in different scientific fields (humanitarian, natural, social, technical, physical and mathematical sciences) in the context of their social and socialization role in the information society are perceived as the coevolutionary basis of the informational civilization. Also noteworthy is the functional structural analysis of terms’ extraction from the symbolization of the language system, the prospective analysis of legal terms’ functioning, the study of their formal and semantic structure, the classification of legal sublanguage terms and the adjustment, unification and standardization of the term-based system.

References

Alberta Government (2015, September). Information and instructions for notaries public. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/1eb6c08c-b457-46d5-b3de-885c5ff78fe3/resource/a75f0be2-a9e4-49ca-bde5-bcebfed77941/download/notariespublicbooklet.pdf

Artykutsa, N. V. (2004). Mova prava i yurydychna terminolohiia [Language of law and legal terminology]. Stylos.

Banchuk, O. A., Kuybida, R. O., & Khavronyuk, M. I. (2013). Naukovo-praktychnyy komentar 2013 do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrayiny [Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Faktor.

Bihun, V. S. (2002). Pravova antropolohiia. Do pytannia pro doslidzhennia liudyny v pravi [Legal anthropology. On the question of the study of man in law]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava [Journal of Kyiv University of Law], 2, 15–20. http://www.nbuviap.gov.ua/images/justice/Ap/03.pdf

Bodio, J., Borkowski, G., & Demendecki, T. (2011). Ustrój organów ochrony prawnej [System of legal protection authorities]. Wolters Kluwer.

Brandes, M. P. (1988). Stil i perevod (na materiale nemetskogo yazyika) [Style and translation: on the materials of the German language]. Vyisshaya shkola.

Buhbinder, V. A., & Rozanov, E. D. (1975). O tselostnosti i structure teksta [On the structure of the text]. Voprosyi yazyikoznaniya [Issues of Linguistics], 6, 73–86. https://vja.ruslang.ru/archive/1975-6.pdf

Bylia, I. O. (2000). Do problemy terminolohii normatyvnykh pravovykh aktiv [To the problem of terminology of normative legal acts.]. Problemy zakonnosti [Problems of legality], 44, 3–7. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12885/Diss_Manko.pdf

Dashkovska, T. M. (2016). Spivvidnoshennia pravovykh norm i yurydychnoho protsesu u deiakykh pravovykh systemakh svitu [Correlation of legal norms and legal process in some legal systems of the world]. [Doctoral dissertation, Odessa law academy]. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12885/Diss_Manko.pdf

Davyidova, M. L. (2007). Teoreticheskie problemyi opredeleniya ponyatiya yuridicheskoy tehniki v otechestvennoy teorii prava [Theoretical problems of defining the concept of legal technique in the domestic theory of law]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Volgograd State University], 5(9), 23-32. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12502433

Demchenko, V. M. (2020). Kryminalne arho: funktsionalni koreliatyvni paraleli [Criminal slang: functional correlative parallels]. In V. V. Cherniei, S. D. Husariev, S. S. Cherniavskyi at al. (Eds.), Ukrainska mova v yurysprudentsii: stan, problemy, perspektyvy [Ukrainian language in jurisprudence: state, problems, prospects], 1, 68-72. https://cutt.ly/fOPmF3K

Diamond, L. (1992). Economic development and democracy reconsidered. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(4-5), 450499. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276429203500407

Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of comminity: rights and responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. Crown Publishers.

Fage, E. (2000). Liberalizm. O svobode. Antologiya mirovoy liberalnoy myisli (1 polovina XX veka) [Anthology of world liberal thought (the 1st half of the 20th century)]. Progress-Tradycyya.

Fergyuson, A. (2000). Opyit istorii grazhdanskogo obschestva [Experience of civil society history]. ROSSPEN.

George, C. R. (2017). Notaries (qualification) rules. http://www.facultyoffice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Notaries-Qualification-Rules-2017.pdf

Hochul, К. (2020). Notary Public License Law. Department of state division of licensing services. https://dos.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/08/notary.pdf

Honcharenko, V. H. (2010). Piznavalna funktsiia yurydychnoi kvalifikatsii [Cognitive function of legal qualification]. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy [Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine], 1, 106-108. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vaau_2010_1_19

Human Rights Commission (HRC). (2020). Notarial guide of good practices for people with disabilities: the notary as an institutional support and public authority. International Union of Notaries (UINL) https://www.uinl.org/documents/20181/339555/ANM_CGK-10-6-CDH+Guia-ENG/9c07925b-cae2-48cc-9806-a6e611a41b4e

Ivantsov, V. O. (2020). Special principles of certain procedures in the administrative-tort legislation. European Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 1, 10-13. http://ppublishing.org/upload/iblock/4c8/Law_1_2020.pdf

Kaplan, R. (Ed.). (1996). Freedom in the world. The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties: 1995-1996. Freedom House.

Klochko, M. I. (2009). Yurydychna terminolohiia: poniattia, osoblyvosti [Legal terminology: concepts, features]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia [State Building and Local Self-Government], 18, 148–154. Pravo. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2571/1/Klochko_148.pdf

Latyshev, L. K., & Semenov, A. L. (2008). Perevod: teoriya, praktika i metodika prepodavaniya [Translation: theory, practice and teaching methods]. Academia.

Merrill, D. W. (2020). Notary Public Manual. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SOTS/Business-Services/Notary/eLicense-Forms/Notary-Manual-June-2020.pdf

Mulgan, R. (2017). T. Vanhanen, the emergence of democracy, a comporative study of 119 states, 1850-1979, (Helsinki, Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, 1984). Political Science, 37(2), 184185. https://doi.org/10.1177/003231878503700214

Muller, E. (1995). Economic determinants of democracy. American Sociological Review, 60(6), 966982. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096435

Nersesyancz, V. S. (1997). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. NORMA.

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Oborotov, Yu. M., Zavalniuk, V. V., & Dudchenko, V. V. (2015). Kreatyvnist zahalnoteoretychnoi yurysprudentsii [Creativity of general theoretical jurisprudence]. Feniks.

Office of the Indiana Secretary of State – Business Services Division. (2021, April 19). Indiana Notary Public Guide. https://inbiz.in.gov/Assets/NotaryGuide.pdf

Oleszko, A., Pastuszko, R. (2014). Ustrój polskiego notariatu w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego [The system of the Polish notary’s office in light of the Constitutional Tribunal jurisdiction]. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 22, 551-561. https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22-s551-561/Studia_Iuridica_Lublinensia-r2014-t22-s551-561.pdf

Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308

Sandel, M. (1992). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory, 12(1), 8196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/191382?seq=1

Schwab, S. (2019). Kansas notary public handbook. https://sos.ks.gov/forms/administration/NotaryHandbook.pdf

Scott, J. R. (2017). Legal translation – a multidimensional endeavor. Comparative Legilinguistics, 32, 37-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/cl.2017.32.2

Tatarinov, V. A. (2007). Metodologiya nauchnogo perevoda: k osnovaniyam teorii konvertatsii [Methodology of scientific translation: the basics of convertation’s theory]. Moskovskiy Litsey.

Zainudin, I. S., & Awal, N. M. (2012). Teaching translation techniques in a university setting: problems and solutions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 800804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.202

Zhalinskiy, A. E. (2009). Vvedenie v spetsialnost “Yurisprudentsiya”. Professionalnaya deyatelnost yurista [Introduction to the specialty “Jurisprudence”. Professional activity of a lawyer]. Prospekt Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Mishenina, T., Romanenko, O., Dzevytska, L., Ternavska, T., & Lytvyn, I. (2022). Renewing the Speech of Lawyers in the Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 13(3), 284-309. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/490

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)


Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now