Philosophical and Pedagogical Discourse in the Postmodern Educational Space: Peculiarities of Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/517Keywords:
philosophical and pedagogical discourse, pedagogical discourse, higher education teacher, remote educational discourse, postmodern spaceAbstract
The article presents a philosophical understanding and real interpretation of the existence and evolution of pedagogical (educational) discourse in the postmodern space. The results of scientific research are analyzed and the structural-semantic relationship of the concepts, terms and categories associated with the terminological field “discourse” is defined. The authors raise the problem of the postmodern significance of discourse in the period of the global transformation of the educational environment, caused by the pandemic COVID-19, which has put humanity before the fact of actualization of remote communication and receipt of educational services. The authors believe that distance learning should be provided with strong technical and technological support on the one hand and the use of this vector set of educational, pedagogical, learning and development technologies in the preparation of future specialists in the system of higher education on the other. The article deals with new approaches to the application of discourse-supporting technologies and methods. Thus, the emphasis is placed on the relevance of an open informational and educational environment of higher education institutions in the postmodern space where the role of discourse as a constructive tool of postmodernism is determined by the new interpretation, and the teacher becomes a generator of innovations in this context.
References
Andrievskaya, V. V. (2018) Features of Pedagogical Discourse in the Information Society. Bulletin of psychology and pedagogy, 18. https://www.psyh.kiev.ua/Андрієвська_В._В._Особливості_педагогічного_дискурсу_в_умовах_інформаційного_суспільства
Andrushchenko, V., & Siladia, I. (2018). Poniattia pedahohichnoho dyskursu v suchasnykh doslidzhenniakh [The Concept of Pedagogical Discourse in Modern Research]. Higher education in Ukraine, 1, 5-10. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/32157/Andrushchenko1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Bekh, V., Yaroshenko, A., Zhyzhko, T., Ignatyev, V., & Dodonov, R. (2020). Postmodern Picture of Reality of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution by Epistemological Diversity. Postmodern Openings, 11(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.3/208
Bezuglaya, L. R, Bondarenko, E. V., Donets, P. M., et al. (2005). Dyskurs yak kohnityvno-komunikatyvnyi fenomen [Discourse as a Cognitive-Communicative Phenomenon]. Edited by Shevchenko I.S., translated from Ukrainian. Kharkiv: Constant.
Campbell, M. (2018). Postmodernism and Educational Research. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(7), 67-73.
Cherevychnyi, G. S. & Rostoka, M. L. (2020). The Image of an Ukrainian Lecturer at the Turn of the 20th – 21st Centuries: Experience Historical of the Beginning of the Transformation of the Educational System. World Science, 2(1(53), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/31012020/6902
Cuc, M. C. (2013). Ways to Streamline Didactic Communication. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 225-230. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.67006
Dijk, T. A. van. (1997). Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Sage.
Dijk, T. A. van (2013) Discourse and Power. Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication [per. from English]. https://www.lib.tsu.ru/mminfo/2014/000459486/000459486.pdf
Eco, U. (1972). Towards a Semiotic Inquiry into the Television Message. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 2, 103-121.
Fedorova, L. O., & Yanko, Yu. V. (2012). Filosofskyi dyskurs ta prahmatychni problemy yoho perekladu [Philosophical Discourse and Pragmatic Problems of its Translation.] Studia Philologica, 1. https://studiap.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/26
Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses. Une Archéologie des Sciences Humaines. Gallimard, Paris. [Фуко, М. (1994) Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. М., Прогресс, 1977 // Электронная публикация: Центр гуманитарных технологий, 20.06.2012]. https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/5169
Gabidullina, A. R. (2009). Educational and Pedagogical Discourse as a Linguistic Phenomenon. Linguistics, 6, 70-78. https://movoznavstvo.org.ua/index.php?option=com_attachments&task=download&id=398
Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London. New York: Routledge.
Gillett, G., & Harre, R. (2013). Discourse and Diseases of the Psyche. In K. W. M. Fulford (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Golovanov, B. D. (2011). Discourse as a Constructive Principle of the Postmodernism. Bulletin of VN Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science”, 2(958). https://periodicals.karazin.ua/thcphs/article/view/2082
Gumpertz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., et al. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. Rev Int Organ, 14, 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Haidamaka, O., Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Y., Storizhko, L. et al. (2022) Innovative Teaching Technologies in Postmodern Education: Foreign and Domestic Experience. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/419/
Jarvis, J., & Robinson, M. (1997). Analysing Educational Discourse: an Exploratory Study of Teacher Response and Support to Pupils’ Learning. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 212-228.
Karasik, V. I. (1999). Characteristics of Pedagogical Discourse. In Linguistic Personality: Aspects of Linguistics and Linguodidactics: Collection of Works (pp. 3-18). Volgograd, Change.
Karasik, V. I. (2000). On Types of Discourse. In Linguistic Personality: Institutional and Personal Discourse (pp. 5-20). Volgograd, Change.
Kemenov, P. A. (2009). Primenenie informacionnyh tekhnologij v VUZe [The use of Information Technology in the Learning Process at the University]. Human and Education, 3, 146-148. http://obrazovanie21.narod.ru/Files/2009-3_p146-148.pdf
Koltok, L. B. (2009). Pedahohichnyi dyskurs yak zasib intensyfikatsii navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu v suchasnii vyshchii shkoli [Pedagogical Discourse as a Means of Intensification of the Educational Process in Modern Higher Education]. PhD thesis. Kyiv.
Koltok, L. B. (2012). Pedahohichnyi dyskurs yak zasib intensyfikatsii navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu u vyshchii shkoli [The Pedagogical Discourse as a Means of Intensification Educational Process in Higher Educationin]. Тopical issues of the humanities: an intercollegiate collection of researchers working with young people with Drohobych workers at Ivan Franko University, 3, 181-188. http://www.aphn-journal.in.ua/eng/archive/3_2012/23.pdf
Kosmeda, T. (2010). Elltism of Pedagogical Discourse of a Higher Educational Establishment Lecturer. Visnyk Lviv Univ. Series Philol., 50, 98-104. http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/bulletins/index.php/philology/article/view/3791/3837
Kukhta, M. (2016). Pedagogical Discourse as a Means of Positive Motivation of Learning Activity. Current Issues of the Humanities, 16, 342-346. https://dspu.edu.ua/hsci/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/016-44.pdf
Lisoviy, V. S. (2007). Discourse. In I. M. Dzyuba, A. I. Zhukovsky, M. G. Zheleznyak, et al., (eds.), Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. Kyiv, Institute of Encyclopedic Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=24374
Litvinenko, N. P. (2010). Suchasnyi ukrainskyi medychnyi dyskurs [Modern Ukrainian Medical Discourse]. Abstract of Dr. Thesis. Kyiv.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1998). The State of the Postmodern. https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/3097/3098
Makarova, D. V. (2008). Movlennieva povedinka vchytelia v strukturi pedahohichnoho dyskursu [Speech Behavior of a Teacher in the Structure of Pedagogical Discourse]. Abstract of Dr. Thesis, Moscow. http://irbis.gnpbu.ru/Aref_2008/Makarova_D_V_2008.pdf
Malakhova, S. S., & Palastina, I. P. (2008). Conducting Classes on the Course “Management Decisions” Using Information and Communication Technologies. Innovation Based on Information and Communication Technologies, 1, 349-354.
Malakhova, V. G. & Bokova, T. N. (2020). Philosophical Ideas of Postmodernism and their Impact on the Education System in Russia and the USA. Education and Self Development, 15(1), 93-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/esd15.1.08
Marchenko, O. V. (2012). Metodolohichni stratehii doslidzhennia osvitnoho prostoru [Methodological Strategies for the Study of Educational Space]. Dnepropetrovsk, Innovation.
Melnik, T. V. (2013). Educational and Pedagogical Discourse as Typified Social and Cultural. Scientific Bulletin of Donbass, 2. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvd_2013_2_30
Mukhamed, T. V. (2015). Postmodernistskie modeli obrazovaniya [Postmodern Model of Education]. Journal of MGUKI, Theory and History of Culture, 4(66), 71-79.
Muzafarova, N. I. & Golovanov, V. I. (2005). Istoricheskaya rol' filosofsko-pedagogicheskoj mysli v formirovanii lichnosti grazhdanina [The Historical Role of Philosophical and Pedagogical Thought in the Formation of the Personality of a Citizen]. Moscow, Mosk. state un-t Engineer. Ecology.
Nadoleanu, G., Stăiculescu, A. R., & Bran, E. (2022). The Multifaceted Challenges of the Digital Transformation: Creating a Sustainable Society. Postmodern Openings, 13(1Sup1), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/428
Novokhatska, N. V. (2013). Antytsypovani y intertekstualni rozmovni konstruktsii yak znaky khudozhnoho movlennia [Anticipated and Intertextual Conversational Constructions as Signs of Speech]. Scientific Journal of the MP Drahomanov National Pedagogical University, 10, 184-188. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nchnpu_9_2013_10_32
Prokoshenkova, L. P., & Getskina, I. B. (2006). Diskursivnyj analiz i ego rol' v sovremennoj lingvistike [Discursive Analysis and its Role in Modern Linguistics]. Vestnik ChGU, 4. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diskursivnyy-analiz-i-ego-rol-v-sovremennoy-lingvistike
Robotova, A. S. (2008). Sovremennyj pedagogicheskij diskurs [Modern Pedagogical Discourse]. Bulletin of Herzen State Pedagogical University, 12, 19-25.
Robotova, A. S. (2018). Optimisticheskie smysly prepodavaniya v vysshej shkole [Optimistic Senses of Teaching at Higher School]. Higher Education in Russia, 2(220), 66-77. https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1275/1079.pdf
Rostoka, M. L., & Cherevychnyi, G. S. (2018). Transdisciplinary Paradigm of Stem-Knowledge Management in the Context of Adaptive Approach. World Science, 2/10(38), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/31102018/6180
Rostoka, M. & Rostoka, A. (2020). Fenomen “transdystsyplinarnist” u suchasnomu osvitnomu prostori. Rozbudova yedynoho vidkrytoho informatsiinoho prostoru osvity vprodovzh (Forum-SOIS, 2020). [The Phenomenon of “Transdisciplinary“ in the Modern Educational Space. Development of the Unified Open Information Space in Lifelong Education “Forum-SOIS, 2020”]. Publishing “Madrid“. (pp. 54-58)]. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/730346/2/ZbForumSOIS-2020redag.pdf
Rostoka, M., Guraliuk, A., Cherevychnyi, G. et al. (2021). Philosophy of a Transdisciplinary Approach in Designing an Open Information and Educational Environment of Institutions of Higher Education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 548-567. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/466
Savelchuk, I., Bybyk, D., Zhytynska, M., et al. (2021). Trends in the Development of Social Work: Postmodern Ideas and Prospects. Postmodern Openings, 12(3Sup1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3Sup1/356
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Siladia, I. (2017). Poniattia pedahohichnoho dyskursu v suchasnykh naukovykh doslidzhenniakh [Concept of Pedagogical Discourse in Modern Scientific Researches]. Gilea: Scientific Bulletin, 126, 384-388.
Sokolova, L. B. (2009). K probleme proektirovaniya pedagogicheskogo diskursa v vysshem professional'nom obrazovanii budushchego uchitelya [On the Problem of Designing Pedagogical Discourse in Higher Professional Education of the Future Teacher]. Proceedings of the SSC of the RAS, 11, 4(5), 1148-1154. http://www.ssc.smr.ru/media/journals/izvestia/2009/2009_4_1148_1154.pdf
Stanciu, R., & David, A.-E. (2022). Discursive Hypostatisations. Philosophic, Scientific, Literary, Artistic and Religious Discursivity. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/401
Stepanov, Yu. S. (1998). YAzyk i metod. K sovremennoj filosofii yazyka [Language and Method. Toward a Modern Philosophy of Language]. “Languages of Russian Culture”.
Stepanov, Yu. S. (2001). Semiotika: Antologiya [Semiotics: an Anthology]. Business Book.
Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2012). Critical Postmodern Theory in Mathematics Education Research: a praxis of uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 41-55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41485966
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis. The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. University of Chicago Press.
Suvorova, S. L. (2012). Fenomenologiya issledovaniya ponyatij «diskurs» i «pedagogicheskij diskurs» [Phenomenology of Researching the Notions “Discourse” And “Pedagogical Discourse’’]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Education. Pedagogical Sciences”, 4(263), 84-87.
Taratukhina, J. V. (2012). Osnovnye osobennosti diskursa na elektronnyh obrazovatel'nyh resursah raznyh kul'tur [Key Features of Discourse on Electronic Learning Resource From Different Cultures]. Open and Distance Education, 2(46), 72-76.
Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education. Routledge.
Volskaya, N. N., Borbotko, L. A., Zheltukhina, M. R., et al. (2017). Effective Suggestive Psychotechniques in the Political Media Discourse. Xlinguae, 10 (4), 84-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.04.08
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Yakovlev, A. I. (2001). Informacionno-kommunikacionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii [Information and Communication Technologies in Education]. Information Society. 02. Information Society Technologies – Internet and Modern Society 2000, 2. http://emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf/BPA/bce6d4452de1cad0c3256c4d005253d0
Yin, J. (2018). Beyond Postmodernism: Anon-Western Perspective on Identity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 13(3), 193-219. http://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2018.1497640
Zaporozhchenko, T., Matviienko, O., Chepelevska, M. et al. (2022). Implementation of Vocational Education Standards in the Context of Postmodern Trends. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/426
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
