Innovative Technologies in Physical Education: Adapting to a Postmodern Society


  • Dmytro Pohrebniak National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi
  • Tetiana Bolotnykova Pylyp Orlyk International Classical University
  • Volodimyr Farionov Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding
  • Liliya Tomich Kyiv National University of Technology and Design (KNUTD)
  • Nataliia Beseda Mariupol State University, Mariupol, Ukraine
  • Olha Anastasova Berdiansk State Pedagogical University



Value attitude, competence, worldview, health - saving education, post-industrial society


The article highlights innovative technologies in the context of physical education as one of the main factors of postmodern society. The main features of innovative technologies as an effective way to develop personal competencies and the formation of value orientations are defined in the context of the study.  Physical education contributes to the development of individual personality traits, as well as forming the health-saving foundations of the development of society in the perspective of evolution. Postmodern trends in the formation of society are defined by new worldview manifestations, when people lose meaning in certain value aspects and realize that past achievements can be neutralized. The physical education of a person forms the idea of the value of health, both in the past and in the future. It is this principle that defined the research problem.

It is determined that innovative technology is a sign of a postmodern society, because innovation is one of the characteristic features of the postmodern. Innovative technologies are most effective both in educational activities and in physical education. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the concept of postmodern society and innovative technologies were analyzed in the course of the study. Also identified the main aspects of physical education in the context of the modern dimension. The article explores the peculiarities of the use of innovative technologies in the aspect of physical education.

In the course of the study we used methods of analysis and synthesis, descriptive method and method of content analysis. This study provided the basis for determining the conceptual basis for the effectiveness of innovative technologies as postmodern approaches in the process of physical education.


Beck, C. (1993). Postmodernism, pedagogy and philosophy of education. Philosophy of Education, 27, 1-13.

Burbules, N. C. (2009). Postmodernism and education. In S. Harvey (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 1-10). Oxford University Press

Campbell, P. (1993). Pedagogical implications of postmodernism in adult literacy. Information Analyses, 2-24.

Frydenberg, E. (2002). Beyond Coping. Meeting goals, visions and challenges. Oxford University Press.$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:28297/ada/?ps=300&qu=Educational+psychology

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 264 p.

Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., & Lewis, F.M. (eds.). (2002). Health behavior and health education. Theory, research and practice. Wiley.

Gogunov, E. N., & Martianov, B. I. (2000). Psikhologiya fizicheskogo vospitaniya i sporta [Psychology of Physical Education and Sports]. Academia.

Gouzouasis, P., & Bakan, D. (2011). The future of music making and music education in a transformative digital world. The UNESCO Observatory e-journal, 2(2).

Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index-revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 543–574.

Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending. Processes of self-environment organization. Academic Press.

Hassan, I. (1987). Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. Ohio State University Press.

Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–421.

Hytten, K. (1994). Pragmatism, postmodernism and education. ERIC Clearinghouse.

Imel, S. (1998). Transformative learning in adulthood. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED42326).

Johnson, E. (1994). Yet Again: The Midland Dialect. American Speech, 69(4), 419-430.

Kalashnyk, L. S. (2013). Tendentsiyi rozvytku systemy pidhotovky pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv do vykhovnoyi roboty v zakladakh sotsialʹnoho pikluvannya pro ditey-syrit na suchasnomu etapi (dosvid KNR). [Tendencies of development of the system of training of pedagogical workers for educational work in the institutions of social care for orphans at the present stage (Chinese experience)]. Scientific Bulletin of the Kremenets Regional Humanitarian Pedagogical Institute named after Taras Shevchenko. Series: Pedagogy, 2, 176-181.

Kritsonis, W. A., & Jacobs, K. D. (2006). National strategies for implementing postmodern thinking for improving secondary education in public education in the United States of America. National Forum of Educational Administration and Suspervision Journal, 23(4), 1-10.

Lebedev, V. I. (1989). Lichnost' v ekstremal'nykh usloviyakh [Personality in extreme conditions]. Politizdat.

Maksymchuk I., Maksymchuk B., Frytsyuk V., Matviychuk T., Demchenko I., Babiy I., Tsymbal-Slatvinska S., Nikitenko A., Bilan V., Sitovskyy A., Savchuk, I. (2018). Rozvytok pedahohichnoyi maysternosti maybutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoyi kulʹtury u vyshchykh navchalʹnykh zakladakh [Development of pedagogical skills of future physical education teachers in higher education institutions]. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 18(2), 810-815

Melnyk N., Bidyuk N., Kalenskyy A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat N., Matviyenko O., Matviychuk T., Solovyov V., Holub N. & Maksymchuk I. (2019). Modelʹ i orhanizatsiyni kharakterystyky profesiynoyi pidhotovky vykhovateliv doshkilʹnykh navchalʹnykh zakladiv u deyakykh krayinakh Yevropeyskoho Soyuzu ta v Ukrayini [Model and characteristics of professional training of preschool teachers in some countries of the European Union and in Ukraine]. Proceedings of the Institute for Educational Research, 51(1), 46-93.

Paulhus, D.L., Fridhandler, B., & Hayes, S. (1997). Psychological defense: Contemporary theory and research. D.L. In S. Briggs, R.G. Hogan, J.W. Johnson, (eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 543–579). Boston: Academic Press.

Pinedo, І. (1996). Recreational Terror: Postmodern Elements of the Contemporary Horror Film. Journal of Film and Video, 48, 17–31.

Stolyarenko, A. M. (2002). Ekstremal'naya psikhopedagogika [Extreme psychopedagogy]. Unity.

Sushchenko, L. P. (2003). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady profesiynoyi pidhotovky maybutnikh fakhivtsiv fizychnoho vykhovannya ta sportu u vyshchykh navchalʹnykh zakladakh [Theoretical and methodological bases of professional training of future specialists in physical education and sports in higher educational institutions]: Ph.D. of Pedagogical Sciences thesis abstract: 13.00.04. Kiev.

Weiss, D.S., Marmar, C.R., & Metzler, T.J. (1995). Impact of Event Scale – IOES.




How to Cite

Pohrebniak, D., Bolotnykova, T., Farionov, V., Tomich, L., Beseda, N., & Anastasova, O. (2022). Innovative Technologies in Physical Education: Adapting to a Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 231-243.



Postmodern Education

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now