The Art of Healing, More than Science, More than Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/488Keywords:
art of healing; science; medical practiceAbstract
Traditionally, medicine has been considered a practical art. It seeks the patient’s well-being through technical means and specific skills in healing. On the other hand, healing means are connected to the life sciences, through which knowledge has developed systematically. Due to research and technological development, we can easily reveal the true meaning of medicine as science. Hippocratic practice and Aristotelian ethics have offered us a humanitarian approach, oriented to the sick person, which set the virtuous human character of each person who practices the virtues. The medicine people approached to the medicine preserving an ancient picture of the practice. They have know-how of the practice, recognize the characteristics of each field of art or science appreciating its utility and benefits, but often they don’t know why or where the boundary between the two fields, science and art, falls. They are scientists and artists, too. In this article I intend to fix what science means and what art means, based on Aristotelian arguments, which lead to a perspective of a virtuous professional life. Also, it is relevant to find its common issues. No physicians can successfully practice their profession without respecting the rigor of science and training their creativity. I plead for a moral practice, for the understanding of humanity's state in any medical act. Medicine is the moral community where practice meets science and arts merge both. Medicine is not between practice and science; it is the art itself of medical practice and science.
References
Aristotel. (1998). Etica nicomahică [Nicomachean Ethics]. Iri.
Aristotel. (2001, 2007). Metafizica [Metaphysics] (II ed.). Humanitas.
Aristotel. (2015). Opere: Despre suflet [Works: About the soul] (II ed.). Univers Enciclopedic Gold.
Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.
Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University press.
Aristotle. (2011). Nicomachean ethics. The University of Chicago Press.
Diogenes, L. (1963). Viețile și doctrinele filosofilor [The Philosophers' lives and doctrines] (Vol. IV). Academia RPR.
Downie, R. S. (1991). Medical ethics and literature. Journal of Medical Ethics: Literature and medicine, 98(17), 93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.17.2.93
Hughes, G. J. (2001). Aristotle on Ethics. Routledge.
McNally, J. R. (1971). Characteristics of Art in the Text of Aristotle. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29(4), 507–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/429196
Mureșan, V. (2007). Comentariu la Etica Nicomahica [Commentary on Nicomachean Ethics]. Humanitas.
Nobel, H. L. (2010). The Connection Between Art, Healing, and Public Health: A Review of Current Literature. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 254 - 263. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156497
Pellegrino, E. D. (2001). The Internal Morality of Clinical Medicine: A Paradigm for the Ethics of the Helping and Healing Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26(6), 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.26.6.559.2998
Pellegrino, E. D. (2002). Bioethics as an Interdisciplinary Enterprise: Where Does Ethics Fit in the Mosaic of Disciplines? În C. R. Ronald A. Carson, Philosophy of medicine and bioethics. A twenty-year retrospective and critical appraisal (Vol. 50, pg. 1-24). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pellegrino, E. D. (2006). Bioethics and Politics: “Doing Ethics” in the Public Square. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine,, 31(6), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310601088756
Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Prentice Hall International Inc.
Schatzberg, E. (2012). From Art to Applied Science. Isis, 103(3), 555–563. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667979
Scott, P. A. (2000, 07). The relationship between the arts and medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities, 26, 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.1.3
Solbakk, J. H. (2015). What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41, 12-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102310
Swanger, D. (1993). The Arts, Empathy, and Aristotle. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 27(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333340
Ward, L. R. (1968). Aristotle on Criteria of Moral Good. The Review of Politics, 30(4), 476–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
