The Art of Healing, More than Science, More than Practice

Authors

  • Adina Marinescu Centre for Research in Applied Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/488

Keywords:

art of healing; science; medical practice

Abstract

Traditionally, medicine has been considered a practical art. It seeks the patient’s well-being through technical means and specific skills in healing. On the other hand, healing means are connected to the life sciences, through which knowledge has developed systematically. Due to research and technological development, we can easily reveal the true meaning of medicine as science. Hippocratic practice and Aristotelian ethics have offered us a humanitarian approach, oriented to the sick person, which set the virtuous human character of each person who practices the virtues. The medicine people approached to the medicine preserving an ancient picture of the practice. They have know-how of the practice, recognize the characteristics of each field of art or science appreciating its utility and benefits, but often they don’t know why or where the boundary between the two fields, science and art, falls. They are scientists and artists, too. In this article I intend to fix what science means and what art means, based on Aristotelian arguments, which lead to a perspective of a virtuous professional life. Also, it is relevant to find its common issues. No physicians can successfully practice their profession without respecting the rigor of science and training their creativity. I plead for a moral practice, for the understanding of humanity's state in any medical act. Medicine is the moral community where practice meets science and arts merge both. Medicine is not between practice and science; it is the art itself of medical practice and science.

References

Aristotel. (1998). Etica nicomahică [Nicomachean Ethics]. Iri.

Aristotel. (2001, 2007). Metafizica [Metaphysics] (II ed.). Humanitas.

Aristotel. (2015). Opere: Despre suflet [Works: About the soul] (II ed.). Univers Enciclopedic Gold.

Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University press.

Aristotle. (2011). Nicomachean ethics. The University of Chicago Press.

Diogenes, L. (1963). Viețile și doctrinele filosofilor [The Philosophers' lives and doctrines] (Vol. IV). Academia RPR.

Downie, R. S. (1991). Medical ethics and literature. Journal of Medical Ethics: Literature and medicine, 98(17), 93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.17.2.93

Hughes, G. J. (2001). Aristotle on Ethics. Routledge.

McNally, J. R. (1971). Characteristics of Art in the Text of Aristotle. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29(4), 507–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/429196

Mureșan, V. (2007). Comentariu la Etica Nicomahica [Commentary on Nicomachean Ethics]. Humanitas.

Nobel, H. L. (2010). The Connection Between Art, Healing, and Public Health: A Review of Current Literature. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 254 - 263. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156497

Pellegrino, E. D. (2001). The Internal Morality of Clinical Medicine: A Paradigm for the Ethics of the Helping and Healing Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26(6), 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.26.6.559.2998

Pellegrino, E. D. (2002). Bioethics as an Interdisciplinary Enterprise: Where Does Ethics Fit in the Mosaic of Disciplines? În C. R. Ronald A. Carson, Philosophy of medicine and bioethics. A twenty-year retrospective and critical appraisal (Vol. 50, pg. 1-24). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Pellegrino, E. D. (2006). Bioethics and Politics: “Doing Ethics” in the Public Square. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine,, 31(6), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310601088756

Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Prentice Hall International Inc.

Schatzberg, E. (2012). From Art to Applied Science. Isis, 103(3), 555–563. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667979

Scott, P. A. (2000, 07). The relationship between the arts and medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities, 26, 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.1.3

Solbakk, J. H. (2015). What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41, 12-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102310

Swanger, D. (1993). The Arts, Empathy, and Aristotle. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 27(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333340

Ward, L. R. (1968). Aristotle on Criteria of Moral Good. The Review of Politics, 30(4), 476–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406110

Downloads

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Marinescu, A. (2022). The Art of Healing, More than Science, More than Practice. Postmodern Openings, 13(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/488

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now