Reactive Public Relations Strategies for Managing Fake News in the Online Environment

Authors

  • Gheorge Ilie FARTE "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Ias?i, Faculty of Philosophy and Socio-Political Sciences
  • Daniel Rares OBADA "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/16

Keywords:

Fake news, organization, 3D conceptual model, reactive PR strategies, communication management

Abstract

The aim of this conceptual paper is to discuss the issue of managing fake news in the online environment, from an organizational perspective, by using reactive PR strategies. First, we critically discuss the most important definitions of the umbrella term fake news in order to emphasize different challenges in conceptualizing this social phenomenon. Second, employing some valuable contribution from literature, we present and illustrate with vivid examples 10 categories of fake news. Each type of fake news is discussed in the context of organizational communication. We propose a 3D conceptual model of fake news, in an organizational context. Furthermore, we consider that PR managers can use either reactive PR strategies to counteract online fake news regarding an organization, or communication stratagems to temporarily transform the organization served into a potential source of fake news. Each reactive PR strategy can be a potential solution to respond to different types of online fake news. Although these possibilities seem to be extensive, in some cases, PR managers can find them ineffective. In our view, this cluster of reactive PR strategies is not a panacea for managing fake news in the online environment and different strategic approaches may be need, such as communication stratagems. We conclude that within online environment PR managers can employ a variety of reactive PR strategies to counteract fake news, or different communication stratagems to achieve organizational goals.

References

Allcott, H.A., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

Benoit, W.L. (1997). Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177-186.

Coombs, W.T. (1995). Choosing the right words: the development of guidelines for the selection of the „appropriate‟ crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447-476.

Fallis, D. (2014). The varieties of disinformation. In Floridi, L., & Illari, P. (Eds), The Philosophy of Information Quality (pp. 135-161). New York, Springer.

Figueira, Á., & Oliveira, L. (2017). The current state of fake news: challenges and opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 817-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.106

Fitzpatrick, K.R., & Palenchar, M. (2006). Disclosing special interests: Constitutional restrictions on front groups. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 203-224.

Gower, K.K. (2006). Truth and transparency. In K. Fitzpatrick, & C Bronstein (Eds.), Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy (pp. 89-106). Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.

Grunig, J., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kang, H., Keunmin, B., Shaoke Z., & Sundar, S.S. (2011). Source Cues in Online News: Is The Proximate Source More Powerful than Distal Sources? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 719-736. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403

Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2007). The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and The Public Should Expect (1st rev. ed.). New York: Three Rivers Press.

Lokot, T., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). News Bots: Automating News and Information Dissemination on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 4(6), 682-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1081822

McGonagle, T. (2017). „„Fake news‟‟: False fears or real concerns? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(4), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917738685

Palenchar M.J., & Fitzpatrick K. (2009). Public relations front groups: An ethical perspective on anonymous speech by partisan advocates. In Heath R.L., Toth E., & Waymer D. (Eds.) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II (pp. 272–289). New York: Routledge.

Rehm G. (2018) An Infrastructure for Empowering Internet Users to Handle Fake News and Other Online Media Phenomena. In: Rehm G., Declerck T. (eds) Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age. GSCL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10713 (pp. 216–231). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_19

Richards, P. (2016). How to Be a Spin Doctor: Handling the Media in the Digital Age. London: Biteback Publishing.

Robinson, S., & DeShano, C. (2011). Anyone Can Know‟: Citizen Journalism and The Interpretive Community of The Mainstream Press. Journalism 12(8), 963-982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911415973

Senger, H. (2005). The 36 Stratagems for Business: Achieve Your Objectives Through Hidden and Unconventional Strategies and Tactics. London: Cyan Communications.

Shoemaker, P.J., & Reese, S.D. (2013). Mediating the Message in The 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Smith, D.R. (2002). Strategic Planning for Public Relations. London: Taylor & Francis eLibrary.

Søe, S.O. (2018). Algorithmic detection of misinformation and disinformation: Gricean perspectives. Journal of Documentation. 74(2), 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2017-0075

Tandoc, E.C. Jr., Lim, Z.W. & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Thorson, E. (2008). Changing Patterns of News Consumption and Participation. Information, Communication and Society, 11(4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999027

Tuchman, G. (1978). Making News: A Study in The Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.

Wall, M. (2015). Citizen Journalism: A Retrospective On What We Know, An Agenda for What We Don‟t. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513

Wardle, C. (2017). “Fake News.” It‟s Complicated. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79

White, D.M. (1950). The „Gatekeeper‟. A Case Study in The Selection of News. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383-390.

Zimdars, M. (2016). “False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical „News‟ Sources.” Retrieved from: http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/ wp/2016/11/Resource-False-Misleading-Clickbait-y-and-Satirical%E2%80%9CNews%E2%80%9D- Sources-1.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-05

How to Cite

FARTE, G. I., & OBADA, D. R. (2018). Reactive Public Relations Strategies for Managing Fake News in the Online Environment. Postmodern Openings, 9(2), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/16

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): Postmodern Openings

Section

Theoretical articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND

CC_BY_NC_ND