What Practices for a Better Democratization of School Aids?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/106Keywords:
practices, democratization, conditions, help, actorsAbstract
A recent strong thesis questioned actors in the field (teachers, college principals, teaching assistants, students, senior education advisors) on the question of aid as a means of democratization of the school, success of more destitute. Four positions emerged with institutional, pedagogical and family recommendations. They all express practices whose aims are the fight against failure, school dropout and inequalities. The theoretical framework is part of the work of Bautier and Rochex, (1997), and Broccholichi (1995), Meirieu (2001). The methodology consists of thirty-nine semi-structured interviews and the treatment is a thematic analysis of content. The originality of the study is the reflection at better conditions for useful aids outside the classroom.
Thus, through a deductive approach, we have drawn some conditions for the help to be useful to students outside the classroom: to improve the diagnosis of school difficulty; target aid; put coherence in the actions; promote student volunteering with complementary modules based on a skills framework; reform the tasks. The success of aids also depends on changes to be made outside the classroom; reorganize the personalized help; focus on fundamental learning and diversify teaching methods: set up complementary modules with a reference system of skills; avoid the multiplication of aids; change the structure of the aid; integrate help into the teaching profession; train the actors of the helpers; change school rhythms, really involve families; evaluate the aid Strengthen the partnership between the aid and external actors.
References
Bardin, L. (2001). Content analysis. Paris, France: PUF (10th edition).
Bautier, E, & Rochex, J. Y. (1997). The experience of new high school students. Democratization or Massification? Paris, France: Armand Colin.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1964). The Heirs. Students and culture. Paris, France: Midnight.
Broccholichi, S. (1995). New orientations and segregations in secondary education. Contemporary society, 21, 15-27.
Kherroubi, M. (2004). Out-of-class educational activities. In J. F. Marcel (Coord.), Teaching practices outside the classroom (pp. 19-30). Paris, France: Harmattan.
Meirieu, P. (2013). Ten reversals needed to build a democratic school. Retrieved from: https://www.meirieu.com/MANIFESTESETPROPOSITIONS/dixrenversements.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND