The Dynamics of the Relationship between Humor and Benevolence as Values

Authors

  • Dana Rad Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-3585
  • Tiberiu Dughi Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences
  • Edgar Demeter Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences
  • Gavril Rad alumni Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/145

Keywords:

humour, benevolence, dynamic relationship, values theory

Abstract

This study provides significant information regarding the descriptions and definitions of values revised by Schwartz in 2012, where values can be displayed on a circular continuum of motivational dynamic relationships. One 46 items online questionnaire (assessing the perception of values) was administered to 220 participants from the West side of Romania. The 46 items instrument presented a strong internal consistency (an alpha coefficient of .839). This study provides information regarding the inter classes dynamic associations between benevolence as a self-transcendence value and humour as an openness to change value. Findings and conclusions are discussed.

Author Biographies

Dana Rad, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

Assoc. Prof. PhD

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Tiberiu Dughi, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Assoc.Prof. PhD

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Edgar Demeter, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Assist.Prof. PhD

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Gavril Rad, alumni Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

Psychologist MD

References

Balas Timar, D. (2014). Is it psychology about linear or dynamic systems? Journal SEA–Practical Application of Science, 2(04), 189-195.

Dughi, T., Bran, C., & Ignat, S. (2016).High school students values and decisions in future career. Journal Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 10(1), 46-60.

Iluţ, P. (2004). Valori, atitudini şi comportamente. Teme actuale de psihosociologie [Values, attitudes and behaviors. Current topics of psychosociology]. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.

Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

McGraw, A. P., Warren, C., Williams, L. E., & Leonard, B. (2012). Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1215-1223. doi:10.1177/0956797612443831

Merriam-Webster dictionary. (2019). Humor. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/humor on 10 April 2019.

Roccas S., & Sagiv, L. (2017). Values and behavior: Taking a cross-cultural perspective. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Ruch, W. (2010). The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

Sacară, L. (2006). Portrete axiologice individuale şi colective [Individual and collective axiological portraits]. Bacău, Romania: EduSoft.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (25th vol.) (pp. 1-65). New York, USA: Academic Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4560.1994.tb01196.x

Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169-203). London, UK: Sage.

Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Values: Cultural and individual. In F. J. R. Van de Vijver, A. Chasiotis & S. M. Breugelmans (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 463-493). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Rad, D., Dughi, T., Demeter, E., & Rad, G. (2019). The Dynamics of the Relationship between Humor and Benevolence as Values. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(3), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/145