Explenation of Paradigm Methodology of Specialists in Higher Education System Vocational Training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup1/235

Keywords:

paradigmatic methodology, vocational training, arts training, art specialties professionals, higher educational system, model.

Abstract

The article proofs the importance of the notion “paradigmatic methodology” use in scientific and pedagogical thesaurus, as well the expediency to define it as a science on the structure, principals, ideals, norms, methods and tools of the organization of strict and started specialists’ vocational training varieties. They usually aimed at the effectiveness increasing of higher educational system functioning in globalized information society. This definition is the basis for the conceptualization of the paradigmatic methodology of fine arts specialists training development and implementation of the model; its functioning in educatuinal process provides the effectiveness of students’ operative and volitional readiness for fine arts training during their lives. According to the criteria and indicators of activity of educational and creative actions and willpower to art education in the course of ascertaining and final experiments, the quantitative and qualitative affiliation of would-be artists to the levels of professional, basic and primary levels of the given readiness. The number of students belonging to its professional level of experimental group students, comparing with ascertained data, was stated to be three times increased and the primary – about two times reduced. The number of control group students of professional level has been more than twice increased, and of primary level – more than half as much less. On the correspondence with this model in higher educational system it is to design the vocational training of specialists of other qualifications to the purpose, but one need to take into account its specificity.

Author Biographies

Mykola Pichkur, Pavlо Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine

Ph.D. in pedagogical sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Fine Arts, Pavlо Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine

Mariia Oliiar, Vasyl Stefanyk National Precarpathian University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Vasyl Stefanyk National Precarpathian University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Iryna Rozman, Mukachevo State University

Associate Professor of the Department of English Philology and Teaching Methods of Foreign Languages

Oksana Petrenko, Rivne State University of the Humanities

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head at the Department of Theory and Methodology of Education, Rivne State University of the Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine

Irina Demchenko, Pavlо Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department Special Education, Pavlо Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine

Liliya Ryabovol, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the State-legal Disciplines and Administrative Law Department, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine

References

Arkhiyereyev, N. (2017). Logicheskiy pozitivizm i sovremennaya formal'naya filosofiya nauki [Logical positivism and modern formal philosophy of science]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 12(2),22–26. http://www.gramota.net/materials/3/2017/12-2/3.html.

Barkovskyi, V. Barkovska, N., Lopatin, О. (2006). Teoriia imovirnostei ta matematychna statystyka [Theory of probability and mathematical statistics]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury.

Bogachkov, Y. & Feldman, Y. (2015). Education paradigm for the informational society. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 49(5), 7–15. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v49i5.

Bykov, V., Spirin, О., Ramskyi, Y., Franchuk, V., Franchuk, N., & Yatsyshyn, А. (2017). The role of science school of academician M. І. Zhaldak in the informatization of secondary and higher pedagogical education of Ukraine. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia. 60(4), 1–16. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v60i4.

Cape Town's Declaration of Legal Educattion: ‘Opening the Future to Open Educational Resources” (2018). https://www.capetowndeclaration.org.

Chen, Y. H. (2018). Discussion From a Competence-Oriented Perspective on the Status Quo and Practice of the Secondary School Teacher Training "Arts Teaching Material and Methods" Curriculum. Journal Of Research In Education Sciences, 63(4), 89-117. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0004

Dakhin, А. (2002). Pedagogical modeling: essence, efficiency and ... uncertainty. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii, 4, 22–26.

Eco, U. (1994). Innovation et répétition: entre esthétique moderne et post-moderne. Réseaux. Communication-Technologie-Société, 12(68),9-26. http://enssibal.enssib.fr/autres-sites/reseaux-cnet/

Gerasymov, G. (2009). Paradigmalnyy plyuralizm kak proyavleniye krizisa obrazovaniya [Paradigm pluralism as a manifestation of the educational crisis]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 3-4, 7-21. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/paradigmalnyy-plyuralizm-kak-proyavlenie-krizisa-obrazovaniya.

Gleizer, S. S. (2020). An integrative view of the arts in the teaching of artistic and musical heritage (teacher training). Artseduca, 25, 131-138. doi: 10.6035/Artseduca.2020.25.9.

Gurevych, R. & Kademiya, М. (2016). Smart-osvita-nova paradyhma suchasnoi systemy osvity. [Smart education is a new paradigm of the modern education system]. Teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia sotsialnymy systemamy, (4),71-78.URL: http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/bitstream/KhPI-Press/26325/1/TIPUSS_2016_4_Gurevych_Smart.pdf.

Gurevych, R., Rogulska, O., Tarasova, O., & Magdiuk, O. (2019). A model of foreign language teachers training in the information-educational environment of higher educational institutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72(4),91–105. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v72i4.

Harvey, L., Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9-34. doi: 10.1080/0260293930180102.

Hordash, А. (2019). Generalizaciya art-paradygm v osvitnij metodologiyi stanovlennya osnov xudozhn`oyi majsternosti my`tcya [Generalization of art paradigms in the educational methodology of becoming the basics for the artist's artistic skill]. Problemy osvity, 91, 115-123.

Kadyjrova, L. H., Akhmetshina, E. G., Kadyjrov, T. R., & Peremislov, I. A. (2018). Principles of realization of the Polycultural Educational Model of the Republic of Tatarstan in the Fine Arts. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 6.

Karnap, R. (1959). Znacheniye i neobkhodimost. Issledovaniye po semantike i modalnoy logike [Value and necessity. Research on semantics and modal logics]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo instrannoy literatury.

Kornetov, G. (2003). General pedagogy [General Pedagogics]: uchebnoye posobiye. Moscow: Izd-vo URAO.

Korshunova, N. (2006). The concept of paradigm: in the labyrinths of search. Pedagogika, 8, 11–20.

Kubiv, S., Minich, O., & Biryukov, A. (2016). Tsyfrova adzhenda Ukrainy – 2020 [Digital Agenda of Ukraine – 2020]. URL: https://ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf.

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press.

Law of Ukraine ‘On Higher Education’ (2019). https://kodeksy.com.ua/pro_viwu_osvitu/download.htm.

Levin, I. (2016). Paradigmal'nyy analiz modeley arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennogo obrazovaniya: klassifikatsiya, perspektivy realizatsii [Paradigm analysis of architectural and artistic educational models: classification, implementation, prospects of realization]. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal, 4(117), 53–58.

Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965 (pp. 59-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171434.008

Pichkur, М. & Sotska, H. (2019). Artistic and pedagogical paradigm of mimesis in the training of would-be specialists in fine arts in open air. Visnyk natsionalnoi akademii kerivnukh kadriv kultury i mystetstva, 1, 384-389. doi: 10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.167039.

Potapenko, E., Porkuian, О. & Kats, М. (2011). Novaya paradigma obrazovaniya [New Education Paradigm]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4/4(52),14–21. URL: http://journals.uran.ua/index.php/1729-3774/article/view/1383.

Quilez, M. (2018). Female students in the teaching of fine arts and design in the spanish public education system 1940-2015. Eari-Educacion Artistica-Revista De Investigacion, (9), 174-191. doi: 10.7203/eari.9.12101

Recka, A. (2018). Interpretation of visual inputs as a tool for measuring the effectiveness of fine arts education with an emphasis on the disciplines of theory and art history. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(2), 204-209.

Starokozhko, О. (2017). Strategies of educational space polyparadigmality. Visnyk Luhanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Trasa Shevchenka. Pedahohichni nauky, 8(1),223–230. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/vlup_2017_8(1)__30.pdf.

Stratehiia rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva v Ukraini [Strategies of Informational Society Development in Ukraine]. (2013). http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/386-2013-р.

Sydorenko, Е. (2002). Metody matematicheskoy obrabotki v psikhologii [Methods of mathematical processing in psychology]. St. Petersburg: Rech.

Tagiltseva, N. G., & Ovsyannikova, O. A. (2018). Polyartistic approach in teacher training of subject matter "art". Yazyk i kultura - Language and culture, (43),282-294.doi: 10.17223/19996195/43/17.

Tervo, J. (2017). Always the new: Paradigms and the inherent futurity of art education historiography. Studies in Art Education, 58(1),69-79. doi: 10.1080/00393541.2016.1258528.

Tusheva, V. (2018). The cultural paradigm in the modernization of art education: conceptual ideas and methodological guidelines. Naukovi zapysky. Ser.: Pedahohychni nauky, 163, 39–43.

UNESCO (1998). World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century: vision and action URL: http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_eng.htm

Vaquero, C. & Maria Gomez del Aguila, L. (2018). Artistic education, social disregard and lack of expectations. Consequences of reproduction as a non-educational paradigm. Eari-education artistica-revista de investigacion, (9), 220-236. doi: 10.7203/eari.9.12051.

Vykhrusch, V. (2017). The Paradigmatic Approach and Models of Adult Learning in Modern Higher Education. Pedahohichnyi dyskurs, 22, 35–41. URL: http://peddyskurs.kgpa.km.ua/Files/22/8.pdf.

Yezhova, O. V., Pashkevich, K. L., & Manoilenko, N. V. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Foreign Models of Fashion Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(2), 88-101. doi:10.18662/rrem/48.

Zeier, E. (2019). Psikhologiya professional'nogo obrazovaniya [Psychology of Professional Education]. Moscow: Yurayt.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-23

How to Cite

Pichkur, M., Oliiar, M., Rozman, I., Petrenko, O., Demchenko, I., & Ryabovol, L. (2020). Explenation of Paradigm Methodology of Specialists in Higher Education System Vocational Training. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup1), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup1/235

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now