Professional Pedagogical Culture: Historical Culturological Aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/314

Keywords:

self-organization, professional pedagogical culture, comparatively historical analysis, cultural genesis, model of education

Abstract

The phenomenon of professional pedagogical culture is analyzed as social pedagogical thing, that integrates historical cultural experience into elaborated coordinate pedagogical activity. Methodology of research are based on dialectic connection of such methods: comparison historical, genetic, cultural historical, synergistic one – for ascertainment of professional pedagogical culture as an open system, that changes becomes available for multi-factor interaction of processes of breeding and self-breeding, education and self-education, justification of processes of teacher's development and self-development. Scholarly novelty is at the analysis of fact of professional pedagogical culture as syntheses of subjective and objective phenomenon, discovering of pedagogical values, technologies, forms and results of pedagogical creativity as specific form of expression of personality's common culture, that bases at determined scholarly approaches. At the article is justified expediency approaches to study of issues of professional and pedagogical culture. During the work was traced the evolution of culturological epochs and models of culturological education that are appropriate for them on a base of culturological approach. It is emphasized, that professional pedagogical culture as consciously purposeful activity is oriented for self-development to professional self-realization with deployment of a personality. Self-organization of a teacher promotes the formation and figuring-out the target of activity, its planning, building individual professional trajectory, self-correction, making reflection.

References

Beckherst, D. (1996). Philosophy of activity. Questions of philosophy, 5, 32–36.

Canale, M. (1983). From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. Language and Communication. London: Longman.

Díaz, B. A. (2005). Riesgos de lossistemas de evaluación y acreditación de la educación superior [Risks of the evaluation and accreditation systems of higher education]. Paper presented in Seminario Regional: Las nueva stendencias de la evaluación y acreditaciónen América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Comisión Nacional de Evaluación y Acreditación Universitaria, Instituto Internacional para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe. Retrieved from http://www.angeldiazbarriga.com/ponencias/riesgos_sistemas_acreditacio n.pdf

Fromm, Е. (1959). The creative attitude. Creativity and cultivation. New York. Harper & Row.

Gerchanivska, P. (2017). Analiz kul`tury` v parady`gmi teoriyi sy`stem. [Analysis of Сulture in the paradigm of system theory]. Herald of NAKKKiM. Sciences works. №.1. Kyiv: Millenium, 3–7. Retrieved from https://nakkkim.edu.ua/images/vidannya/Visnyk_NAKKKiM/Visnyk_1_2017.pdf

Glazkova, I. Ya. (2018). Podolannya bar'yeriv inshomovnoyi diyal`nosti. [Overcoming barriers of foreign language activity]. Internalization of higher education in Ukraine in conditions of polycultural world space: conditions, problems, prospects. 2nd International conference. Mariupol. Retrieved from http://mdu.in.ua/Nauch/Konf/2018/mizhnar_konf/materialy_konferentcii-2018.pdf.

Grineva, V., Zhernovnykova, O., & Kovalenko, O. (2018). European experiencein training prospective teachechers. Leader. Elite. Society. 1: 91–99. doi: 10.20998/2616-3241.2018.1.09.

Holubnycha, L., Kostikova, I., Maslova, N., Tanko, A., & Sikora, V. (2019). Modern Types of Historiographic Sources in Pedagogy. Revista Romaneas capentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(2), 326–340. doi:10.18662/rrem/133

Hutmacher, W. (1996). Keycompetences for Europe. Reportof the Symposium Berne, (Switzerland 27–30 March).

Jaroshhuk, L. G. (2019). Osnovi naukovih doslіdzhen'. [Scientific research basics]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Retrieved from http://dspace.bdpu.org:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/918/Yaroshchuk%20L.%20Osnovy%20naukovykh%20doslidzhen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Karpenko, O. M., Lukyanova, A. V., Bugai, V. V., & Shchedrova, I. A. (2019). Individualization of Learning: An Investigation on Educational Technologies. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(3), 81–90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2243

Khatuntseva, S. M. (2016). Formation of futureteachers’ readiness for self-improvement in the process of individualization of professional training. Inclusionin Russia, the Ukraine and Belarus Ulf Algermissen, Olga Graumann, David Wybra (Eds.). Hildesheim. Zürich1988. NewYork.

Laktionova, E. B. (2010). Obrazovatelnaya sreda kak uslovie razvitiya lichnosti ee sub'ektov. [The education alenvironmentas a condition for the development of the in dividual an ditssubjects], Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Herzen, 128. 40–54. Retrieved from https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/128/laktionova_128_40_54.pdf.

Luka, I. (2007). Development of Students’ Intercultural Competence at the Tertiary Level. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 97–111. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228862068_Develop

Downloads

Published

2020-10-05

How to Cite

GLAZKOVA, I., KHATUNTSEVA, S., & YAROSHCHUK, L. (2020). Professional Pedagogical Culture: Historical Culturological Aspect. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/314