Modern Pedagogical Practice of Natural Science Training of Future Psychologists in Higher Educational Institutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/315%20

Keywords:

training, education, institutions, students, pedagogy

Abstract

The educational process is a dynamic phenomenon that changes and develops under the influence of various factors of a social, economic, political, regulatory, material, technical and technological nature, which, in our opinion, determines the need for constant updating of its content in accordance with the requirements of the time. The impetus for the transformation of the content of the natural scientific training of future psychologists, taking into account current trends in the present and current state of development of the neurobiological sciences, was the conceptual basis of the study. Let us characterize the modern practice of natural-science training of future psychologists in higher educational institutions of Ukraine and the peculiarities of creating an integrative course "Fundamentals of modern neurobiology" as a factor that will contribute to the transformation of the content of natural-science training of future psychologists, taking into account current trends in the present and current state of development of neurobiological sciences. The study confirms the feasibility and necessity of transforming the content of modern science education of future psychologists, carried out in higher educational institutions, and factors identified by students-psychologists (the relevance of science education, the lack of the results of modern scientific research in the educational material, the lack of the necessary educational and methodical literature, outdated teaching methods, little free time) that prevent them from improving their quality.

References

Akhmedova, E. M. (2017). Coworking as a transdisciplinary form of organization of the educational process of a magistracy. International scientific journal "Science through the prism of time", 7(7), 104-105.

Belous, O.V., & Parkhomenko, O. (2015). Diagnostic tools for professional and pedagogical competencies of future geography teachers at the Pedagogical University. Scientific notes of KSPU. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 141(1), 100-103.

Bushchak, G. (2016). Video lecture in the educational process: psychological and pedagogical features of training. Innovative computer technology in higher education: materials of the VIII scientific and practical. Conf., 22-24 leaf. 2016 (pp. 178-184). Publishing House of the Scientific Society, Shevchenko.

Customs, A. Y. (2018). Psychological and pedagogical conditions for constructing a creative educational process in the lesson. Primary School, 6, 31-35.

Fursova, D. V. (2014). Academic success and the emotional intelligence of the future psychologist. Acmeology, S1-2, 229-230.

Garcia-Cepero, M. C. (2008). The enrichment triad model: nurturing creative-productivity among college students. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., 45, 295-302. URL: https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703290802176238

Genkal, S. (2016). Didactic opportunities of heuristic training in biology of students in specialized classes. Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies, 3, 300-307. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/pednauk_2016_3_39.pdf

Gritsay, N. (2017). Application of the project method in the teaching of biology teaching methods. Collection of scientific works of the Uman Pedagogical University named after Pavel Tychina, Part 2, P, 62-69.

Hall, J., & Lunt, I. (2005). Global mobility for psychologists: The role ofpsychology organizations in the United States, Canada, Europe, andother regions. American Psychologist, 60, 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.712

Jimerson, S. R., Oakland, T. D., & Farrell, P. T. (2007). Thehandbook of international school psychology. Sage.

Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins, F. L., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., Nelson, P. D., & Rallo, J. S. (2004). Conpetencies Conference: Futuredirections in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical psychology, 60, 699–712. https://doi.org/10.10002/jclp.20016

Kenkel, M. B. (2009). Competency-based educationfor professional psychology. American Psychological Association.

Komyshan, A. I. (2018). Pedagogical diagnosis of students' achievements in academic disciplines. Pedagogical education: theory and practice: Sat. sciences, 15, 49-57.

Krivoruchko, M. V. (2018). Features of practical and laboratory work in natural subjects. The journal "Biology", 15(387), 2-6.

McCutcheon, S. R. (2009). Competency benchmarks: Implications forinternship training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 34(4, Suppl), S50–S53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016966

Peterson, D. R. (2003). Unintended consequences: Ventures and misad-ventures in the education of professional psychologists. American Psy-chologist, 58, 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.10.791

Rodolfa, E., Bent, R., Eisman, E., Nelson, P., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A cube model for competency development: Implications forpsychology educators and regulators. Professional Psychology: Re-search and Practice, 36, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735–7028.36.4.347

Vember, V. P. (2019). Implementation of BYOD technology for molding assessment. Innovative technologies in education: a collection of materials of an international scientific and technical conference Vol. 9. Issue 2. (pp. 45-47). Ivano-Frankivsk.

Vera, E. M., & Speight, (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling psychology: Expanding our roles. The Counseling Psy-chologist, 31, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031003001

Voronenko, T. (2015). Project activities of students in teaching natural subjects. Biology and chemistry at home school, 4, 20-24. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/10747/

Worrell, F. C. (2007). Professional psychology, school psychology, and psychological science: Distinctiveness, deindividuation, or separa-tion? The School Psychologist, 61, 96–101.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-05

How to Cite

BILYK, V., SUSHCHENKO, L., SHEREMET, I., HANUSHCHYN, S., & BONDARENKO, H. (2020). Modern Pedagogical Practice of Natural Science Training of Future Psychologists in Higher Educational Institutions. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/315

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now