Modern Pedagogical Practice of Natural Science Training of Future Psychologists in Higher Educational Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/315%20Keywords:
training, education, institutions, students, pedagogyAbstract
The educational process is a dynamic phenomenon that changes and develops under the influence of various factors of a social, economic, political, regulatory, material, technical and technological nature, which, in our opinion, determines the need for constant updating of its content in accordance with the requirements of the time. The impetus for the transformation of the content of the natural scientific training of future psychologists, taking into account current trends in the present and current state of development of the neurobiological sciences, was the conceptual basis of the study. Let us characterize the modern practice of natural-science training of future psychologists in higher educational institutions of Ukraine and the peculiarities of creating an integrative course "Fundamentals of modern neurobiology" as a factor that will contribute to the transformation of the content of natural-science training of future psychologists, taking into account current trends in the present and current state of development of neurobiological sciences. The study confirms the feasibility and necessity of transforming the content of modern science education of future psychologists, carried out in higher educational institutions, and factors identified by students-psychologists (the relevance of science education, the lack of the results of modern scientific research in the educational material, the lack of the necessary educational and methodical literature, outdated teaching methods, little free time) that prevent them from improving their quality.
References
Akhmedova, E. M. (2017). Coworking as a transdisciplinary form of organization of the educational process of a magistracy. International scientific journal "Science through the prism of time", 7(7), 104-105.
Belous, O.V., & Parkhomenko, O. (2015). Diagnostic tools for professional and pedagogical competencies of future geography teachers at the Pedagogical University. Scientific notes of KSPU. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 141(1), 100-103.
Bushchak, G. (2016). Video lecture in the educational process: psychological and pedagogical features of training. Innovative computer technology in higher education: materials of the VIII scientific and practical. Conf., 22-24 leaf. 2016 (pp. 178-184). Publishing House of the Scientific Society, Shevchenko.
Customs, A. Y. (2018). Psychological and pedagogical conditions for constructing a creative educational process in the lesson. Primary School, 6, 31-35.
Fursova, D. V. (2014). Academic success and the emotional intelligence of the future psychologist. Acmeology, S1-2, 229-230.
Garcia-Cepero, M. C. (2008). The enrichment triad model: nurturing creative-productivity among college students. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., 45, 295-302. URL: https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703290802176238
Genkal, S. (2016). Didactic opportunities of heuristic training in biology of students in specialized classes. Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies, 3, 300-307. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/pednauk_2016_3_39.pdf
Gritsay, N. (2017). Application of the project method in the teaching of biology teaching methods. Collection of scientific works of the Uman Pedagogical University named after Pavel Tychina, Part 2, P, 62-69.
Hall, J., & Lunt, I. (2005). Global mobility for psychologists: The role ofpsychology organizations in the United States, Canada, Europe, andother regions. American Psychologist, 60, 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.712
Jimerson, S. R., Oakland, T. D., & Farrell, P. T. (2007). Thehandbook of international school psychology. Sage.
Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins, F. L., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., Nelson, P. D., & Rallo, J. S. (2004). Conpetencies Conference: Futuredirections in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical psychology, 60, 699–712. https://doi.org/10.10002/jclp.20016
Kenkel, M. B. (2009). Competency-based educationfor professional psychology. American Psychological Association.
Komyshan, A. I. (2018). Pedagogical diagnosis of students' achievements in academic disciplines. Pedagogical education: theory and practice: Sat. sciences, 15, 49-57.
Krivoruchko, M. V. (2018). Features of practical and laboratory work in natural subjects. The journal "Biology", 15(387), 2-6.
McCutcheon, S. R. (2009). Competency benchmarks: Implications forinternship training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 34(4, Suppl), S50–S53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016966
Peterson, D. R. (2003). Unintended consequences: Ventures and misad-ventures in the education of professional psychologists. American Psy-chologist, 58, 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.10.791
Rodolfa, E., Bent, R., Eisman, E., Nelson, P., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A cube model for competency development: Implications forpsychology educators and regulators. Professional Psychology: Re-search and Practice, 36, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735–7028.36.4.347
Vember, V. P. (2019). Implementation of BYOD technology for molding assessment. Innovative technologies in education: a collection of materials of an international scientific and technical conference Vol. 9. Issue 2. (pp. 45-47). Ivano-Frankivsk.
Vera, E. M., & Speight, (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling psychology: Expanding our roles. The Counseling Psy-chologist, 31, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031003001
Voronenko, T. (2015). Project activities of students in teaching natural subjects. Biology and chemistry at home school, 4, 20-24. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/10747/
Worrell, F. C. (2007). Professional psychology, school psychology, and psychological science: Distinctiveness, deindividuation, or separa-tion? The School Psychologist, 61, 96–101.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
