Pedagogical Indoctrination in Romania. Perceptions of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers

Authors

  • Roxana Ghiatau Alexandru Ioan cuza University, Iasi
  • Florin-Vasile Frumos Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Carol I Street, 11, 700506 Iași, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1Sup1/385

Keywords:

indoctrination, indoctrinative teaching and learning behaviour, teacher education

Abstract

Formal education means, among other things, to influence learner’s minds through ideologies and doctrines. The connection between ideology and teaching is often theorized through the concept of pedagogical indoctrination, but empirical data on this phenomenon are missing. Acknowledging the crucial importance of indoctrination in school, the major purpose of this study was to empirically explore teachers’ and future teachers’ perceptions about pedagogical indoctrination in Romanian education system. Starting from two theoretical models of school indoctrination, we elaborated a self-report questionnaire, describing three dimensions and 17 behaviours that reflect indoctrinative teaching situations. 260 subjects, 171 undergraduate pre-service teachers and 89 in-service teachers from the North-Eastern region of Romania participated in the study. The results indicate that both in-service teachers and pre-service teachers acknowledge the existence of indoctrination in schools, yet the phenomenon is not perceived as widespread. However, further statistical analyse reveal significant difference between pre-service and in-service teachers’ perception about behavioural and dimensional indoctrinative teaching and learning. The age, the faculty profile and the residence add significant information about subjects’ representation of indoctrinative teaching in Romanian school system. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.

Author Biography

Florin-Vasile Frumos, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Carol I Street, 11, 700506 Iași, Romania

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Carol I Street, 11, 700506 Iași, Romania

References

Alexandrescu, P. (2009). Starea actuală a educaţiei şi a învăţământului în România [ The current state of education in Romania]. Revista Romana de Sociologie, 20.

Apple, M. W. (2018). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge.

Bartolomé, L. I. (2008). Introduction. Beyond the Fog of Ideology. In L. I. Bartholomé (Ed.), Ideologies in education: Unmasking the trap of teacher neutrality (pp. I – XXX). Peter Lang.

Bocheński, J. M. (2006). Ce este autoritatea? Introducere în logica autorității [What is authority? Introduction to the logic of authority]. Humanitas.

Burbules, N. C., & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In T. S. Popkewitz, & L. Fendler (Eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics (pp. 45-65). Routledge. http://mediaeducation.org.mt/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Critical-Thinking-and-Critical-Pedagogy.pdf

Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Indoctrination. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved february 5, 2020, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/indoctrination

Colomeischi, A. A., & Colomeischi, T. (2015). The students ‘emotional life and their attitude toward mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 744-750.

Creţu, Daniela (2015). Identification of Leadership Styles in The Pre-University Educational System. Case Study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 535-543.

Cucoș, C. (1996). Pedagogie [Pedagogy]. Polirom.

Durkheim, E. (1980).Educație și sociologie [Education and sociology]. Editura Didactică și pedagogică.

Ficeac, B. (1996). Tehnici de manipulare [Manipulation techniques]. Nemira.

Hargreaves, A. (2001). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. A&C Black.

Harvey, C. W. (1997). Liberal indoctrination and the problem of community. Synthese, 111(1),115-130. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004949413665

Huttunen, R. (2003). Habermas and the problem of indoctrination. Encyclopaedia of Philosophy of Education. http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=habermas_and_the_problem_of_indoctrination

Kiss, A., Fejes, I., & Biró, Z. (2009). Some aspects and edifications of the PISA Assessments in Romania. Sísifo, 10, 65-72.

Larousse Edition. (2006). Indoctrination. In Le Petit Larousse (p. 375).

Macmillan, C. J. B. (1998). The inevitability of indoctrination. The Journal of Educational Foundations, 12(1), 7. https://search.proquest.com/openview/18553b052c343096153ebaca658c6db4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2031152.

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Indoctrination. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved february 5, 2020, from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/indoctrination

Momanu, M. (2005). Educatie si ideologie [Education and ideology]. Iași: Editura Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza.

Momanu, M. (2012). The pedagogical dimension of indoctrination: Criticism of indoctrination and the constructivism in education. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, 1(IV), 88-105. http://www.metajournal.org/

Reboul, O. (1977). L’endoctrinement. Presses Universitaires de France.

Sălăvăstru, C. (1994). Logicile nonstandard si interventiile educative. [Non-standard logics and educational interventions]. In P. Ioan (Ed.), Logică și educație [Logics and education] (pp. 63-120). Junimea.

Snook, I. A. (1972). Indoctrination and education. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

White, J. P. (1972). Indoctrination without doctrines? In I. A. Snook (Ed.) Concepts of Indoctrination (pp.190-210). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-16

How to Cite

Ghiatau, R., & Frumos, F.-V. . (2021). Pedagogical Indoctrination in Romania. Perceptions of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1Sup1), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1Sup1/385