Challenges of Curriculum Planning and Achieving Learning Outcomes: A Case Study of Croatian Elementary School Teachers’ Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1Sup1/386Keywords:
Learning outcomes, competence-based curriculum, pupil-centered learning, teachers’ professional development, qualitative case studyAbstract
This paper aims to explore the experiences of first, fifth, and seventh grade teachers (N = 23) in competence-oriented teaching from one elementary school included in the implementation of an experimental curriculum reform program in the Republic of Croatia. Based on the qualitative case study approach, the analysis of teacher evaluation protocols considered teachers’ opinions in the context of achieving learning outcomes with the use of teaching activities and methods. The paper also analyzes teachers’ opinions about the required changes in the planning and implementation of the teaching process as well as their professional development. For the learning success to increase, it is important for teachers to emphasize with their competences the organization of pupil-centered activities in achieving learning outcomes that change the approach to the planning of teaching. The focus of contemporary teaching should be on problem solving, active involvement of pupils in the teaching process while respecting the pupils’ interests, experiences, needs, motivations, prior knowledge, and expression of creative abilities. The teaching process focuses on constructivist teaching and the conceptual approach using collaborative methods and forms of work, technology in teaching, formative evaluation, and innovative approaches, whose intensity and complexity varies in different circumstances.
The results indicate that teachers recognize the potential of a contemporary competence-based approach and pupil-centered learning and teaching by achieving learning outcomes. Emphasis is placed on collaborative methods and forms of work, the introduction of digital technology and autonomy in the selection of content activities. They attach importance to the improvement of their professional activities in order to enable the pupils to acquire knowledge and develop skills by taking a modern approach to the teaching process and making them ready and able to respond to the demands of the future and modern society.
Keywords: Learning outcomes, competence-based curriculum, pupil-centered learning, teachers’ professional development, qualitative case study.
References
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development – a motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25, 576-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2018.1430685
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18 (1), 5-25.
Bezinović, P., Marušić, I., & Ristić Dedić, Z. (2012). Monitoring and improving school teaching. Zagreb: Agencija za odgoj i obrazovanje.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Čepić, R. (2020). Considering the educational needs, conditions, and opportunities in the context of teachers' professional development. EDULEARN20 Proceedings, 4068-4074.
Elton-Chalcraft, S., & Mills, K. (2015). Measuring challenge, fun and sterility on a ‘phunometre’ scale: evaluating creative teaching and learning with children and their pupil teachers in the primary school. Education, 43(5), 482-497.
Glazzard, J., Denby, N., & Price, J. (2016). Kako poučavati. Zagreb: Educa.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. MacArthur Foundation.
Kalin, J., & Čepić, R. (2019). Teachers’ professional development: Status and transversal competences. Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts, Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Rijeka.
Karajić, N., Ivanec, D., Geld, R., & Spajić-Vrkaš V. (2019). Projekt: Vrednovanje eksperimentalnoga programa Škola za život u školskoj godini 2018/2019. Zagreb: Ministarstvo znanosti i obrazovanje.
Koller-Trbović, N., & Žižak, A. (Eds.) (2008). Kvalitativni pristup u društvenim istraživanjima. Zagreb: Edukacijsko-rehabilitacijski fakultet.
Liessmann, K. P. (2008). Teorija neobrazovanosti:Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Matijević, M., & Rajić, V. (2015) Metodologije kurikulumskih promjena: nekad i danas. Konferencija UFZG2015, Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet, 635-654. https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/759141.matijevi_i_raji_4_simpozij_UFZG2015.pdf
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Mezak, J., & Pejić Papak, P. (2018). Learning Scenarios and Encouraging Algorithmic Thinking. In K. Skala (Ed.), MIPRO (pp. 836-841). Rijeka: IEEE.
Mezak, J., & Pejić Papak, P. (2019). Problem Based Learning for Primary School Junior Grade Pupils Using Digital Tools. In K. Skala (Ed.), MIPRO (pp. 805-810). Opatija: IEEE.
Moral-Pérez, M. E., Villalustre-Martínez, L., & Rosario Neira-Piñeiro, M. (2018). Teachers’ perception about the contribution of collaborative creation of digital storytelling to the communicative and digital competence in primary education schoolchildren. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(4), 342-365.
Pejić Papak, P., & Grubišić Krmpotić, H. (2016). Poučavanje primjenom suvremene tehnologije u obrazovanju. Život i škola, 62(3), 153-162.
Rajić, V. (2013). Mogućnosti unutarnje reforme primarnog obrazovanja implementacijom didaktičko-pedagoških rješenja reformskih pedagogija. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 10(1), 27-47.
Rogulj, E. (2014). Influence of the New Media on Children's Play. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 267-277.
Škola za život. (n.d.). Eksperimentalne škole. Škola za život. https://skolazazivot.hr/o-projektu/eksperimentalne-skole/
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Sage.
Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (January 2015). Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45(1), 128-136.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND