Trends and Perspectives in Didactic Evaluation in Higher Education


  • Liliana-Luminița Todorescu Department of Teaching Training, Politehnica University Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
  • Gabriel-Mugurel Dragomir Department of Teaching Training, Politehnica University Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
  • Anca Greculescu The Faculty of Engineering in Foreign Languages, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania



higher education, formative evaluation, summative evaluation, feedback


This article addresses trends and perspectives in didactic evaluation in technical higher education and in order to assist teachers in their continuous training through the results obtained. Thus, 263 students from Politehnnica University of Timisoara were interviewed. The research tool was a questionnaire with 25 items, of which 5 were factual. The issues addressed were related to an analysis of the state of affairs of the evaluation, as well as the proposals made by the interviewees to improve the evaluation. The suggested changes tackle a greater understanding and empathy on the teachers’ part, their objectivity, as well as a better correlation of the evaluation with the students’ psychological and personality traits. Regarding evaluation, particularly interesting was the suggestion of replacing teachers with senior students or even with computers. On the other hand, there is a reluctance of respondents to replace evaluators with intelligence devices or gadgets. The article can also be a starting point for future indepth research on the matter of evaluation.


Baykul, Y. (1992). Eğitim Sisteminde Değerlendirme [Evaluation in the Education System.]. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of the Faculty of Education], 7(7), 85-94.

Biggs, J. (2006). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education, 21(1), 5-16.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), May 1968.

Bontaş, I. (2001). Pedagogie. Tratat [Pedagogy. Treaty]. BIC ALL.

Brown, G. (2001). Assessment: A Guide for Lecturers. LTS Generic Centre.

Cucos, C. (2002). Pedagogie [Pedagogy] (2nd ed.). Polirom.

De Landsheere, G. (1975). Evaluarea continuă a elevilor și examenele: manual de docimologie [Continuous assessment of students and exams: handbook of docimology]. Didactică și Pedagogică.

Dragomir, G. M., Todorescu, L. L., Mazilescu, C. A., Popescu-Mitroi, M. M., Vrgovici, S. M., Grosseck, G. & Holotescu, C. (2013). Repere în evaluare [Landmarks in evaluation]. Editura de Vest.

Dragomir, G. M., Todorescu, L. L. & Greculescu, A. (2019). Teacher Dimensions in Technical Higher Education – A Student Perspective. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 11(2), 73-93.

Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289-300.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 1, 3-31.

Joița, E. (2006). Instruirea constructivistă - o alternativă. Fundamente. Strategii [Constructivist training - an alternative. Basically. Strategies]. Aramis.

Kirschner, P.A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How Learning Happens. Seminal Works in Educational Psychology and What They Mean in Practice. Routledge.

McCann, L., & Saunders, G. (2009). Exploring student perceptions of assessment feedback. Project SWAP Report. University of Southamptom.

McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Pearson New International Edition: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.

Nartgun, Z. (2009). Student Views on the Assessment Practices of Instructors during Instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 1807-1818.

Offerdahl, E.G. & Tomanek, D. (2011). Changes in instructors' assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 781-795.

Palmer, S. (2004). Authenticity in assessment: reflecting undergraduate study and professional practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 193-202.

Race, P. (2001). The Lecturer’s Toolkit. A Practical Guide to Learning. Teaching and Assessment (2nd ed). Kogan Page.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). “But is it fair?”: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.

Tan, Ş. (2012). Öğretimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in teaching] (7th Edition). Pegem Akademi.

Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education, 14(3), 281- 294.

Tyler, R. W., Gagne, R. M. & Scriven, M. (Eds.). (1968). Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, 1(5), 120-121. Rand McNally.

Weaver, M. (2006). Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.

Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2010). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49-65.




How to Cite

Todorescu, L.-L., Dragomir, G.-M., & Greculescu, A. . (2021). Trends and Perspectives in Didactic Evaluation in Higher Education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(4), 60-90.

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now