Comparison of Procedures Applied on the Auditive Feedback Equipment, Neuromuscular Electrostimulation and Kinesitherapy in Kyphotic Attitudes Recovery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1Sup1/552Keywords:
audio feedback, neuromuscular electrostimulation, kyphosis, kinesitherapy, vertebral spineAbstract
Problem statement: The general objective of our study has the investigation of the effectiveness of three different procedures used to improve kyphotic attitudes.
Purpose of the study: to analyse and compare which correction is the most important to address the deficiency. The following procedures are analysed: auditive feedback equipment, neuromuscular electrostimulation and kinesitherapy.
Methods: subjects were 20 young people aged 15-18 years who were diagnosed with this deficiency.
Research designs: these measurements were made in three different spatial times: initially, intermediate (after one month) and at the end (after two months).
Findings and results: the most effective procedure were kinesitherapy, followed by the neuromuscular electrostimulation procedure, and the last in this hierarchy being the auditive feedback equipment procedure. Within the three groups, higher values were obtained at the initial measurement, compared to the intermediate one and the final one. The results obtained were statistically processed using the SPSS software, more precisely we used the ANOVA method to make comparisons between the three experimental groups and the T test to compare the three measurement moments. Therefore, at the end of the study, following the comparison of procedures, the most effective procedure for correcting the kyphotic attitudes was established.
Conclusion Based on the results of this study we want to see if we can track the performance of other recovery methods through a software tracking.
References
Antonescu D., Obraşcu C., & Ovezea A. (1993). Corectarea coloanei vertebrale. Editura Medicală.
Ardelean, V., P. Hillerin, P., J, Andrei, V., L., Bitang V., & Dulceanu, C. (2018). Kinematic analysis of lower limbs movement in some karate techniques. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 67, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.03.7
Babault, N., Cometti, C., Maffiuletti, N. A., & Deley, G. (2011). Does electrical stimulation enhance post-exercise performance recovery? European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(10), 2501-2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2117-7
Britnell, S.J., Cole, J.V., Isherwood, L., Sran, M.M., Britnell, N., Burgi, S., Candido, G., & Watson, L. (2005). Postural health in women: the role of physiotherapy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 27(5), 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30535-7
Cuppone, A. V., Squeri, V., Semprini, M., Masia, L., & Konczak, J. (2016). Robot-Assisted Proprioceptive Training with Added Vibro-Tactile Feedback Enhances Somatosensory and Motor Performance. PloS one, 11(10), e0164511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164511
Cuppone, A.V., Cappagli, G., & Gori, M. (2018). Audio Feedback Associated with Body Movement Enhances Audio and Somatosensory Spatial Representation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 12(37). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2018.00037
Goh, S., Price, R.I., Leedman, P.J., & Singer, K.P. (2000). A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies. Rheumatology, 39(3), 310-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.310
Grimmer, K., Dansie, B., Milanese, S., Pirunsan, U., & Trott, P. (2002). Adolescent standing postural response to backpack loads: a randomised controlled experimental study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 3, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-3-10
Kamali, F., Shirazi, S., Ebrahimi, S., Mirshamsi, M., & Ghanbari, A. (2016). Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, 32(2), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2015.1110739
Maffiuletti, N.A., Minetto, M.A., Farina, D., & Bottinelli, R. (2011). Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: State-of-the art and unresolved issues. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111, 2391-2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1007/s00421-011-2133-7
Marcotte, L., Coillard, C., Dion, P., & Rivard, C. H. (2009). The treatment of Hyperkyphosis utilizing the SpineCor® Dynamic Corrective Brace: some preliminary results. Scoliosis, 4, O56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-S2-O56
Marcu, V., & Matei, C. (2009). Echilibrul corporal. Editura Universităţii din Oradea.
Niculescu, M., Mateescu, A., Creţu, M., & Trăilă, H., (2007). Bazele ştiinţifice şi aplicative ale pregătirii musculare. Editura Universitaria, Craiova.
Nijs, J., Roussel, N., Vermeulen, K., & Souvereyns, G. (2005). Scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain: a study examining the reliability and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(7), 1349-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.021
Perriman, D. M., Scarvell, J. M., Hughes, A. R., Ashman, B., Lueck, C. J., & Smith, P.N. (2010). Validation of the flexible electro goniometer for measuring thoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35(14), 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d13039
Petcu, S. (2001). Radiologie - imagistică medicală. Editura Medicală Universitară „Iuliu Haţieganu”.
Shamsi, M.B., Veisi, K., Karimi, L., Sarrafzadeh, J., & Najafi, F. (2014). Normal Range of Thoracic Kyphosis in Male School Children. Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
Talaghir, L.G., Rus, C.M., Iconomescu, T. M., Popovici, I. M. (2020). The Significance of Performance-Based Assessment for the Physical Education School Subject According to the Scoring System Used in the Romanian Educational System. Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială, 69, 388-409. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.69.26
Vaughn, D. W., & Brown, E. W. (2007). The influence of an in-home based therapeutic exercise program on thoracic kyphosis angles. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 20(4), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-2007-2040
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
