The Education System as an Open Information Paradigm of a Modern Technogenic Society
Keywords:publicity, education, technogenic society, totalitarian state, teaching culture, moral-communicative discourse
In this article, the author analyzes two systems of educational communication - post-Soviet and the most modern. At that, the most modern is defined as one that is fully dependent on the use of advanced public techniques and technologies, creating a so-called culture of public individualism of the educational space. It is proved that the modern public-educational space, striving for the conditions of technogenic singularity, acquires new open models of social-educational practices, which significantly change not only the criteria of social identification of the younger generation but also actualize the compromise between conformist multiplicity and identical integrity of higher education seeker. Public-educational interactions of technogenic society as a moral-communicative discourse in modern technogenic educational programs have a hidden manipulative nature, which is focused not on self-identification but collective interpersonal communication. In this communication, an important role is given to surrogate visual and public representations, which do not always carry the required educational load but only blur the information field, filling it with dual meanings. Intensive activities are being carried out in Ukraine to attract universal values and democratic ideals of Western society, but the public minority remains the key mechanism of social control over the majority. In this regard, the notion of communicative competence of a modern young person who studies and is always in a changing and information-saturated public-educational space acquires special significance.
Abrahim, S., Mir, B., Suhara, H., Mohamed, F., & Sato, M. (2019). Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis of social media use and education. Intermational Journal of Educayional Technology in Higher Education, 16(32). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0157-y
Adorno, T. (2001). Issledovanie avtoritarnoi lichnosti [Study of the Authoritarian Personality]. Serebrianye.
Andrushchenko, T. І. (2008). Duchovny tcіnnostі studentskoї molodі: sutnіst, struktura, prіoriteti. Gіleia: іstorіia. Polіtologіia. Fіlosofіia [Gіleia: History. Polytology. Philosophy] 11, 271–280. http://gileya.org/index.php?ng=library&cont=long&id=12
Atalli, J. (2011). A Brief History of the Future: A Brave and Controversial Look at the Twenty-First Century. Arcade Publishing.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). The Illusion of the End. Palo Alto. Stanford University Press.
Beck, U. (2015). What Is Globalization? Polity Press.
Beisad, Z-M., Marion, Z-L., & On-Van-Ku, K. S. (2021). Medytatsii Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen [Descartes' meditations in the mirror of modern interpretations] (2nd ed.). Dukh and Litera.
Merton, R., & Bell, D. (1999). Grjadushhee postindustrial'noe obshhestvo. Opyt social'nogo prognozirovanija [The upcoming post-industrial society. Experience of social forecasting].Academia.
Bell, D. (2004). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Academia.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2000). Informacionnaja jepoha: jekonomika, obshhestvo i kul'tura [Information age: economics, society and culture]. HSE.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). Konec istorii i poslednij chelovek [The end of the story and the last man]. ACT.
Gazniuk, L. (2003). Somatichne buttja personal'nogo svіtu osobistostі [Somatic Being of the Personal World of the Personality]. CDAFC.
Habermas, J. (2016). Strukturnaja transformacija publichnoj sfery [Structural transformation of the public sphere]. The whole world.
Hayek, F. (1952). The Counter-Revolution of Science on the Abuse of Reason. The Free Press.
Kant, I. (1964). Sochineniia [Compositions]. Mysl.
Khamitov, N. (2015). Filosofsʹka osvita ta nauka v Ukrayini: vidpovidi na novi vyklyky hlobalizatsiyi XXI stolittya [Philosophical education and science in Ukraine: responses to the new challenges of globalization of the 21st century]. In N. Khamitov, & S. Krulova (eds.), Yevropeysʹki pedahohichni studiyi [European pedagogical studies], Vol. 5-6 (pp. 95 – 111). Press.
Kochubei, N.V. (2009). Synergetic concepts and nonlinear contexts. Sumy.
Kopylov, V. (2009). Vlada і znannja: genezis іdeї epіstemokratії [Power and knowledge: the genesis of the ideological democracy]. KhAI.
Korablova, V. (2009). Pokolinnia v poli kultury: mnozhynnist reprezentatsii: monohrafiia [Generations in the field of culture: plurality of representation: a monograph.]. KhNU.
Kuhn, T. S. (1999). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lazarsfeld, P. (1999). Massovaja kommunikacija, massovye vkusy i organizovannoe social'noe dejstvie. Massovaja kommunikacija v sovremennom mire: metodologija analiza i praktika issledovanij [Mass communication, mass tastes and organized social action. Mass communication in the modern world: analysis methodology and research practice]. Editorial URSS.
Levinas, E. (2004). Izbrannoe. Trudnaia svoboda [Selected. Difficult freedom]. ROSSPEN.
Lippman, U. (2004). Publichnaia filosofiia [Public philosophy]. Ideia-Press.
Lipset, M. (2016). Politicheskii chelovek: sotcialnye osnovaniia politiki [Political man: the social foundations of politics]. Mysl.
Morozov, A. (2013). Intuitsiia u poshuku dobra: dukhovno-metafizychni aspekty [Intuition in search of good: spiritual and metaphysical aspects]. Lohos.
Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and Laws of Nature. The Free Press.
Svyashchuk, A. (2021). Obrazovanie kak otkrytaia Sistema [Education as an open system]. Presented at International scientific-practical conference «Sustainable Development Of Society: Conceptual And Practical Aspects» Ukraine, Rivne.
Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. McGraw-Hill.
Toffler, А. (2002). The Third Wave. AST.
Vasylieva, L. (2019). Liudyna publichna v kulturkomunikatyvnomu prostori suchasnosti [A person is public in the cultural and communicative space of modernity]. Machulin.
Vasylieva, L. (2021). Education of Moaerd Communication Strategies. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/427
Webster, F. (2014). Theories of the Information Society (International Library of Sociology). Routledge.
Yolles, M. (2020). The socio-cultural dynamics of development: part 1 development, growth and globalization. Kybernetes, 49(7), 1813-1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2019-0083
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs