Physical Culture as a Basic Component of the Integral Cultural Act

Authors

  • Veaceslav Manolachi Dr.habil., university professor, State University of Physical Education and Sport, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
  • Nicolai Vizitei Dr.habil., university professor, State University of Physical Education and Sport, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
  • Victor Manolachi Dr.habil., university professor, State University of Physical Education and Sport, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.3/622

Keywords:

Physical culture, knowledge, science, integral cultural act

Abstract

The problem on the essence of the "physical culture" phenomenon is central in the sciences of physical education and sports. In recent decades, it has been given special attention, an eloquent proof being the fact that in the curricula a new discipline of study has been widely implemented: "Theory and methodology of physical culture". At the same time, there are conceptual difficulties: "physical" and "cultural" are already revealed in the initial treatment of the "physical culture" notion. It should be noted that the situation as a whole is, at the same time, paradoxical, because, in the sphere of philosophical-cultural knowledge, there is a lasting tradition of considering the physical as a basic, immanent component of physical culture itself. Practically the analysis of culture leads, always to the confrontation of the social with the material, sharpening the question regarding their real correlation, fact that arises in the broad context of the fundamental problem discussion.

References

Fejerbah L. (1955). Osnovnye polozhenija filosofii budushhego [Basic provisions of the philosophy of the future]. In L. Fejerbah (ed.), Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedenija [Selected philosophical works], Vol. 1 (pp. 101-365). Politizdat.

Gadamer H-G. (1988). Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki [Truth and method. Fundamentals of philosophical hermeneutics] Progress.

Heidegger M. (1991). Otreshjonnost'. Gelassenheit [Secondment. Gelassenheit]. Vysshaya Shkola.

Heidegger, M. (1988). Pis'mo o gumanizme. V: Problema cheloveka v zapadnoj filosofii [Letter on humanism. In M. Hajdegger (ed.), The human problem in Western philosophy] (pp. 314-357.). Progress.

Hejzinga J. (1992). Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnja [Homo ludens. In the shadow of tomorrow]. Progress.

Jaspers K. (1994). Nicshe i hristianstvo [Nietzsche and Christianity]. Medium.

Mamardashvili M. (1982). Nauka i kul'tura [Science and culture]. In M. Mamardashvili (ed.), Metodologija istoriko-nauchnyh issledovanij [Methodology of historical and scientific research] (pp. 34-54). Nauka.

Mamardashvili, M. (1993). Kartezianskie razmyshlenija [Cartesian reflections]. Progress.

Marks K. (1959). Jekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic-philosophical manuscripts of 1844]. In K. Marks & F. Engel (eds.), Iz rannih proizvedenij [From the first works]. Politizdat.

Marks, K., & Engel, F. (1945). Nemeckaja ideologija. Sochinenija [German Ideology. Compositions], vol.3. (pp. 7-144). Politizdat.

Nietsche, F. (1990). Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe [Human, too human]. Progress.

Sheler M. (1988). Polozhenie cheloveka v Kosmose. V: Problema cheloveka v zapadnoj filosofii [Position of man in Cosmos. In M Sheler (ed.), The human problem is in Western philosophy (pp.31-95). Progress.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-02

How to Cite

Manolachi, V. ., Vizitei, N. ., & Manolachi, V. . (2022). Physical Culture as a Basic Component of the Integral Cultural Act. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(3), 502-509. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.3/622

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>