Efficient Questioning in Teaching Mathematics: Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/694Keywords:
Educational questioning in teaching mathematics, functions of questions, psychological-semiotic approach, semantic support in questions’ wordingAbstract
The paper is an exposure to the latest practices of questioning in teaching and learning math (TLM) on the basis of psychological-semiotic approach. Emphasis is placed on the degree of semantic support of the expected answer when formulating educational questions. The paper explored: whether teachers are able to distinguish between types of questions and to use them in sync with didactic purpose; what types of questions teachers consider to be the most effective; what factors influence this process. To achieve these goals, survey-based research was conducted among 173 high school mathematics teachers across Ukraine. The research proved that, in their majority, teachers are able to correctly distinguish among the types of the questions offered. According to the teachers, questions with full semantic support for the answer are less useful in TLM. The study showed teachers’ lack of ability to identify the goals of the questions. There has been revealed a gap between the teachers’ attitude to the expedience of using questions with several possible answers and the practice of their implementation in TLM. The study yielded 35 variables characterizing the current status of the problem. They were optimized to 13 factors. It was stated that questioning should comply with the content of educational material, and the questions formulated with the use of topical vocabulary known to the students are viewed as most cost-effective. The research revealed the significant impact of the number of questions that teachers or students ask. The factor of primary importance appears to be that of time.
References
Agresti, A. (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wilely.
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Star, J. R. (2011). The skill of asking good questions in mathematics teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1354–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.291
Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 user’s guide. SPSS.
Bingham, C. (2005). The Hermeneutics of Educational Questioning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(4), 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00140.x
Black, S. (2001). Ask Me a Question: How Teachers Use Inquiry in a Classroom. American School Board Journal, 188(5), 43-45.
Boychuk, Y., Novikova, V., Opanasenko, Y., Olena, K., & Kostina, V. (2022). Pedagogical conditions for the introduction of blended learning technologies in ukrainian higher education institutions. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(3), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.3/596
Brahier, D., Leinwand, S., & Huinker, D. (2014). Principles to Actions: Mathematics Programs as the Core for Student Learning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(9), 516. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044582
Cao, H. T. (2018). Teachers’ Capacity of Instruction for Developing Higher – Order Thinking Skills for Upper Secondary Students – A Case Study in Teaching Mathematics in Vietnam. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(1.Suppl), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/33
Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: Finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X1666533
Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. Teachers College Press.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.), (2000). Activating and Engaging Habits of Mind. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dantonio, M., & Beisenherz, P. C. (2001). Learning to Question, Questioning to Learn: Developing Effective Teacher Questioning Practices. Allyn and Bacon.
Davydov, A. N. (2019). "The technology of leading questions" as a teaching method for solving geometric problems for proof. Science And Mathematics Education, 22(6), 556–565.
Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher Questioning Behavior and Student Learning: What Research Says to Teachers. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED359572
Frager, A. M. (1979). Questioning Strategies: Implications for Teacher Training. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED238845
Franke, M., Webb, N., Chan, A., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
Fusco, E. (2012). Effective Questioning Strategies in the Classroom: A Step-by-Step Approach to Engaged Thinking and Learning, K-8, Teacher College Press.
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
Hemmi, K., Krzywacki, H., & Koljonen, T. (2017). Investigating Finnish teacher guides as a resource for mathematics teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(6), 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1307278
Ingram, J., Andrews, N., & Pitt, A. (2019). When students offer explanations without the teacher explicitly asking them to. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9873-9
Kress, N. E. (2017). 6 Essential Questions for Problem Solving. The Mathematics Teacher, 111(3), 190-196. http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~glarose/dept/teaching/resources/KressMathematicsTeacher.pdf
Kulbyakina, L. Y., & Zotova, T. N. (2004). Questions in the methodology of teaching mathematics. Primary School, 7, 117-121.
Lebedeva, I. P. (2003). On systems of educational questions as a means of stimulating the thinking of junior students. In Modern problems of primary education (pp. 54–68). Perm.
Moberg, E. M. (2008). Socrates Lives: Dialogue as a Means of Teaching and Learning. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507870
Nasledov, А. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and AMOS: professional statistical data analysis. Peter.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to action. Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Pape, S., Bell, C., & Yetkin, İ. (2003). Developing Mathematical Thinking and Self-Regulated Learning: A Teaching Experiment in a Seventh-Grade Mathematics Classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026062121857
Piccolo, D. L., Harbaugh, A. P., Carter, T. A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Quality of Instruction: Examining Discourse in Middle School Mathematics Instruction. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 376-410. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-809
Pólya, G. (1945). How to Solve it: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.
Ryve, A., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Educational policy to improve mathematics instruction at scale: conceptualizing contextual factors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 379–394 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09887-6
Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Kornhall, P. (2016). Skola på vetenskaplig grund [School on a scientific basis]. Natur & Kultur.
Schuster, L., & Anderson, N. C. (2005). Good questions for math teaching: why ask them and what to ask, grades 5–8 Math. Math Solutions Publications.
Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. (1977). An Inquiry Into Inquiry: Question-Asking as an Instructional Model. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED158871
Sullivan, P., & Lilburn, P. (2002). Good Questions for Math Teaching: Why Ask Them and What to Ask, K–6. Math Solutions Publications.
Tarasenkova, N. (2002). The use of sign-symbolic means in teaching mathematics. Vidlunnya-Plus.
Webb, D. C. (2016). Applying Principles for Active Learning to Promote Student Engagement in Undergraduate Calculus [Conference presentation]. 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, 24-31 July 2016.
Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: funneling or focusing? In H. Steinbring, M. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167-178). NCTM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
