Artistry as a Factor of the Professionalism of the Future Teacher

Authors

  • Tetiana Tkachenko Kharkiv National University of Arts named after I. P. Kotlyarevsky, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Viktoriia Prokopchuk Rivne State University of the Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine
  • Yuliia Kolisnyk-Humeniuk National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Alla Kurinna Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Oksana Strikhar Nikolaev National University named after V.O. Sukhomlinsky, Nikolaev, Ukraine
  • Svitlana Bilozerska Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.4Sup1/662

Keywords:

Pedagogical artistry, learning process, teacher’s personality, pedagogical activity, professionalism of a future teacher, theatrical pedagogy

Abstract

The article addresses to the modern ideas about pedagogical artistry, briefly discusses the methods of its implementation, lists the main components and highlights its functions and the role in the process of the professionalism formation of the future teacher.

The role of the teacher has changed: the modern teacher is a leader not only of information but also of culture, a spiritual mentor. To cope with this task, he needs a developed mindset, the ability to empathize, to imitate, co-create and empathize. He must be able to maintain his creative form. In other words, a creative educator must master artistry.

The purpose of the article is to consider the role of artistry in the professional qualities formation of a future teacher at the present stage of education development in Ukraine, as well as to consider and analyze the elements of “theater” pedagogy in the future teachers’ training.

In the article the authors make conclusion that pedagogical artistry can be defined as the ability to organic existence and effective action in the pedagogical process. This ability is associated with the knowledge of the teacher and the development of his pedagogical thinking also with mastering the art of self-expression (ability to embody thought and experience in image, behavior, word), improvisation, ability to regulate mental state, constructing “scores of pedagogical communication”.

References

Akkerman, S., & Meijer, P. (2010). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013

Amonashvili, S. (1990). Lichnostno-gumannaia osnova pedagogicheskogo protsessa [Personality and humane basis of the pedagogical process]. University.

Barbina, Е. (2001). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy professionalnoi podgotovki budushchikh uchitelei. Nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie [Theoretical and methodological bases of professional training of future teachers. Scientific and methodical manual]. Kherson.

Bilenko, L., & Sisoeva S. (1993). Vyvchaemo tvorchu dialnist pedagoga [We study the creative activity of the teacher]. Native School.

Bolton, G. (1984). Drama as education: An argument for placing drama at the centre of the curriculum. Longman.

Bowell, P., & Heap, B. (2017). Putting process drama into action: The dynamics of practice. Routledge.

Bulatova, О. (2001). Pedagogicheskii artistism: uchebnoe posobie dlia studentov vysshykh pedagogicheskikh zavedenii [Pedagogical artistry: textbook for students of higher pedagogical universities]. Academy.

Butenko, V. (1995). Estetychni orientyry pedagogichnoi pratsi [Aesthetic guidelines of pedagogical work]. Etnoestetics of the teacher’s work. https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=NdvZaCYAAAAJ&hl=ru

Dunn, J., & Stinson, M. (2011). Not without the art! The importance of teacher artistry when applying drama as pedagogy for additional language learning. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 16(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2011.617110

Eisner E. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4), 375–385. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/From-episteme-to-phronesis-to-artistry-in-the-study-Eisner/6fc98345a47fdeb3f752c6b79307fde5d3983881

Gallagher, K., Freeman, B., & Wessells, A. (2010). ‘It could have been so much better’: The aesthetic and social work of theatre. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780903480971

Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195

Kosholap, A., Maksymchuk, B., Branitska, T., Martynets, L., Boichenko, A., Stoliarenko, O., Matsuk, L., Surovov, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuropsychological Bases of Self-Improvement of Own Physical Health of Future Teachers in the Course of University Education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/226

Kutsevol О. (2007). Portret tvorchoho vchytelia literatury [Portrait of a creative literature teacher]. Dyvoslovo, 1, 24–29.

Maksymchuk, I., Maksymchuk, B., Frytsiuk, V., Matviichuk, T., Demchenko, I., Babii, I., & Savchuk, I. (2018). Developing pedagogical mastery of future physical education teachers in higher education institutions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(2), 810–815. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.02119

Ministry of Education. (1996). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro osvitu” [Law of Ukraine “On Education”]. Informational bulletin. https://osv-osvita.gov.ua/zakon-ukraini-pro-osvitu-12-12-55-13-05-2020/

Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

O’Neill, C. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Heinemann Drama.

Pasichnyk Ye. (2000). Metodyka vykladannia ukrainskoi literatury v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh: navchaknyi posibnyk dlia studentiv vyshchikh zakladiv osvity [Methods of teaching Ukrainian literature in secondary schools: textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. Lenvut. http://padaread.com/?book=85653

Piatsoli E. (2012). Engage or entertain? The nature of teacher/participant collaboration in process drama for additional language teaching. Scenario: Journal for Performative Teaching, Learning and Research, 4(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.6.2.5

Potashnyk M. (2009). Upravlenie pofessionalnym rostom uchitelia v sovremennoi shkole: metod. posobie [Management of professional growth of the teacher in modern school: textbook]. CPO. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01004376094

State National Program. (1994). Derzhavna natsionalna prohrama “Osvita” (Ukraina XXI stolittia) [State National Program “Education” (Ukraine XXI century)]. https://pidru4niki.com/81983/pedagogika/derzhavna_natsionalna_programa_osvita_ukrayina

Sukhomlinskyi, V. (1976). Rozmova z molodym dyrektorom shkoly. Besida 1. Osnovni problemy tvorchoi pratsi vchytelia [Conversation with a young school principal. Conversation 1. The main problems of creative work of the teacher], vol. 4 (pp. 414–446). Studmed. https://www.studmed.ru/suhomlinskiy-vo-vibran-tvori-b-5-tomah_c4b55ef8e01.html

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20

How to Cite

Tkachenko, T., Prokopchuk, V., Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Y., Kurinna, A., Strikhar, O., & Bilozerska, S. (2022). Artistry as a Factor of the Professionalism of the Future Teacher. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(4 Sup.1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.4Sup1/662

Most read articles by the same author(s)