Neuro-Pedagogical Aspects of Forming the Professional Competence of Elementary School Teachers and Their Interaction with Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.4Sup1/663Keywords:
Reforming the educational process, elementary school, professional teaching competence, neuro-pedagogy, neuro-didactics, innovative teaching methodsAbstract
It was found that the concept of modernization of Ukrainian education, especially primary education in the reform "New Ukrainian School", puts forward new social requirements for school education, requires the introduction of innovative learning technologies in the educational process, the basis of which is ultramodern teaching methodology, progressive didactic tools, psychological and neuro-pedagogical theories.
Justified the use of innovative technologies as a means of forming professional competence, which is associated with a rejection of stereotypes in education, goes beyond existing standards of education and personal development of the student; creates new standards for personal, creative, individual focus of the teacher, allows the application of new neuro-pedagogical technologies.
The most effective innovative methods of teaching and professional development of teachers of junior classes of the New Ukrainian school, created taking into account the achievements of neuro-pedagogy are highlighted, namely: game, problem-oriented, team-oriented, project-based methods, the portfolio method, information and communication technologies.
Activation of cognitive activity of students, taking into account their individual neuro-didactic characteristics affecting the degree of their involvement in the educational process was investigated.
References
Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum. PT Refika Aditama.
Adolf, V. A. (1998). Professyonalnaia kompetentnost sovremennoho uchytelia: monohrafyia [Professional competence of a modern teacher: a monograph]. Krasnoyarsk Siberian Federal University.
Altuhova, O. S. (2021). Ispol'zovanie informacionno-kommunikacionnykh tekhnologij v rabote pedagoga-psikhologa s det'mi [The use of information and communication technologies in the work of a teacher-psychologist with children]. Solncesvet. https://solncesvet.ru/opublikovannyie-materialyi/ispolzovanie-informacionno-kommunikacion2396002/
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. (1963). Social learning and personality development. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Bekh, I. D. (2012). Refleksyvno-eksplitsytnyi metod u vykhovanni osobystosti [Reflexive-explicit method in personality education]. Native school, 12, 3-7.
Berbets, T., Berbets, V., Babii, I., Chyrva, O., Malykhin, A., Sushentseva, L., MEDYNSKII, S., Riaboshapka, O., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Maksymchuk, I., & Maksymchuk, B. (2021). Developing Independent Creativity in Pupils: Neuroscientific Discourse and Ukraine’s Experience. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/252
Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education. Blackwell.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. David McKey Co.
Bondarchuk, N. Y., & Chernov, V. D. (2019). Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty fizychnoho vykhovannia shkoliariv z urakhuvanniam yikhnikh psykhodynamichnykh vlastyvostei [Theoretical and methodological aspects of physical education of schoolchildren taking into account their psychodynamic properties]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod University, 1(44). 13-17. https://doi.org/10.24144/2524-0609.2019.44.13-17
Bransford, J. D., Zech, L., Schwartz, D. L., Barron B. J., Vye, N. J., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (2000). Design environments that invite and sustain mathematical thinking. In P. Cobb (Ed.), Symbolizing, communicating and mathematizing: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 275–324). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: a bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026008004
Burgess, A., & Mellis, C. (2015). Team-based learning in health care education: maintaining key design elements. Journal of Nursing and Care, S1, 008. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.S1-008
Burgess, A., McGregor, D., & Mellis, C. (2014). Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review. Academic Medicine, 89, 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162
Clement, N. D., & Lovat, T. (2012). Neuroscience and education: issues and challenges for curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 534–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00602.x
Clements, D. H. (2000). From Exercises and Tasks to Problems and Projects – unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 9-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00036-5
Connell, M. L. (1997). Technology in Constructivist Mathematics Classrooms. In J. Willis, J. Price, S. McNeil, B. Robin & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1997--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 601-604). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Cox, M. J. (1993). The Project Design and Method. In D. Watson (Ed.) Impact – an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. Department for Education and King’s College London.
Danylenko, L. I. (2015). Pedahohichni umovy formuvannia hotovnosti vchytelia u pisliadyplomnii osviti do zastosuvannia innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii interaktyvnoho navchannia [Pedagogical conditions of formation of readiness of the teacher in postgraduate education to application of innovative technologies of interactive training]. Scientific notes of Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after Mykhailo Kotsyubynsky. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 44, 123-127.
Davis, A. (2004). The credentials of brain-based learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00361.x
Davis, M. H., & Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2006). Portfolios, projects and dissertations. In J. A. Dent, R. M. Harden (Eds.), A practical guide for medical teachers. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
Demchenko, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilan, V., Maksymchuk, I., & Kalynovska, I. (2021). Training Future Physical Education Teachers for Professional Activities under the Conditions of Inclusive Education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/227
Diamond, A., & Amso, D. (2008). Contributions of neuroscience to our understanding of cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00563.x
Dubrovina, I.V., Andreeva, A. D., Danilova, E. E., & Vohmyanina, T. V. (1998). Psihokorrekcionnaya i razvivayushchaya rabota s det’mi [Psychocorrectional and developmental work with children]. Akademiya.
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E, & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Stylus.
Dychkivska, I. M. (2004). Innovatsiini pedahohichni tekhnolohii: navchalnyi posibnyk [Innovative pedagogical technologies: a textbook]. Academy issued.
Elouafi, L., Lotfi, S., &Talbi, M. (2021). Progress Report in Neuroscience and Education: Experiment of Four Neuropedagogical Methods. Education Sciences, 11(8), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080373
Fatade, A. O. (2013). Effect of PBL. On Senior Second Students’ Achivement I Futher Mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6, 28-44. http://padi.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro/adn/article_6_3_4.pdf
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. [Man in search of meaning. Transl. with English and German]. Progress.
Furlong, J. (2013). Educationalists must do better. Times Higher Education.
Geake, J., & Cooper, P. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: implications for education? Westminster Studies in Education, 26(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140672030260102
Grace, C. (1992). The Portfolio And Its Use: Developmentally Appropriate Assessment of Young Children. Eric Digest.
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and Education: Myths and Messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1992). A Pedagogy for Mathematical Microworlds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302313
Inforurok. (2018). Informatsiinyi portal [Information portal]. Inforurok. https://infourok.ru/innovacionnie-tehnologii-v-rabote-uchitelya-nachalnih-klassov-kak-uslovie-formirovaniya-professionalnoy-kompetentnosti-pedagoga--3890800.html
Jalal, F., & Sardjunani, N. (2005). Increasing literacy in Indonesia. Adult Education and Development, 67, 131. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146011
Joo, K. H., & Park, N. H. H. (2015). e-PBL Model Development for Computer Learning System. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(3), 323-332. https://m.earticle.net/Article/A241992
Karasievych, S., Maksymchuk, B., Kuzmenko, V., Slyusarenko, N., Romanyshyna, O., Syvokhop, E., Kolomiitseva, O., Romanishyna, L., Marionda, I., Vykhrushch, V., Oliinyk, M., Kovalchuk, A., Halaidiuk, M., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Training Future Physical Education Teachers for Physical and Sports Activities: Neuropedagogical Approach. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/264
Kazachonak, V. V. (2020). Application of neural networks in training. Informatics and education, 2, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-2-41-47
Khutorskoi, A. V. (2005). Tekhnologiya proyektirovaniya klyuchevykh i predmetnykh kompetentsiy [Technology of designing key and subject competencies]. Eidos online magazine. http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2005/1212.htm
Kosholap, A., Maksymchuk, B., Branitska, T., Martynets, L., Boichenko, A., Stoliarenko, O., Matsuk, L., Surovov, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuropsychological Bases of Self-Improvement of Own Physical Health of Future Teachers in the Course of University Education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/226
Kostyuchenko, E. V. (2015). Psikhotekhniki sensorno-perceptivnoj aktivizacii [Psychotechnics of sensory-perceptual activation]. Psychological Journal, 2(2), 56-64.
Koval, L. V. (2011). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv u konteksti rozvytku pochatkovoi osvity: tekhnolohichnyi pidkhid [monograph] [Professional training of future teachers in the context of primary education development: technological approach: [monograph]. LANDON-XXI.
Kozma, R. (2003). Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change: A Global Perspective. ISTE.
Krutin, Y. V. (2016). Informacionnye tekhnologii v psikhologii [Information technology in psychology]. Ekaterinburg.
Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research. University of Chicago Press.
Leech, N. L. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Compendium of Techniques and a Framework for Selection for School Psychology Research and Beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587
Luria, A. R. (1975). Osnovnye problemy nejrolingvistiki [The main problems of neurolinguistics]. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Makarenko, A. C. (1984). Pedahohycheskye sochynenyia [Pedagogical works]. Pedagogy.
Malsagov, A. A. (2016, December 25). Nejrodidaktika ob obrazovanii vzroslykh. Novshestva v oblasti pedagogiki i psikhologii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Neurodidactics on adult education. Innovations in the field of pedagogy and psychology].Tyumen. https://evansys.com/articles/novshestva-v-oblasti-pedagogiki-i-psikhologii-sbornik-nauchnykh-trudov-po-itogam-mezhdunarodnoy-nauch/sektsiya-1-obshchaya-pedagogika-istoriya-pedagogiki-i-obrazova/neyrodidaktika-ob-obrazovanii-vzroslykh/
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Matsko, O. M. (2016). Neverbalni zasoby u pedahohichnii kulturi vykladacha [Non-verbal means in the pedagogical culture of the teacher]. Scientific letters of academic society of Michal Baludansky, 4(2), 89-92.
Miller, L. (2015). Role-Play Games as a Tool for STEM Career Inspiration and the Development of Scientific Possible Selves. In Global Learn (pp. 385-389). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Ministry of Education. (2018). Standart vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy (spetsialnist 013 «Pochatkova osvita») [Standard of higher education of Ukraine (specialty 013 «Primary education»)]. Ministry of Education. https://imzo.gov.ua/osvita/vyscha-osvita/1719-2/
Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J., Bramald, S., Newton, L., Tymms, P., Henderson, B., & Stout, J. (1999). Effective Pedagogy Using ICT for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools. University of Newcastle.
Moskvin, V. A. (2008). Mezhpolusharnaya assimetriya i individual'nye stili ehmocional'nogo reagirovaniya [Interhemispheric asymmetry and individual styles of emotional response]. Questions psychologists, 6, 116-120.
Moskvin, V. A., & Moskvina, N. V. (1997). Nejropedagogika kak novoe napravlenie obrazovatel'nykh tekhnologij [Neuropedagogy as a new direction of educational technologies]. In Technologies of the educational process. Orenburg State University Publishing House.
Murray, D. (1992). IT Capability in Primary Schools – a case of something lost in the translation. Journal for Computer Assisted Learning, 8, 96-103.
Myronchuk, N. M. (2014). Diialnisnyi pidkhid u profesiinii pidhotovtsi maibutnikh pedahohiv do realizatsii funktsii uchytelia-vykhovatelia [Activity approach in professional training of future teachers to the implementation of the functions of teacher-educator]. Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko, 4, 85-88. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VZhDU_2014_4_18/
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
Paniotova, Yu. D. (2020). Suchasni innovatsiini osvitni tekhnolohii u profesiino-pedahohichnii diialnosti vchytelia pochatkovykh klasiv [Today’s innovative educational technologies in the professional and pedagogical activities of primary school teachers]. Nice 220. https://nice2020.jimdofree.com/9/
Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook S., & Hudes P. D. (2012). Team-based learning: a practical guide. AMEE guide. № 65. Medical Teacher, 34, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
Paulson, F. L., Paulsun, P., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48, 60-63. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199102_paulson.pdf
Pavlov, I. P. (1951). Refleksy golovnogo mozga [Brain reflexes.]. Science.
Pecherkyna, A. A., Symaniuk, E., & Umnykova, E. L. (2011). Razvytye professyonalnoi kompetentnosty pedahoha: teoryia y praktyka [Development of professional competence of the teacher: theory and practice]. Uralsky State Pedagogical Univeresity.
Piekhota, O. M., & Ziaziun, I. A. (2003). Pidhotovka maibutnoho vchytelia do vprovadzhennia pedahohichnykh tekhnolohii [Training future teachers for the introduction of pedagogical technologies]. ASK Publishing House.
Pizzolato, J. E. (2007). Impossible selves: Investigating students’ persistence decisions when their career-possible selves border on impossible. Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845306296644
Prots, R., Yakovliv, V., Medynskyi, S., Kharchenko, R., Hryb, T., Klymenchenko, T., Ihnatenko, S., Buzhyna, I., & Maksymchuk, B. (2021). Psychophysical Training of Young People for Homeland Defence Using means of Physical Culture and Sports. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/225
Rogers, K. (1994). Vzglyad na psikhoterapiyu [A look at psychotherapy]. Becoming human.
Samoilenko, N. I. (2018). Rol hendernoho vykhovannia u formuvanni osobystosti shkoliara [The role of gender education in the formation of the student's personality]. Dnmcps. https://dnmcps.com.ua/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-10/2018-10-09-1/prava.pdf
Sarancha, I., Maksymchuk, B., Gordiichuk, G., Berbets, T., Berbets, V., Chepurna, L., Golub, V., Chernichenko, L., Behas, L., Roienko, S., Bezliudna, N., Rassskazova, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuroscientific Principles in Labour Adaptation of People with Musculoskeletal Disorders. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/245
Schell, J. (2017). Design Thinking Has a Pedagogy Problem … And a Way Forward. Designcreativetech. https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/design-thinking-has-pedagogy-problem-way-forward
Shenderovskyi, V. A. (2009). «Ni, ya ukrainets!» – Kostiantyn Ushynsky. Nekhai ne hasne svit nauky. Knyha persha [«No, I’m Ukrainian!» - Konstantin Ushinsky. Let the world of science not go out. Book one.]. Publishing House «Prostir»
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-23. https://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/shulman.pdf
Smoleusova, T. V. (2012). Sostoianye professyonalnoi hotovnosty uchytelei nachalnoi shkolы k vnedrenyiu ynnovatsyi [The state of professional readiness of primary school teachers to implement innovations]. Science for Education Today, 7(3), 5-17.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Educational psychology has fallen, but it can get up. Educational psychology review, 8(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02160680
Strutsenko, L. A. (2003). Samoobrazovaniye i innovatsionnyy poisk uchitelya: modul'nyy podkhod k oriyentatsii pedagoga na innovatsionnuyu deyatel'nost' v razvivayushcheysya shkole [Self-education and innovative search for a teacher: a modular approach to the teacher's orientation to innovative activities in the developing school]. Symposium Series, Innovation and Education. In Proceedings of the conference, 29, (pp. 347-359). St. Petersburg Philosophical Society.
Sukhomlynsky, V. O. (1988). Sto porad uchytelevi [One hundred tips for teachers]. Pedagogy.
Vinnikova V. (2017). Igrovye formy obucheniya: kogda uchit'sya interesno i radostno [Game forms of learning: when learning is interesting and joyful]. Expert. https://svp.expert/pedagogika/igrovye-formy-obucheniya-kogda-uchitsya-interesno-i-radostno/
Volkova, N. P. (2007). Pedahohika [Pedagogy] (2nd). Akademizdav.
Vovk, L. M. (2015). Pedahohichni umovy formuvannia hendernoi identychnosti molodshykh shkoliariv. Psykholohiia i pedahohika: aktualni pytannia [Pedagogical conditions for the formation of gender identity of primary school students]. In Psychology and pedagogy: current issues: collection of theses of the international scientific-practical conference, Kharkiv, April 10-11, 2015 (pp. 85-90). East Ukraine Organization Center for Pedagogical Research.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1956). Myshlenie i rech' [Thinking and speech]. Pedagogy.
Willis, J. A. (2012). Neurologist Makes the Case for Teaching Teachers About the Brain. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/neuroscience-higher-ed-judy-willis
Wood, C. (2001). Users and Abusers. Teaching ICT, 1(2), 8-10.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407
Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Brzustoski, P., Master, A., Hessert, W. T., Williams, M. E., & Cohen, G. L. (2014). Breaking the cycle of mistrust: Wise interventions to provide critical feedback across the racial divide. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 804–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033906
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
