Pedagogical Philosophy as a New Independent Scientific Theory

Authors

  • Vitalii Kurylo Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University
  • Olena Karaman Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University
  • Nataliya Kurylo Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/693

Keywords:

pedagogical philosophy, philosophy of education, logical foundations, educational space

Abstract

The challenges of the modern, global, fast-changing world require that theoreticians and practitioners in the sphere of education should focus their efforts not only on finding innovative forms, methods and technologies of teaching, but also on reconsidering the entire philosophy of organization and functioning of the educational space, which inevitably leads to the need of developing a new independent scientific and pedagogical theory – pedagogical philosophy.

Comparing pedagogical philosophy with the philosophy of education (teaching), defining the subject and object of the new pedagogical science, the author formulates its main elements: a) the leading ideas; b) the basic concepts and categories; c) the fundamental laws and regularities; d) the main principles and rules of application of the theory in practice during the organization of educational processes in real time. The main ideas of the new theory of pedagogical philosophy are as follows:

  1. The idea of recognizing the life of the younger generation and each individual person as the main and leading value of the entire educational space that has been built or is currently being built;
  2. The idea of showing an essential and constant concern of the adult generation for the conditions, development and strengthening of the comprehensive health of the younger generation at all the stages of their maturation;
  3. The idea of introducing psychological and pedagogical, socio-pedagogical and philosophical-pedagogical favoring for a free development and maturation of the younger generation and each individual person in real time in the educational space;
  4. The idea of the imperative of restricting, at all levels of educational administration, permissive, prohibitive and controlling functions and expanding organizational and search-and-creative ones, focused on the protection of comprehensive health of the younger generations and the introduction of constructive processes in their real life by fully suppressing and limiting the destructive ones.

Author Biographies

Olena Karaman, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor, head of the educational and scientific institute of pedagogy and psychology

Nataliya Kurylo, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Poltava, Ukraine

References

Adler, J. E. (2003). Knowledge, Truth, and Learning. A Companion to the Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Alexander, H. A. (2006). A View from Somewhere: Explaining the Paradigms of Educational Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 205–221.

Bacon, F. (2014). The Essays and Counsels, Civil and Moral of Francis Bacon: all 3 volumes in a single file. B&R Samizdat Express.

Bailey, R., Barrow, R., Carr, D., & McCarthy, C. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of philosophy of education. London: SAGE Publications.

Berkeley, G. (2013). The Works. The correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2008). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell.

Camus, A. (2021). The Plague. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Carr, D. (2003). Making Sense of Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Theory of Education. London: Routledge Falmer.

Chambliss, J. 2009. Philosophy of Education Today. Educational Theory, 59(2), 233–251.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Radical Priorities. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

Comte, A. (1903). A Discourse on the Positive Spirit. London: Reeves.

Deleuze, G., Guattari,F. (1996). What is philosophy?. New-York: Columbia University Press.

Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in logical theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Diderot, D. (2009). Epicureanism [abridged]. The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2009.

Gershunsky, B. (1998). Philosophy of Education for the XXI Century. Moscow: Sovershenstvo.

Gessen, S. (1995). Fundamentals of pedagogy: Introduction to applied philosophy. Moscow: Nauka.

Hayden, M. (2012). What Do Philosophers of Education Do? An Empirical Study of Philosophy of Education Journals. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(1), 1–27.

Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hickman, L. A. (2009). John Dewey’s Educational Philosophy in International Perspective: A New Democracy for the Twenty-First Century. Carbonadale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1983). De cive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jaspers, K. (1959). The idea of the university. Boston: Beacon Press.

Kenny, A. (2010). A new history of Western philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.

Kerr, D. (2006). Teaching Autonomy: The Obligations of Liberal Education in Plural Societies. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(6), 425–456.

Korotyaev, B. (2009). Selected pedagogical works (in 4 volumes). Luhansk: Alma Mater.

Kremen, V. (2009). Philosophy of humanocentrism in the strategies of educational space. Kyiv: Pedagogichna Dumka.

Locke, John. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mayo, C. (2011). Philosophy of education is bent. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(5), 471–476.

Noddings, N. (2007). Philosophy of education. Cambridge MA: Westview.

Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge.

Sartre, J.-P. (1968). Search for a method. New York: Random House.

Siegel, H. (2009). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education. New York: Oxford University.

Spencer, H. (1901). Essays: Moral, political and speculative. London: Williams and Norgate.

Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.

Wilson, J. (2003). The concept of education revisited. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(1), 101–108.

Yevtukh, M. (2013). Pedagogical psychology. Kyiv: Condor.

Zyazyun, I. (2011). Educational paradigms and pedagogical technologies in philosophy of education. Scientific Journal of the Moscow State University named after V.O.Sukhomlinskiy, 1(28), 21–27. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/5763/1/tmp191C4444444444.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Kurylo, V., Karaman, O., & Kurylo, N. (2023). Pedagogical Philosophy as a New Independent Scientific Theory. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 15(1), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/693

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now