Pedagogical Philosophy as a New Independent Scientific Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/693Keywords:
pedagogical philosophy, philosophy of education, logical foundations, educational spaceAbstract
The challenges of the modern, global, fast-changing world require that theoreticians and practitioners in the sphere of education should focus their efforts not only on finding innovative forms, methods and technologies of teaching, but also on reconsidering the entire philosophy of organization and functioning of the educational space, which inevitably leads to the need of developing a new independent scientific and pedagogical theory – pedagogical philosophy.
Comparing pedagogical philosophy with the philosophy of education (teaching), defining the subject and object of the new pedagogical science, the author formulates its main elements: a) the leading ideas; b) the basic concepts and categories; c) the fundamental laws and regularities; d) the main principles and rules of application of the theory in practice during the organization of educational processes in real time. The main ideas of the new theory of pedagogical philosophy are as follows:
- The idea of recognizing the life of the younger generation and each individual person as the main and leading value of the entire educational space that has been built or is currently being built;
- The idea of showing an essential and constant concern of the adult generation for the conditions, development and strengthening of the comprehensive health of the younger generation at all the stages of their maturation;
- The idea of introducing psychological and pedagogical, socio-pedagogical and philosophical-pedagogical favoring for a free development and maturation of the younger generation and each individual person in real time in the educational space;
- The idea of the imperative of restricting, at all levels of educational administration, permissive, prohibitive and controlling functions and expanding organizational and search-and-creative ones, focused on the protection of comprehensive health of the younger generations and the introduction of constructive processes in their real life by fully suppressing and limiting the destructive ones.
References
Adler, J. E. (2003). Knowledge, Truth, and Learning. A Companion to the Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Alexander, H. A. (2006). A View from Somewhere: Explaining the Paradigms of Educational Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 205–221.
Bacon, F. (2014). The Essays and Counsels, Civil and Moral of Francis Bacon: all 3 volumes in a single file. B&R Samizdat Express.
Bailey, R., Barrow, R., Carr, D., & McCarthy, C. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of philosophy of education. London: SAGE Publications.
Berkeley, G. (2013). The Works. The correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2008). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell.
Camus, A. (2021). The Plague. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Carr, D. (2003). Making Sense of Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Theory of Education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Chambliss, J. 2009. Philosophy of Education Today. Educational Theory, 59(2), 233–251.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Radical Priorities. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Comte, A. (1903). A Discourse on the Positive Spirit. London: Reeves.
Deleuze, G., Guattari,F. (1996). What is philosophy?. New-York: Columbia University Press.
Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in logical theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Diderot, D. (2009). Epicureanism [abridged]. The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2009.
Gershunsky, B. (1998). Philosophy of Education for the XXI Century. Moscow: Sovershenstvo.
Gessen, S. (1995). Fundamentals of pedagogy: Introduction to applied philosophy. Moscow: Nauka.
Hayden, M. (2012). What Do Philosophers of Education Do? An Empirical Study of Philosophy of Education Journals. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(1), 1–27.
Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hickman, L. A. (2009). John Dewey’s Educational Philosophy in International Perspective: A New Democracy for the Twenty-First Century. Carbonadale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1983). De cive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1959). The idea of the university. Boston: Beacon Press.
Kenny, A. (2010). A new history of Western philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, D. (2006). Teaching Autonomy: The Obligations of Liberal Education in Plural Societies. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(6), 425–456.
Korotyaev, B. (2009). Selected pedagogical works (in 4 volumes). Luhansk: Alma Mater.
Kremen, V. (2009). Philosophy of humanocentrism in the strategies of educational space. Kyiv: Pedagogichna Dumka.
Locke, John. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mayo, C. (2011). Philosophy of education is bent. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(5), 471–476.
Noddings, N. (2007). Philosophy of education. Cambridge MA: Westview.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge.
Sartre, J.-P. (1968). Search for a method. New York: Random House.
Siegel, H. (2009). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education. New York: Oxford University.
Spencer, H. (1901). Essays: Moral, political and speculative. London: Williams and Norgate.
Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.
Wilson, J. (2003). The concept of education revisited. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(1), 101–108.
Yevtukh, M. (2013). Pedagogical psychology. Kyiv: Condor.
Zyazyun, I. (2011). Educational paradigms and pedagogical technologies in philosophy of education. Scientific Journal of the Moscow State University named after V.O.Sukhomlinskiy, 1(28), 21–27. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/5763/1/tmp191C4444444444.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
