Increasing School Performance in Theoretical Sports Training Classes by Applying Students’ Activation Strategies

Authors

  • Liliana Elisabeta Radu Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Iasi, Romania
  • Ileana Monica Popovici Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Iasi, Romania
  • Cristian Mihail Rus Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.4Sup1/674

Keywords:

interactive strategies, school performance, small groups, cooperation, critical thinking

Abstract

The current paper summarizes the results of the study which carried out between September 2021 and January 2022, in order to determine to what extent, the use of interactive didactic strategies can achieve the cognitive performance of the target group, the students of the High School with Sports Program in Iași, Romania. The study included two groups of students from two parallel 10th school classes, A and B, aged 16-17. The number of subjects participating in our study was 56, of which 28 in each class. All subjects participating in the study passed the 9th school class at the same high school, having continuity, because the Theoretical Sports Training discipline is also taught in the previous school class. The methods used challenged and supported the students in the experimental group to successfully complete the learning tasks throughout the lessons. We observed that: acquisition facilitation was achieved; students were actively involved in their own learning, using their own intellectual and practical skills; students were less reluctant to present and argue their own opinions, capitalized on their prior knowledge experience, communicated efficiently; students cooperated within the group, obtaining benefits in the cognitive, motivational, social, affective plans.

References

Abed, A. Z., Sameer, S. A., Kasim, M. A., Othman, A. T. (2020). Predicting Effect Implementing the Jigsaw Strategy on the Academic Achievement of Students in Mathematics Classes. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1) Article No: em0558. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5940

Baena-Morales, S., Jerez-Mayorga, D., Fernandez-Gonzales, F.T., Lopez-Morales, J. (2020). The Use of a Cooperative-Learning Activity with University Students: A Gender Experience. Sustainability, 12(21), 9292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219292

Demarle-Meusel, H., Rottenhofer, M., Albaner, B., & Sabitzer, B. (2020, October). Educational Pyramid Scheme–A Sustainable Way Of Bringing Innovations To School. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Garcia, M. B. (2021). Cooperative learning in computer programming: A quasi-experimental evaluation of Jigsaw teaching strategy with novice programmers. Education and Information Technologies. 26, 4839–4856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10502-6

Goolsarran, N., Hamo, C. E., & Lu, W. H. (2020). Using the jigsaw technique to teach patient safety. Medical education online, 25(1), 1710325.

Indeed Editorial Team (Updated August 26, 2022 | Published September 30, 2021) What Is the Learning Pyramid? (7 Elements, Goals and Tips). https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/learning-pyramid?utm_c=&utm_campaign=earnedsocial%3Acareerguide%3Asharedirectshare%3AUS

Jony, M. S. (2019). Exploring the effectiveness of cooperative learning at secondary level in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(1), 93-99.

Keramati, Mohammad & Gillies, Robyn. (2021). Advantages and Challenges of Cooperative Learning in Two Different Cultures. Education Sciences, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010003 .

Lalley, J., & Miller, R. (2007). The learning pyramid: Does it point teachers in the right direction. Education, 128(1), 16.

Letrud, K. (2012). A Rebuttal Of Ntl InstituteʼS Learning Pyramid. Education, 133(1), 117-124.

M. van Wyk, M. (2015). Using the Jigsaw Teaching Strategy for the Advance of Economics Teachers’ Acquisition of Knowledge. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 10 (2): 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11917621

Oprea, C. L. (2006). Strategii didactice interactive. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică

Sawyer, J., & Obeid, R. (2017). Cooperative and collaborative learning: Getting the best of both words. How we teach now: the GSTA guide to student-centered teaching, 163-177.

Teach the Earth the portal for Earth Education (accessed 2022, November) Why Use Jigsaws. Teaching Methods A Collection of Pedagogic Techniques and Example Activities. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTworkshops/teaching_methods/jigsaws/why.html

Tiron, E., Stanciu, T. (2019). Teoria şi metodologia instruirii. Teoria şi metodologia evaluării. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică

Torabi, Z.A., Rezvani, M.R., Palouj, M. (2022). Comparing the Effect of Lecture and Jigsaw Teaching Strategies on Attitude and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Mixed-methods Approach. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 23(4), 1064-1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2021.1955235

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20

How to Cite

Radu, L. E. ., Popovici, I. M. ., & Rus , C. M. . (2022). Increasing School Performance in Theoretical Sports Training Classes by Applying Students’ Activation Strategies. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(4 Sup.1), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.4Sup1/674

Most read articles by the same author(s)


Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now