Formation of Specialists’ Professional Competence in Art Specialities Using the Pedagogy of Dissensus: Features of a Development of the Postmodern Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.2/738Keywords:
Art, art education, improvement of professional training, educational program, innovations, postmodernAbstract
The relevance of the outlined problem is determined by the need for an anticipatory development of the educational sphere, in particular, improvement of the process of training specialists in art specialties at institutions of higher education, taking into account peculiarities of postmodern development of society. Taking into account the results of the generalization of theoretical searches, existing innovative processes in art education are singled out and analyzed (updating regulatory support, creating original scientific and methodological support for the formation of professional competence, implementing innovative educational programs, using information and communication technologies, implementing a quality management system for higher education, etc.). On the basis of the generalization of the conducted research work, the theoretical model of improving the professional training of future specialists in art by means of pedagogy of dissensus is substantiated. The model describes the goal, subject, object, process, and expected result. The means of pedagogy of dissensus (integrativeness, communicative behavior, dissensus, argumentative speech, different readings of the content of artistic works, etc.) and the peculiarities of their use in the process of training art specialists are characterized. Prospects for further research consist in detailing the model of improving the professional training of future art specialists by means of pedagogy of dissensus and developing effective means of control in order to organize a pedagogical experiment under the conditions of a real educational process.
References
Asterhan, C. S. C., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.312
Atkinson, D. (2018). Art, Disobedience, and Ethics: The Adventure of Pedagogy. Springer.
Atkinson, E. (2004). Conducting and Interpreting Educational Research: A Postmodern Perspective. Education and Society, 22(1), 27–43(17). https://doi.org/10.7459/es/22.1.03
Berbets, T., Berbets, V., Babii, I., Chyrva, O., Malykhin, A., Sushentseva, L., … Maksymchuk, B. (2021). Developing Independent Creativity in Pupils: Neuroscientific Discourse and Ukraine’s Experience. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/252
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy. Paradigm.
Boden, M. (2011). Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise. Oxford University Press.
Dembitska, S.V., & Kuzmenko, O. S. (2021). Improvement of Self-Educational Activity of Students of Technical Specialties Based on Innovative Society Development (on the Example of Studying Physics). Knowledge, Education, Law, Management, 2(38), 24–30.
Dembitska, S.V., & Kuzmenko, O. S. (2022). Innovative Trends in Higher Education in the Context of Sustainable Development (on the Example of Physics and Technics Disciplines). In A. Ostenda & V. Smachylo (eds.) Science and education for sustainable development. Katowice (pp. 203–209). doi: 10.54264/M005.
Donovan, C. (2013). Beyond the Postmodern University. The European Legacy, 18(1), 24–41(18). https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2013.748119
Ellaway, R. H. (2020). Postmodernism and Medical Education. Academic Medicine, 95(6), 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003136
Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Success. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Hanaba, S., & Voitiuk, O. (2022). Heuristic Potential of Transformative Learning Ideas. Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 94(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2022-1.02
Houser, N. O. (2005). Art, Aesthetics and Equity Education: A Postmodern Investigation. Curriculum and Teaching, 20(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/20.1.04
Komogorova, M., Maksymchuk, B., Bernatska, O., Lukianchuk, S., Gerasymova, I., Popova, O., … Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Pedagogical Consolidation of Pupil-Athletes Knowledge of Humanities. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1). doi: 10.18662/rrem/13.1/367
Lambert, C. (2009). Pedagogies of participation in higher education: a case for research‐based learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360903194327
Laudo Castillo, X. (2012). La hipótesis de la pedagogía postmoderna. Educación, verdad y relativismo [The hypothesis of postmodern pedagogy. Education, truth and relativism]. Teoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria, 23(2), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.14201/8645
Londesborough, M. (2018). Knowledge: A Dirty Word in Arts Education? https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/rsa-blogs/2018/07/dirty-words-in-arts-education
Matusov, E., & Pease-Alvarez, L. (2020). Moving from collaboration to critical dialogue in action in education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.292
Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., Kullenberg, T., & Curtis, K. (2019). Dialogic analysis vs. discourse analysis of dialogic pedagogy: Social science research in the era of positivism and post-truth. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.272
McLean, M., Abbas, A., & Ashwin, P. (2017). Quality in Undergraduate Education: How Powerful Knowledge Disrupts Inequality. Bloomsbury Academic.
Morales-Caruncho, X., & Chacón-Gordillo, P. (2018). Pre-service teachers and visual arts education. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 41(2), 287–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1434036
Mühlpachr, P. (2008). Social determinants of education in the postmodern society. Santalka. Filologija. Edukologija, 16(4), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.7459/es/22.1.03
Nenko, Y., Medynskyi, S., Maksymchuk, B., Lymarenko, L., Rudenko, L., Kharchenko, … Maksymchuk, I. (2022). Communication Training of Future Sports Coaches in the Context of Neurophysiological Patterns. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1/268
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. doi: 10.18662/po/11.4/235
Pittard, E. (2015). Who does critical pedagogy think you are? Investigating how teachers are produced in critical pedagogy scholarship to inform teacher education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1066679
Rancière, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. Verso.
Rømer, T. A. (2011). Postmodern Education and the Concept of Power. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00566.x
Skregelid, L. (2020a). A call for dissensus in art education! International Journal of Education Through Art, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00024_1
Skregelid, L. (2020b). Dissensuality and Affect in Education. International Journal of Art & Design, 40(4), 690 – 701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12381
Skregelid, L. (2021). Zoom in on Dry Joy-Dissensus, Agonism and Democracy in Art Education. Education Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010028
Skregelid, L. (2016). Tribuner for dissens. En studie av ungdomsskoleelevers møtermed samtidskunst i en skole- ogkunstmuseums kontekst [Scenes ofdissensus. A study of secondary schoolstudents’encounters with contemporary artin a school and art museum context]. University of Oslo.
Tsapovska, L. S. (2020). Kompetentnisna osvitnya paradyhma yak tsilʹova spryamovanistʹ osvity v Ukrayini [Competency-based educational paradigm as the target orientation of education in Ukraine]. Mizhnarodnyy naukovyy zhurnal «Osvita i Nauka», 2(29), 125–129.
Zajda, J. (2003). Discourses of Postmodern Globalization: The Future Role of Comparative Education Research. Education and Society, 21(1), 99–113(15). https://doi.org/10.7459/es/21.1.06
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
