Reconsidering Intercultural Component of Foreign Language Learning in the Result of Russia-Ukraine War (Ukrainian Perspective)

Authors

  • Oleksandr Pasichnyk Khmelnytskyi National University, Ukraine; Institute of Pedagogy, National Academy of Pedagogic Science of Ukraine. https://orcid.org/my-orcid?orcid=0000-0002-0665-2099
  • Valeriy Redko Institute of Pedagogy, National Academy of Pedagogic Science of Ukraine
  • Olena Pasichnyk Khmelnytskyi National University
  • Natalia Shkoliar Khmelnytskyi National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/812

Keywords:

learning content, intercultural awareness, wars and conflicts, human values and interpersonal relations

Abstract

According to the generally accepted paradigm culture is considered an indispensable element of language learning process. Analysis of modern didactic materials and textbooks shows that target culture is presented in both explicit and implicit way. Authors insist that shaping students’ intercultural awareness cannot be limited to students’ exposure to another culture. Real intercultural approach also involves students’ ability to present their home country and culture. For this purpose it is essential to determine elements of students’ native culture which are to be incorporated in language learning process. Analysis of cultural patterns utilized in language learning proves that it offers a variety of everyday and touristic topics but omits the problems of wars and conflicts which are pertinent to many countries. The full-scale Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has challenged educators in Ukraine to reconsider approaches to cultural representations of home country. Authors claim that current war has significantly transformed the image of Ukraine as well as the global agenda, and showcase this with relevant examples. Due to these facts it has become impossible for students to present their home country through the prism of peaceful relations and omit the problem of war and its implications.  For this purpose authors specified war-related topics which are relevant to national curriculum and can be potentially incorporated in the content of foreign language learning. In order to find out educators’ attitude towards incorporating war-related problems in national curriculum the authors have questioned over 300 teachers from various parts of Ukraine. The obtained data clearly shows that most educators support the idea of integrating war-related topics as they have a potential to showcase the problem of human values, inter-personal relations and cultural dimensions.

References

Allen, W. (1985). Toward cultural proficiency. In A.C. Omaggio (Ed.), Proficiency, curriculum, articulation: The ties that bind (pp. 137-166). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference.

Alshenqeeti, H. (2020). Representation of culture in EFL textbooks and learners’ preference. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v7i2.1647

Avruch, K. (1998). Culture & conflict resolution. US Institute of Peace Press

Batton, J. (2015) Textbooks and other education materials: What key messages do we want to convey and how? UNESCO.

Byram, M. (1989). Cultural studies in foreign language education. Multilingual Matters.

Byram, M., & Grundy, P. (2002). Context and culture in language teaching and learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(3), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666643.

Byram, M., Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. [Electronic Version]. https://core.ac.uk/display/111018814

Colson, E., & Geertz, C. (1975). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Contemporary Sociology, 4(6), 637. https://doi.org/10.2307/2064031 .

Erickson, H. L. (2002). Concept-based curriculum and instruction. Corwin Press.

Europe, C. O. (2002). Common European framework of reference for languages. Council of Europe.

Evans, V., & Dooley, J. (1998). Mission: FCE. 2 : Coursebook.

Falla, T., & Davies, P. A. (2012). Solutions 2nd Edition Intermediate. Student’s Book. Oxford University Press, USA.

Fernández Aparicio, J. (2022) Guerra y «bibliocidio»: la destrucción y censura de colecciones en Rusia y Ucrania. Documento de Análisis IEEE 47/2022. Retrieved from https://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_analisis/2022/DIEEEA47_2022_JAVFER _Bibliocidio.pdf

Goldstein, D. (2020). Two States. Eight textbooks. Two American stories. The New York Times, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/12/us/texas-vs-california-history-textbooks.html.

Harger, L., & Niemitz-Rossant, C. J. (2016). English G Access Band 4: 8. Schuljahr - Allgemeine Ausgabe - Schülerbuch.

Harris, G. (2023, March 1). Russian or Ukrainian? Museums update Kazimir Malevich's nationality. The Art Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/03/01/russian-or-ukrainian-museums-update-kazimir-malevichs-nationality

Hein, L. & Selden, M. (2000). The lessons of war, global power, and social change. In Hein L. and Selden M. (Eds), Censoring History: Citizenship and Memory in Japan, Germany, and the United States. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315292298

Hinkel, E. (2001). Building awareness and practical skills to facilitate cross-cultural communication. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 343-358). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Killick, D. & Poveda, J. (1997). Perceptions of cross-cultural capability: is EFL another language? Proceedings of the conference at Leeds Metropolitan University, 15-16 December 1997.

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Kuzio, T. (2000). Ukraine: Myths, national historiography, nation and state‐building. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 6(4), 106-109, DOI: 10.1080/13537110008428614 (in Ukrainian)

Miroliubov, А. (2002). History of foreign language teaching methodology. Moscow, Russia: Stupeni, Infra (in Russian).

Nostrand, H. (1966). Describing and teaching the sociocultural context of a foreign language and literature. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Trends in language teaching (pp. 1-25).

Nostrand, H. L. (1978). The “emergent model” (Structured inventory of a sociocultural system) applied to contemporary France. Contemporary French Civilization, 2(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.3828/cfc.1978.2.2.007

Pasichnyk О. (2021). Didactic outline of intercultural competence as an integral component of communicative competence in foreign languages. Ukrainian Educational Journal, (3), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2021-3-35-44 (in Ukrainian)

Pershukova, O. (2008). Foreign approach to shaping sociocultural awareness in foreign language textbooks. Problems of Modern Textbook, (8), 375–384. (in Ukrainian).

Redko, V.H. (2017). Structuring content of foreign language school textbooks: Theory and practice. Monograph. Kyiv: Pedahohichna Dumka. (in Ukrainian).

Risager, K. (2020). Language textbooks: windows to the world. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797767

Roldán Vera, E., & Fuchs, E. (Eds.). (2018). Textbooks and war: Historical and multinational perspectives. Springer.

Sapir, E. (1961). Culture, language and personality: Selected essays.

Teff-Seker, Y. (2020). Peace and conflict in Israeli state-approved textbooks: 2000-2018. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1716392

UNDP, (2020). Human Mobility, Shared Opportunities: A Review of the 2009 Human Development Report and the Way Ahead, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP-IOM-Human-Mobility-Shared-Opportunities.pdf

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf.

Wildman, J., & Beddall, F. (2013). Insight: Pre-Intermediate: Student Book. OUP Oxford.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

Pasichnyk, O., Redko, V., Pasichnyk, O., & Shkoliar, N. (2024). Reconsidering Intercultural Component of Foreign Language Learning in the Result of Russia-Ukraine War (Ukrainian Perspective). Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/812

Issue

Section

Reform, Change and Innovation in Education