Student Teachers’ Perception of Science Teaching in Croatia

Authors

  • Alma Škugor Faculty of Education, University of Osijek, Croatia
  • Alena Letina Ph.D., Associate Professor, Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Croatia
  • Suzana Tomaš Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Split, Croatia; Head of Center for Research and Development of Lifelong Learning 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.3/880

Keywords:

student-centered teaching, teacher-centered teaching, teacher education students, DASTT-C

Abstract

In the Republic of Croatia, all education-related documents, reforms, and changes at all levels of education rest on a constructivist approach to learning and teaching. The initial teacher education system should take responsibility for introducing new methodological scenarios, didactic design of spaces, and equipment that are compatible with contemporary learning theories and support multiple learning styles. This paper aimed to identify and compare the perceptions of teacher education students in the Republic of Croatia regarding the teaching of Science. Students’ perceptions in the academic year 2022/23 were compared to the academic year 2011/12 when the research was first conducted. This paper included teacher education students in their 2nd (N=366) and 5th year (N=386) of study from three Croatian universities. Students’ perception of teaching was assessed through drawings, the analysis of which indicates the students’ self-perception as teachers during the teaching of Science and reveals their preconceptions about teaching and learning. The results show that 2nd-year students are more likely to perceive themselves in teacher-centered environment. Furthermore, 2022/23 generation students are more likely to perceive themselves in teacher-centered environment when compared to students 11 years ago. For 5th-year students, there is no statistically significant difference in the perception of teaching between the 2011/12 generation and the 2022/23 generation. However, when the results are categorized on the continuum of teaching theory, it is evident that 24% more of them perceive themselves to be in teacher-centered classes in 2022/23 and 20% less in student-centered environment as opposed to 11 years ago. Therefore, it is recommended to modernize higher education teaching with new didactic solutions, strategies, and technologies that will help students change their perceptions of teaching and learning, and subsequently implement it once they start working.

Author Biography

Suzana Tomaš, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Split, Croatia; Head of Center for Research and Development of Lifelong Learning 

 

 

References

Ambusaidi, A. K. & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2012). A Longitudinal Study to Identify Prospective Science Teachers’ Beliefs about Science Teaching Using the Draw-a-science-teacher-test Checklist. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 291-311.

Aydogdu, B., & Ay, T. S. (2016). Determination of teacher characteristics that support constructivist learning environments. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(63). 293-310, http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.63.17

Azam, S. & Menon, D. (2021). Influence of Science Experiences on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 25(1), 20-45.

Bakır, S. (2016). What are their beliefs? What is their approach in practice? What is the profile of their science teachers and professors?. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(5), 587-602. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.402a

Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best performing schools come out on top. McKinsey and Company.

Bautista, N. U. (2011). Investigating the use of vicarious and mastery experiences in influencing early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 333-349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43156605

Buldur, S. (2016). A longitudinal investigation of the preservice science teachers’ beliefs about science teaching during a science teacher training programme. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262084

Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 649-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9179-6

El-Deghaidy, H. (2006). An investigation of pre-service teacher’s self-efficacy and self-image as a science teacher in Egypt. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7 (2), Article 2 http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7_issue2/heba/index.htm accessed 15/2/2011

Finson, K. D., Pedersen, J. E. & Thomas, J. (2006). Comparing science teaching styles to students perception of scientist. University of Nebraska, Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education.

Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism Revisited: Implications and Reflections. The Constructivist, 16(1), 21-38.

Go, Y., Kang, J (2015). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ self-images of science teaching in constructivism science education courses. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 1-25.

Hulings (2022). What are they bringing with them? Understanding past science experiences of preservice elementary teachers and what they mean for the science methods course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59 (8), 1465-1488.

Imaduddin, M., Zuhaida, A., & Hidayah F. F. (2019). Pre-Service science teachers’ images about their past and future classrooms: Scratches from Indonesian teacher training Program at Islamic University.Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 459-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.549257

Jones, M. G. & Leagon, M. (2014). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs: Reforming practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, 830-847). Routledge

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of Research on Teacher Belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6

Kalyon, D. S. (2020). Primary teachers’ and students’ images of teachers and learning environments. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 155-167. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1249

Kleickmann, T., Vehmeyer, J. & Möller, K. (2010). Zusammenhänge zwischen Lehrervorstellungen und kognitivem Strukturieren im Unterricht am Beispiel von Scaffolding-Maßnahmen [Connections between teacher conceptions and cognitive structuring in the classroom using scaffolding as examples]. Educational Science/ Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38(3), 210-228.

Lay, Y. F. & Khoo, C. H. (2013). Pre-service science teachers’ mental images of science teaching. Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(84), 1361-1377.

Liaw, E. (2009). Teacher efficacy of pre-service teachers in Taiwan: The influence of classroom teaching and group discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.005

Louca, P., Rigas, P. & Valanides, N. (2002). Primary student teachers’ conceptions of science teaching. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science Education. Nicosia, Cyprus, 242-248.

Markic, S., Eilks, I. & Valanides, N. (2008). Developing a tool to evaluate differences in beliefs about science teaching and learning among freshman science student teachers from different science teaching domains: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75311

Markic, S. & Eilks, I. (2012). A comparison of student teachers beliefs from four different science teaching domains using a mixed methods design. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 589-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608092

Matijević, M. (2010). Između didaktike nastave usmjerene na učenika i kurikulumske teorije. U: Zbornik radova četvrtog kongresa matematike. Hrvatsko matematičko društvo i Školska knjiga, 391- 408.

Mensah, F. M. (2011). The DESTIN: Preservice teachers’ drawings of the ideal elementary science teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 111(8), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00103.x

Minogue, J. (2010). What is the teacher doing? what are the students doing? An application of the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Test. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 767–781. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43156577

Mundhenk, L. G. (2004). Toward an understanding of what it means to be student centered: a new teacher´s journey. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 447-462.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252660

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307-332. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170741

Schumacher, F. & Wilde, M. (2021). When prospective biology teachers visualize their beliefs about teaching and learning by drawing it, is it more than a reproduction of their experienced school lessons? European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.799

Šagud, M. (2006.). Odgojitelj kao refleksivni praktičar. Visoka učiteljska škola.

Škugor, A. (2013). The Paradigm of Pupil-Oriented Science and Society Teaching as a Guideline in Student Training at Faculties of Teacher Education (Doctoral thesis). Zagreb: Faculty of Teacher Education

Talsma, V. L. (2007). Children learning science: Analysis of drawings from the science methods classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North-Central Association for Science Teacher Educators (NASTE), October 11-13, 2007, Madison, WI

Tatar, N., Yildiz Feyzioğlu, E. Buldur, S. & Akpinar, E. (2012). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Mental Models about Science Teaching. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(4), 2934-2940. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1002893.pdf

Thomas, J. A., Pederson, J. E. & Finson, K. D. (2001). Validating the Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist (DASTT-C): Exploring Mental Models and Teacher Beliefs. University of Nebraska, Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teaclearfacpub/94 od 13.3.2010

Turkmen, H. & Unver, E. (2018). Comparison of elementary students’ images of science teaching for Turkish, Dutch, Scottish, and German science classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6 (11), 2624-2633, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2018.061127

Ucar, S. (2012). How Do pre-service science teachers’ views on science, scientists, and science teaching change over time in a science teacher training program? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 255–266

Valenčič Zuljan, M. (2008). Subjektivne teorije - cjeloživotno učenje. Hrvatsko futurološko društvo.

Yilmaz, H., Turkmen, H., Pedersen, J. E. & Cavasi, P. H. (2007). Evaluation of Pre-service Teachers Images of Science Teaching in Turkey. University of Nebraska, Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teaclearfacpub/80 accessed 13/2/2024

Downloads

Published

2024-08-12

How to Cite

Škugor, A., Letina, A. ., & Tomaš, S. (2024). Student Teachers’ Perception of Science Teaching in Croatia. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.3/880

Issue

Section

Reform, Change and Innovation in Education

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now