Exploring the Relationship between Empathy, Friendliness, and Group Inclusion in Primary School Social Dynamics

Authors

  • Doina-Maria Schipor "Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Universității 13, 720229, Suceava, Romania
  • Andreea Baru "Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Universității 13, 720229, Suceava, Romania
  • Otilia Clipa "Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Universității 13, 720229, Suceava, Romania;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.4/916

Keywords:

affective empathy, cognitive empathy, comfort intention, friendly attitude, group inclusion

Abstract

Empathy plays a pivotal role in fostering harmonious development among children. The present study aimed to explore the relationships among empathy, friendliness, and group inclusion in third and fourth-grade students, as well as to identify factors influencing students' inclusion or exclusion within peer groups. The study involved 78 students from third and fourth grades in two counties in Romania. Data were collected through self-reported questionnaire measuring empathy and friendliness, and a sociometric test to assess group inclusion. The questionnaires were completed under the supervision of a teacher. Quantitative data analysis was processed to validate the relationship between variables. The factors influencing students' inclusion or exclusion within peer groups were identified through qualitative analysis of the recorded responses from the sociometric test. Results revealed positive correlations between cognitive empathy and friendly demeanour, as well as between the level of comfort intention (one dimension of empathy) and inclusion in group activities. Personality traits (such as friendliness, humour, kindness, cheerfulness, creativity) emerged from the qualitative analysis as primary criteria used by children for group inclusion or exclusion. These findings not only inform classroom practice but also contribute to theoretical understanding, with quantitative results confirming findings from previous research. Teachers are encouraged to use these scientifically validated results to address group management issues. Based on these findings, researchers can focus on future investigation of these variables.

References

Andrieş, V. (2021). Activitatea în grup/echipă-metodă de învățare nonformală la disciplina educație pentru societate. Metodologii de învățare eficientă în contextul noilor provocări ale educației (vol. 6, pp. 12–16). Tipografia Universităţii de Stat din Tiraspol.

Asada, M. (2015). Development of artificial empathy. Neuroscience Research, 90, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.12.002

Berndt, T. J. (2004). Children’s friendships: Shifts over a half-century in perspectives on their development and their effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0014

Boele, S., Van der Graaff, J., de Wied, M., Van der Valk, I. E., Crocetti, E., & Branje, S. (2019). Linking parent–child and peer relationship quality to empathy in adolescence: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(6), 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-00993-5

Bryant, B. (1994). 2. How Does Social Support Function in Childhood?. In F. Nestmann & K. Hurrelmann (Ed.), Social Networks and Social Support in Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 23-36). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866377.23

Clipa, O., & Schipor, M. D. (2015). Individual and group frames of socialization-the relation between collective self-esteem and attachment style. In O. Clipa & G. Cramariuc, Educaţia în societatea contemporană. Aplicaţii. (pp. 65-74), Lumen.

Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A Review of the Concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466

de Wied, M., Branje, S. J., & Meeus, W. H. (2007). Empathy and conflict resolution in friendship relations among adolescents. Aggressive behavior, 33(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20166

de Wied, M., Gispen-de Wied, C., & van Boxtel, A. (2010). Empathy dysfunction in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders. European Journal of Pharmacology, 626(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.10.016

Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

Erwin, P. (1998). Friendship in childhood and adolescence. Routledge

Fuchs, T. (2019). Empathy, group identity, and the mechanisms of exclusion: An investigation into the limits of empathy. Topoi, 38(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9499-z

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007

Griffiths, V. (1989). Adolescent girls and their friends: a feminist ethnography. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).

Hey, V. (1997). The company she keeps: An ethnography of girls’ friendships. Open University Press.

Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children's friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X24591

Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2010). The development of stereotyping and exclusion. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(4). 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.66

Nestmann F, Hurrelmann K. (1994). Social networks and social support in childhood and adolescence. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin

Nash, R. (1973). Classrooms observed. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Overgaauw, S., Rieffe, C., Broekhof, E., Crone, E. A., & Güroğlu, B. (2017). Assessing empathy across childhood and adolescence: Validation of the empathy questionnaire for children and adolescents (EmQue-CA). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00870

Öztürk, N. (2019). Assessing the friendship quality of children between the ages of 9 and 12 based on certain variables. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 5(1-2), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.599837

Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., Feldman, R. D., & Mandrila-Sonetto, A. (2010). Dezvoltarea umana. Trei.

Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Schäfer, S. J., Kauff, M., Prati, F., Kros, M., Lang, T., & Christ, O. (2021). Does negative contact undermine attempts to improve intergroup relations? Deepening the understanding of negative contact and its consequences for intergroup contact research and interventions. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12422

Sun, B., Luo, Z., Zhang, W., Li, W., & Li, X. (2018). Age-related differences in affective and cognitive empathy: Self-report and performance-based evidence. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1360835

van den Bedem, N. P., Willems, D., Dockrell, J. E., van Alphen, P. M., & Rieffe, C. (2019). Interrelation between empathy and friendship development during (pre)adolescence and the moderating effect of developmental language disorder: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 28(3), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12353

VandenBos, G. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Schipor, D.-M., Baru, A., & Clipa, O. (2024). Exploring the Relationship between Empathy, Friendliness, and Group Inclusion in Primary School Social Dynamics. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(4), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.4/916

Issue

Section

Psycho-Social Competencies & Educational Strategies