Normative and Institutional Frameworks for the Functioning of Supervision in Social Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/47Keywords:
supervision in social work, ethics, supervision framework, transdisciplinarity,Abstract
Supervision is understood as a professional, formative, administrative and managerial practice provided by an experimented professional to a professional in the same field, with the purpose of transfering knowledge and training specific competences, useful in his practice with the purpose of providing as qualitative as possible services to its own beneficiaries. The article reviews a series of normative frameworks based on which the process of supervision of social services in countries such as Singapore, New Zeeland, Australia, Canada, USA, Great Britain and Romania. By comparatively analyzing these frameworks, we noticed that generally, there are two models formulated – the first one which regards the supervisor as a professional with experiece in social work, and the other model sees supervision as a distinct profession with transdisciplinary nature, but with access limited by the need for an initial training and previous experience in the field of social work. We notice that, in general, the national frameworks identify three functions of supervision: administrative, formative and managerial, and place a special emphasis on the role of the supervisor as trainer in the field of professional ethics.References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers Inc. (ANZASW) (2009). ANZASW Supervision Policy. New Zealand: ANZASW.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers Inc. (ANZASW) (2016). ANZASW Code of Ethics. New Zealand: ANZASW. Retrived from https://anzasw.nz/wp-content/uploads/ANZASW-Supervision-PolicyUpdated-February-2015.pdf
Australian Association of Social Workers. (AASW) (2014). Supervision Standards. Australian Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/6027
Barretta-Herman, A. (1994). On the development of a model of supervision for licensed social work practitioners. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(2), 55-64.
BASW/CoSW. (2011). England research on supervision in social work, with particular reference to supervision practice in multi disciplinary teams. Retrieved from https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_13955-1_0.pdf
Benton, A.D., Dill, K., & Williams, A.E. (2017). Sacred time: Ensuring the provision of excellent supervision. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 32(4), 290-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2017.1408416.
Berger, C., & Mizrahi, T. (2001). An evolving paradigm of supervision within health care environments. Social Work in Health Care, 32(4), 1-18.
Bernard, J., & Goodyear, R. (1998). Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision. USA: Taylor & Francis Inc.
Bourque, S., Couture, D., Archambault-Heroux, A., Boulanger, L., Gusew, A., Lambin, M., Laroche, N., Poirier, L., Seaborn, J., & Turcotte, P. (2010). Guide sur la supervision professionnelle des travailleuses sociales et des travaillesurs sociaux. Retrived from https://www.otstcfq.org/docs/documentsaccueil/guide_supervision.pdf?sfvrsn=1
Burns, M. (1958). The historical development of the process of casework supervision as seen in the professional literature of social work. (Unpublished doctoral disertation). MI: University Microfilms International. University of Chicago, Ann Arbor.
Caras (Frunză), A., & Sandu, A. (2014a). Epistemic and Pragmatic Backgrounds of Supervision of Ethics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 142-151.
Caras, A., & Sandu, A. (2014b). The Role of Supervision in Professional Development of Social Work Specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 28(1), 75-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2012.763024.
Chateauneuf, D., Ramde, J., & Avril, A. (2016). Processes Employed by Social Work Practitioners in Child Welfare for Exchanging and Using Knowledge. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(4), 397-415. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2015.1116439.
Cojocaru, S. (2006). Supervizarea apreciativă de grup în asistenţa socială. Utilizarea principiilor anchetei apreciative în procesul de supervizare. Revista reţelei pentru prevenirea abuzului şi neglijării copilului, 107-116. Timisoara, Romania: Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara.
Cojocaru, S. (2007). Supervizarea de grup apreciativă. În Munteanu, A. (coord.), Supervizarea - Aspecte practice şi tendinţe actuale. Iaşi, România: Polirom.
Damian, S.-I., Bulgaru-Iliescu, D., Rohozneanu, A., Glodeanu, A., Diac, M., David, S., & Hunea, I. (2017). The Role of Educational Measures for Juvenile Offenders in Forensic Psychiatry. Revita Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 9(3), 140-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2017.0903.09
Departamentul de Dezvoltare Socială a Republicii Africa de Sud (DDSRAS) (2012). Supervision Framework for the Social Work Profession in South Africa. Retrieved from: https://www.westerncape.gov.za/assets/departments/socialdevelopment/supervision_framework_for_the_social_work_profession_in _south_africa_2012.pdf
Department of Social Development (DSD). 2006. Integrated service delivery model towards improved social services. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Engelbrecht, L.K. (2013). Social Work supervision policies and frameworks: Playing notes or making music? Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 49(4), 456-468.
Federaţia Organizaţiilor Neguvernamentale pentru Copii (FONPC) (2017). Standard ocupaţional Supervizor în serviciile sociale Cod COR 263513.
Fitzpatrick, S., Smith, M., & Wilding, C. (2012). Quality allied health clinical supervision policy in Australia: A literature review. Australian Health Review, 36(4), 461-465.
Frunză, S. (2017). Seeking meaning, living authenticity and leadership in public space. A philosophical perspective. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 52 E/2017, 23-37.
General Social Care Council (GSCC) (2008). Sociat work at its best: Astatement of social work role and tasks for the 21st centrury. Retrived from http://www.gscc.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/4EDB6D7E-C18C-4A38- 8BEAD271E9DFFC06/0/RolesandTasksstatementFINAL.pdf
Gray, S. (1990). The interplay of social work licensure and supervision: An exploratory study. The Clinical Supervisor, 8(1), 53-66.
Kadushin, A. (2014). Supervision in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in Social Work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Lonneman Doroff, T.D. (2012). Supervision in applied counseling settings: A socially constructed grounded theory (Order No. 3523437). Available from ProQuest Central. (1044574761).
MontfortCare. (2016). Superecipe: The Montfort Care Guide to Supervision. Singapore: MontfortCare.
Morrison, T. (1993). Staff Supervision in Social Care. Longman: Harlow.
Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Social Work Practice.
Muntean, A. (2007). Supervizarea. Aspecte practice şi tendinţe actuale. Iaşi, România: Editura Polirom.
National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2013). Best Practice Standards in Social Work Supervision. National Association of Social Workers.Retrieved from https://www.sasw.org.sg/docs/SWD_SocialWorlSupervisionGuidelines_F INAL.pdf
O'Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M.S. (2015). Social Work Supervision Research (1970- 2010): The Way We Were and the Way Ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616-633. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct115
O'Donoghue, K., Ju, P.W.Y., & Tsui, M.-S. (2018). Constructing an evidenceinformed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1341387.
O'Donoghue, K.B. (2010). Towards the Construction of Social Work Supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Study of the Perspectives of Social Work Practitioners and Supervisors (Unpublished doctoral disertation). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Ordinul 288/2006 pentru aprobarea standardelor minimale obligatorii privind managementul de caz în domeniul protecţiei drepturilor copilului. Emitent: Ministerul Muncii, Solidarităţii sociale şi familiei, Autoritatea Naţională pentru Protecţia Drepturilor Copilului. Monitorul Oficial Nr 637 din 24 iulie 2006.
Osvat, C., Marc, C., & Makai-Dimeny, J. (2014). Group supervision in social work: A model of intervention for practitioners. Revista de Asistenta Sociala, 1, 17- 26.
Philp, K., Guy, G., & Lowe, R. (2007). Social constructionist supervision or supervision as social construction? Some dilemmas. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 26(1), 51-62.
Ponea, S. (2009). Introducere în domeniul supervizării. În Ponea, S., Porumb, E., Racles, A. & Rogojan, C. (eds.), Deschideri postmoderne în sociologie şi asistenţă socială. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen.
RSA (Republic of South Africa). (1978). Social Service Professions Act, No. 110 of 1978. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Sandu, A., & Caras, A. (2013a). Deconstruction of charity. Postmodern ethical approaches. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 12(36), 72-99.
Sandu, A., & Caras, A. (2013b). Philosophical Practice and Social Welfare Counselling and Supervision of Ethics. Philosophical Practice: Journal of the APPA, 8(3), 55-64.
Sandu, A., Necula, R., Frunza, A., Unguru, E., & Damian, S. (2017). A qualitative inquiry in the social construction of chronic illness. Case study on diabetes mellitus. Doctors’ perspectives. Archiv euromedica, 7(2), 18-23. WOS: 000426628100006 .
Sandu, A., Unguru, E., Ponea, S., & Cojocaru, S. (2010). Analysis of professional competencies in social services supervision. Social Research Reports, 17, 3-56.
Singapore Association of Social Workers. (SASW) (2000). A Manual on Supervision for Social Work Supervisors. Singapore: Armour Publishing Pte Ltd.
Skills for Care and CWDC (2007). Providing Effective Supervision. Retrieved from http://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/developing_skills/leadership_and_manag ement/providing_effective_supervision.aspx
Social Work Accreditation and Advisory Board (SWAAB) (1987). Social Work Supervision Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.sasw.org.sg/docs/SWD_SocialWorlSupervisionGuidelines_F INAL.pdf
Tsui, M.S. (1997a). The roots of social work supervision: An historical review. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 191-198.
Tsui, M.S. (1997b). Empirical research on social work supervision: The state of the art (1970–1995). Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2), 39–54.
Tsui, M.S. (2004). Social Work Supervision: Contexts and Concepts. SUA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Tsui, M.S. (2005a). Functions of social work supervision in Hong Kong. Nternational Social Work, 48(4), 485-495. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872805053471
Tsui, M.S. (2005b). Social Work supervision: contexts and concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Unguru, E., & Sandu, A. (2017). Supervision. From Administrative Control to Continuous Education and Training of Specialists in Social Work. Revista Romanească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 9(1), 17-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2017.0901.02
Vlăduţescu, S. (2015). A Man Better Informed, Safer Society: Social Communication Action and Security. In Sandu, A., Frunza, A., Ciulei, T., Gorghiu, G., Petrovici, A. (2015). Rethinking Social Action. Core Values (1391- 1395). Bologna, Italy: Editografica. ISBN: 978-88-7587-725-5.
Zamfir, E. (2006). Asistenţa socială ca practică şi formare profesională: standarde profesionale, evaluare, monitorizare şi supervizare. Revista de Asistenţă Socială, nr. 1, Bucureşti.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND