Creativity in Teaching a Foreign Language

Authors

  • Cătălin Drăcşineanu Associate Professor Ph.D., “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/95

Keywords:

creativity, pedagogy, creative thinking, educational approach

Abstract

One of the primary goals of a teacher is to motivate students to learn and to find pleasure and enjoyment in the learning process. A teacher who fails to find a way to touch the hearts and lives of learners is not effective. To achieve this goal, teachers must be more humanistic and creative in their teaching methods. Being a "connected" teacher means being able to convey information to students using motivational methods specific to their level, desire and needs. Thus, creativity has become one of the central issues in recent educational research. Teachers must not always be creative themselves but also find and stimulate the creativity of students; this is one of the most important directions to improve and modernize the teaching process. The development of creativity is a social demand, but also an individual need. It is more and more demanded by society to overcome the gap between creative activities and routine and to stimulate the progress of society.

References

Andreasen, N. C. (2005). The Creating Brain: The Neuroscience of Genius (74 edition). Dana Press.

Bialystok, E., Fergus, I., Craik, M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240-250.

Botella, M., Nelson, J., & Zenasni, F. (2016). Les macro et micro processus créatifs. In I. Capron-Puozzo (ed.), La créativité en éducation et formation (pp. 33-46). De Boeck Supérieur.

Clarke, M. A. (2015). Creativity in modern foreign languages teaching and learning. Heacademy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/creativity-modern-foreign-languages-teaching-and-learning

Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A Review of EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies of Creativity and Insight, Psychological Bulletin, American Psychological Association, 136, 5.

Gallagher, S. (2007). Neurophilosophy and neurophenomenology. In L. Embree & T. Nenon (eds.), Phenomenology (Vol. 5) (pp. 293-316). Zeta Press.

Ilyin, Ye. P. (2012). Psychology of art, creativity and talent. Peter.

Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Colin.

Pluskwa, D., Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2003). L’approche actionnelle en pratique: la tâche d’abord, la grammaire ensuite!. In J. J. Richer, C. Bourguignon, P. Griggs & E. M. Peris (Eds.), L’approche actionnelle dans l’enseignement des langues, onze articles pour mieux comprendre et faire le point (pp. 206-231). Maison des langues.

Sadykova, A., & Kayumova, D. (2014). The Correlation between Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews: The Role of Metaphor. Life Science Journal, 11(6), 552-555.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-24

How to Cite

Drăcşineanu, C. . (2023). Creativity in Teaching a Foreign Language. Anuarul Universitatii "Petre Andrei" Din Iasi - Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice, 30, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/95